Dit is een samenvatting van het vak Argumentatieleer (). De samenvatting bevat heel de cursus, aangevuld met mijn eigen notities uit de les.
Geslaagd - eerste zit
ARGUMENTATIELEER
Inhoud
INTRODUCTIE................................................................................................. 4
HOOFDSTUK 1: BASISBEGRIPPEN....................................................................5
WAT IS ARGUMENTATIE?........................................................................................................ 5
Enkele voorbeelden...................................................................................................... 5
Kenmerken................................................................................................................... 6
Evaluatie van argumentaties........................................................................................ 7
ARGUMENTEREN ALS TAALHANDELING/SPEECH ACT......................................................................8
Basiscomponenten van de taalhandeling.....................................................................8
Geslaagdheidsvoorwaarden (felicity conditions)..........................................................9
Typologie van taalhandelingen....................................................................................9
Soorten taalhandelingen in gegevens en standpunt..................................................11
De argumentatie als complexe taalhandeling............................................................11
OVERTUIGEN M.B.V. ETHOS, PATHOS EN LOGOS......................................................................12
Ethos.......................................................................................................................... 12
Pathos........................................................................................................................ 13
Logos.......................................................................................................................... 13
Structuur van de cursus............................................................................................. 13
ARGUMENTATIELEER VS LOGICA............................................................................................. 13
ARGUMENTEREN VS REDENEREN............................................................................................ 14
ARGUMENTEREN VS VERKLAREN............................................................................................ 15
Verklaring vs uitleg.................................................................................................... 15
Soorten verklaringen..................................................................................................16
Verklaren vs argumenteren........................................................................................18
Verklaren vs begrijpen...............................................................................................18
HOOFDSTUK 2: INDICATOREN EN STRUCTUREN..............................................20
ARGUMENTATIEVE INDICATOREN............................................................................................ 20
Verklarende indicatoren versus argumentatieve indicatoren.....................................20
Indicatoren van argument/gegevens vs conclusie/standpunt.....................................20
ARGUMENTATIESTRUCTUREN................................................................................................. 22
Nevenschikkende vs meervoudige argumentatiestructuur........................................22
Argumentatiestructuur met substandpunten en/of tegenargumenten.......................23
HOOFDSTUK 3: HET CATEGORISCH SYLLOGISME.............................................25
BASISBEGRIPPEN PREDICAATLOGICA.......................................................................................25
Het Aristotelisch vierkant........................................................................................... 25
Categorische uitspraken............................................................................................. 27
Venn-diagrammen voor Categorische uitspraken.......................................................28
Conversie................................................................................................................... 30
Obversie..................................................................................................................... 31
HET CATEGORISCH SYLLOGISME............................................................................................ 32
Het basispatroon........................................................................................................ 32
Venn-diagrammen voor het Categorisch syllogisme..................................................33
Redeneerfouten.......................................................................................................... 35
HET QUASI-CATEGORISCH SYLLOGISME...................................................................................35
De twee basispatronen............................................................................................... 35
Venn-diagrammen voor het Quasi-categorisch Syllogisme.........................................36
Redeneerfouten.......................................................................................................... 37
1
,HOOFDSTUK 4: HET PROPOSITIONEEL SYLLOGISME........................................39
BASISBEGRIPPEN PROPOSITIELOGICA.......................................................................................39
Waarheidstafels voor negatie, conjunctie en disjunctie..............................................39
Materiële implicatie en equivalentie...........................................................................40
De wet van de Contrapositie......................................................................................41
Van geldige redenering naar tautologie.....................................................................42
MODUS PONENS................................................................................................................ 43
MODUS TOLLENS EN REDUCTIO AB ABSURDUM........................................................................43
Modus Tollens............................................................................................................ 43
Reductio ad absurdum (bewijs uit het ongerijmde)....................................................44
HET HYPOTHETISCH EN DISJUNCTIEF SYLLOGISME......................................................................45
Het hypothetisch syllogisme......................................................................................45
Het disjunctief syllogisme...........................................................................................46
REDENEERFOUTEN.............................................................................................................. 46
HOOFDSTUK 5: REDENEREN MET LOGISCHE OPERATOREN IN NATUURLIJKE TAAL
................................................................................................................... 49
CONTRADICTIE................................................................................................................... 49
TRANSITIVITEIT................................................................................................................... 49
“EN” VERSUS CONJUCTIE..................................................................................................... 49
“OF” VERSUS DISJUNCTIE..................................................................................................... 50
“ALS…DAN” VERSUS MATERIËLE IMPLICATIE............................................................................51
HOOFDSTUK 6: DEDUCTIE, INDUCTIE EN ABDUCTIE.........................................55
DEDUCTIE......................................................................................................................... 55
INDUCTIE.......................................................................................................................... 57
ABDUCTIE......................................................................................................................... 57
HOOFDSTUK 7: ENTHYNEEM, EPICHEIREEM EN MODEL VAN TOULMIN..............61
HET ENTHYMEEM: DEDUCTIE MET ONTBREKENDE PREMISSEN.......................................................61
PROBLEMEN MET ONTBREKENDE PREMISSEN.............................................................................62
HET EPICHEIREEM: DEDUCTIE EN ONDERSTEUNENDE PREMISSEN...................................................63
HET MODEL VAN TOULMIN.................................................................................................... 64
HOOFDSTUK 8: ARGUMENTATIE DOOR ASSOCIATIE: OPEENVOLGING EN CO-
EXISTENTIE.................................................................................................. 67
ARGUMENTATIE O.B.V. OPEENVOLGINGSRELATIES (“NA ELKAAR”).................................................68
Causaliteit (“objectief”)..............................................................................................68
Evaluatie (“subjectief”)..............................................................................................68
ARGUMENTATIE O.B.V. CO-EXISTENTIERELATIES (“TEGELIJK”)......................................................69
Persoon-gedrag.......................................................................................................... 70
Persoon-groep............................................................................................................ 70
Wezen-symptoom...................................................................................................... 70
HOOFDSTUK 9: ARGUMENTATIE DOOR ASSOCIATIE: INDUCTIE/ANALOGIE........71
ARGUMENTATIE O.B.V. INDUCTIE/GENERALISATIE.......................................................................71
ARGUMENTATIE O.B.V. ANALOGIE/VERGELIJKING........................................................................71
HOOFDSTUK 10: ARGUMENTATIE DOOR DISSOCIATIE......................................74
HOOFDSTUK 11: DROGREDENEN M.B.T. ZENDER EN ONTVANGER....................75
ARGUMENTUM AD HOMINEM................................................................................................. 75
ARGUMENTUM AD POPULUM (BANDWAGON ARGUMENT)..............................................................75
ARGUMENTUM AD VERECUNDIAM........................................................................................... 76
ARGUMENTUM AD MISERCORDIAM.......................................................................................... 76
2
, ARGUMENTUM AD BACULUM................................................................................................. 76
HOOFDSTUK 12: DROGREDENEN M.B.T. DE BOODSCHAP.................................78
VERSCHUIVEN VAN DE BEWIJSLAST......................................................................................... 78
STANDPUNT VAN TEGENSTANDER VERTEKENEN (DE STROMAN).....................................................78
ARGUMENTUM AD IGNORANTIAM............................................................................................ 78
CIRKELREDENERING (PETITIO PRINCIPII/BEGGING THE QUESTION)..................................................79
POST HOC ERGO PROPTER HOC............................................................................................. 79
ARGUMENTUM AD CONSEQUENTIAM........................................................................................ 79
HELLEND VLAK (SLIPPERY SLOPE) ARGUMENT...........................................................................80
DIVISIO............................................................................................................................ 80
COMPOSITIO / SECUNDUM QUID............................................................................................ 80
OPDRACHTEN.................................................................................................................... 80
3
, Introductie
Studiemateriaal:
- Syllabus
Beknopt
Niet voldoende enkel dat te studeren
- Colleges
Structuur:
I. Inleiding
II. Logische argumentatieschema’s
Deductie: theorie empirie
III. Quasi-logische argumentatieschema’s
IV. Ondersteunende argumentatieschema’s
V. Drogredenen
Examen:
Openvragen:
- 1/5 of 1/4: theorievragen (reproductievragen)
- Rest: toepassingsvragen (= analyse van argumentaties)
4
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller hannadewaele. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $7.52. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.