Exam (elaborations)
IB Philosophy Essay: Personhood (24/25)
- Course
- Institution
- IB philosophy essay on personhood - Grade 7 essay (24/25)
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
RichardG
Reviews received
Content preview
Being Human Essay – PersonhoodWith explicit reference to the stimulus and your own knowledge, discuss a philosophical
issue related to the question of what it means to be human.
An image of a monkey and a man both reaching towards each other depicts the similarities
and differences between these two animals, provoking the discussion concerning the moral
standing of living beings. Some would argue that life forms such as monkeys lack the
rationality and reason to be granted moral standing, whilst others suggest that any living
beings with the capacity for suffering and pain should have the right to moral consideration.
These perspectives refer to the problem of personhood, the intellectual debate involving
the identification of living beings in relation to their moral worth. What criteria make
someone a person, or worthy of inclusion in the moral community? Is it possible for an
animal such as this monkey to obtain the title of a person? In order to delve deeper into
these concepts, the notions of a person and moral community will need to be understood.
The term a person is derived from the basic meaning in the context of a drama, ‘the mask’,
referring to any character that plays a part in the performance. Hence, in relation to the real
world, a person is a being that has legal rights and the title of a juridical person. The term
moral community refers to “the network of those to whom we recognise an ethical
connection through the demands of justice, the bonds of compassion, or a sense of
obligation”. Two philosophers that have discussed personhood are Kant and Singer. Kant
proposed the idea that life forms which lack rationality have no moral worth, whilst Singer
advocates that the potential for suffering and pain which a being could experience should
allow for a degree of moral consideration. In terms of societal implications, it is very
important to identity what constitutes a person, as this recognition would imply the rights,
respect, and protection that an individual has. The question is raised to what degree should
animals, foetuses, and people in vegetative states have these basic rights that are provided
to the ‘persons’ within the moral community. This essay will critically evaluate both
perspectives, finding that whilst Kant’s proposition is thorough and raises some convincing
points, it contains faults and is defective as a description of personhood. Although Singer’s
argument contains some flaws, it will be argued that his animal rights theory is a more
plausible interpretation of personhood. Hence, the conclusion can be made that animals
such as monkeys should have the right to a significant level of moral consideration.
Immanuel Kant (1724 – 1804) was a German philosopher who held the idea that human
beings deserve absolute respect due to their rational autonomy and God-like attributes
(Imago Dei, in the image of God). As moral standing is determined by the capacity for reason
and self-governance, Kant believed that human beings have intrinsic value, whereas non-
human animals have instrumental value. Human beings are valued for themselves, while
non-human animals can be used for human purposes (this is similar to Descartes
proposition; however he claims that animals are merely 'mechanisms' or 'automata', being
complex physical machines without experiences, and thus being comparable to less complex
machines like cuckoo clocks or watches). However, Kant stated that it was wrong to be cruel
to animals, although this was simply because doing so would make it more likely that we
would harm other humans, or the animal could be the property of another human. In
summary, Kant holds that we only have duties to other rational agents, and as animals
aren't rational, they have no rights and no moral status of their own. This means we can use
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller RichardG. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $19.98. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
75632 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now