Summary
Samenvatting Human Rights Law
- Course
- Institution
Summary for International and European Human Rights Law, 50 pages. In-depth summary with an indication of all the important cases.
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
laurapalma
Content preview
Human Rights: samenvatting1. CONCEPT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
Fundamental rights
What are “human rights”?
→ Used in various contexts
› Moral philosophy, politics, legal notions, …
› This class: legal aspect (so also constitutional rights)
→ What do they do?
› Limit power of authority
› Protect human dignity
⊳ What is human dignity? Whose human dignity must prevail? Ex.
Wakkenheim: dwarves made money by being tossed around by
villagers, ex. Sex workers
⊳ If we turn majority point of view into law, we dismiss the minority
point of view
⊳ ‘90s: inflation of use of human dignity (thousands of cases)
Categories of human rights
→ 1st generation
› Classic civil and political rights
› States are NOT allowed to do something
› French and American Revolution, Magna Carta
› Ex. Freedom of press, freedom of expression, …
nd
→ 2 generation
› Social, economic and cultural rights
› States HAVE to provide something
› Russian Revolution
› Ex. Right to an education, right to good living conditions, right to healthcare
rd
→ 3 generation
› Collective rights
› Movement away from classic legal understanding!
› Ex. Right to development, right to peace, right to self-determination
→ BUT all these rights are connected to each other
› States can incarcerate people, but they must provide sufficient food and
medical care etc.
› Strategic litigation: if you argue it well enough, you could bring an
environmental issue before the Committee on the Rights of the Child (Greta
Thunberg did this)
⊳ Criticism: judges are becoming politicians
International dimension
→ Before WOII: protecting people against public authorities was a matter of national
law
→ Now: people also need protection against national authorities who fail to comply
with their own constitutions
Page 1 of 50
, Who are the holders of human rights?
→ Individuals
› Ex. Art. 1 ECHR: “everyone”, without further condition
› Ex. Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: “all individuals”
⊳ No condition on legal status within territory of state! This has faded
gradually over the years within the EU
→ Private entities
› Companies, associations, … (ex. Right to fair trial, freedom of expression)
→ Collectivities
› Mostly third-generation rights, ex. Right to self-determination, right to
dispose of natural wealth and resources
Who must respect human rights?
→ Public authorities or the State
› All its dimensions: executive, judiciary, and legislative power, but also lower
entities (like municipalities, provinces, …)
› Ex. In Belgium the ECHR is signed and ratified by the federal government
→ Private individuals and private entities
› ‘Horizontal application’ of human rights provisions
⊳ Ex. Landlord discriminates you on basis of race, sexual orientation, …
› You cannot bring a private entity before the Strasbourg court
⊳ If you protect one party’s right, you are dismissing the others, and
the other way around
⊳ You CAN bring State before the court because it did not protect you
against this violation
› Corporate human rights responsibility
⊳ But: big transnational corporations do not have to respect human
rights, even though they sometimes have cash-flows that outnumber
GDP’s of respectable states
o Ex. Children making clothes in Bangladesh
o Some work done, but it remains soft law (“Ruggie-
principles”)
Are fundamental rights absolute or relative?
→ Can right holders waive their rights?
› Yes, we do this all the time in agreements
› But there are conditions
→ Few human rights are absolute, mostly within framework of European Convention
› Ex. Right not to be tortured, non-retroactivity of criminal law, slavery
Do we have responsibilities and duties?
→ Does this not mean taking back part of the rights that were given?
→ Morality question?
Are human rights universal?
→ Difference in cultures about violations, rights, …
Page 2 of 50
, → There is a middle ground, but it is not because we share the same right that we have
the same conception of those rights
› Ex. Right of marriage vs. right of same-sex marriage
→ Complicated issue!
› That’s why we focus on the ECHR
2. HUMAN RIGHTS IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS AND IN INTERNATIONAL LAW
Human rights is an interplay between 3 levels
→ International level: United Nations
› Emphasis on state sovereignty
→ National level: control mechanism necessary!
→ Regional mechanisms
National sovereignty and international protection of human rights
In general
→ Principle of non-interference in domestic matters (art. 2, §7, UN Charter)
Actions in response to serious violations of human rights
→ Economic measures
› “Human rights clause” in the trade and cooperation agreements between
the EU and third countries
⊳ Ex. International cooperation ends if there is a violation of human
rights
› Possible reactions against violators
⊳ Principle: no agreements with human rights violators
⊳ Dialogue: try to exercise influence, so they will listen and change
› Economic sanctions (see art. 41 UN Charter)
⊳ Unilateral, ex. freezing economic belongings of companies, draining
importation/exportation
⊳ Serious impact on population of state (never food, medicine, or
education!)
→ Use of force (military intervention)
› Provisions of UN Charter:
⊳ Art. 2, §4: prohibition of use of force
⊳ Art. 42: action taken by Security Council
› Ex. NATO intervention in Yugoslavia (1999)
⊳ Sub-Commission resolution 1999/2
› The search for criteria:
⊳ International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty,
The responsibility to protect (2001): domestic state has responsibility
to act
⊳ UN 2005 World Summit Outcome, §§ 138-140: international
community must act, if domestic state is unwilling or unable to do so
Problem: agreement necessary within Security Council
Question: how does international humanitarian law (Geneve Conventions) and international
human rights law interrelate?
Page 3 of 50
, → Human rights are still applicable in case of an armed conflict
→ BUT: states can ask that they are suspended, in case of emergency
→ When there is an overlap, the ICJ says that human rights are lex generalis and
humanitarian law is lex specialis
Universality of human rights
Dispute: do international human rights standards reflect only Western values?
→ Some sort of neo-colonialism?
→ Even non-western writers of human rights were formed by western legal tradition
Some principles of international treaty law
Interpretation of treaties
→ Finding an agreement is easier when using vague and open terms
→ Treaty on treaties (art. 31-33)
› Art. 31: refer to the terms of the treaty, secondly look at context, thirdly take
in account the object of the treaty
⊳ Look at whole treaty, preamble, … so you have an idea about the
intentions
› Art. 32: look at discussions during preparation of treaty
→ Court of Europe: living convention
› Pragmatic, dynamic and evaluative interpretation of the convention
› Problem: you behave as a law-maker
Reservations
→ Completely lawful, common practice (see art. 19)
→ BUT if you have reservations about key-clauses of the treaty, the agreement
becomes null and void
› If exceptions are found to be illegal, you are STILL bound by the treaty!
→ Belgium often accepts rights, but only to the extent that they are compatible with
their constitutional rules
Denunciation of a treaty (see art. 56)
→ Provision: you have to follow procedure
→ No provision: no denunciation possible, except if parties intended to imply such
denunciations
→ Dilemma: if you comply too much with criticism, you can’t do your job properly, but
if you don’t comply, some states may leave the system altogether
› The question is what is better for the population?
Human rights law and international humanitarian law
Issue of protection of civilians in armed conflict
→ Creation of UN goes hand in hand with creation of human rights
› Experiences of Holocaust influenced the drafters heavily
→ Timeframe: colonization still exists, Cold War has not yet begun
› Not all African countries are independent yet
Page 4 of 50
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller laurapalma. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $7.56. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
56326 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now