100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
How far do you agree that The Aims & Methods of Black civil rights activists were radically different, 1917-55 vs. 1955-68? $4.50
Add to cart

Other

How far do you agree that The Aims & Methods of Black civil rights activists were radically different, 1917-55 vs. 1955-68?

 8 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

How far do you agree that The Aims & Methods of Black civil rights activists were radically different, 1917-55 vs. 1955-68? Unit 1F - In search of the American Dream: the USA, c1917-96? Pearson edexcel history comprehensive essay plan

Preview 1 out of 1  pages

  • December 15, 2023
  • 1
  • 2022/2023
  • Other
  • Unknown
avatar-seller
HFDYAT The Aims & Methods of Black civil rights activists were radically different, 1917-55 vs. 1955-68?

Intro:

- Define radically different as ‘extremely dissimilar in nature’ – not radically different despite change
- 2 main changes: tackling de jure to tackling de facto, non-violence to violence, (also growth of
separatist movement)  natural progression (evolutionary change) and minority

P1: De Jure vs De Facto

- 1917-55 aimed to tackle ‘de jure’:
o NAACP won some cases 1930s & 1940s, every case fought in 1950s
o 1948 Shelley v Kraemer, 1954 Brown v. Board
- 1955-68 focus shifted to tackling ‘de facto’:
o E.g. 1957 Little Rock, Arkansas
o 1961 CORE & SNCC Freedom rides
- However
o Not complete changes, simply shift in emphasis – once laws enforced, next logical step
was to ensure laws worked in practice
o Shift caused by laws not being enforced: e.g. 10 years after Brown v Board only 1/100
black students in South at integrated school

P2 : Non-violence vs. Violence

- 1917-55, focus on legal action & non-violent direct action
o NAACP law cases, MLK defined rules of non-violent protest (influenced by Ghandi)
o Peaceful direct action : 1917 Silent Protest Parade, CORE sit-ins (e.g. Chicago 1942)
- 1955-68, increased violence
o Took non-violence to places violence was likely following Montgomery Bus Boycott 1955
 1961 CORE & SNCC Freedom Rides
o Incited violence themselves
 1964 3 major riots in cities sparked by police brutality
- However
o Violence = minority, most violence directed at movt not from (e.g. Birmingham 1963)
o Media amplified violence (King accused them of trying to get militant statements)
o Sit-ins & boycotss used in both periods (Greensboro sit-in 1st February 1960)

P3 : Integration vs. Separatism

- 1917-55, collaboration with whites, CORE, MLK
- 1955-68 growth of separatism under Malcolm X (‘some land that we can call our own’)
o Black power encouraged excluding whites (Stokely Carmichael, Black Panthers 1966)
- However
o Unusual for CORE to collaborate with whites, even 1917-55 activists mostly black
o Separatist movements existed in both periods (Marcus Garvey ‘Back to Africa’ movement)
o Only small proportion wanted separation – only at end of period after movt split 1965

Conclusion:

- Not complete changes rather shifts in emphasis, e.g. de jure de facto
- Similarities across both periods (e.g. nonviolent protest)
- Changes weren’t widespread, often only to end of period/minority

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller miakadyan255. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $4.50. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

53068 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$4.50
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added