Factors affecting the accuracy of eyewitness testimony - misleading information
4 views 0 purchase
Course
Memory
Institution
AQA
Book
AQA Psychology for A Level Year 1 & AS - Student Book
Excellent class notes on factors affecting the accuracy of eyewitness testimony. These notes focus on misleading information and describes in detail the Loftus and Palmer car accident study as well as Fiona Gabbert's study of participants in pairs. Also includes 4 extensive evaluation paragraphs co...
Psychology – Factors affecting the accuracy of eyewitness testimony: Misleading
information:
Eyewitness testimony (EWT) – the ability of people to remember the details of events,
such as accidents and crimes, which they themselves have observed.
Leading questions - Questions which, because of the way they are phrased, suggest a
certain answer
One reason why the accuracy of EWT is often very poor, could be because of leading
questions, used by the police after the event:
Research on leading questions:
Experiment 1:
Aim: Elizabeth Loftus and John Palmer wanted to see the effect of language, upon
estimates of speed.
Procedure:
The participants were 45 students.
Each participant watched 7 films depicting a traffic accident.
After each film, each participant was given a questionnaire.
The first item on the questionnaire was simply asking students to give an account
of what they had seen.
The second part of the questionnaire was a series of specific questions about the
film.
The critical question was about the speed of the cars.
The blank was filled with one of the following words e.g. hit, smashed, collided,
bumped or contacted.
Findings – the mean estimated speed was calculated for each participant group. The
verb contacted resulted in a mean estimated speed of 31.8 mph and the verb smashed
resulted in a mean estimate of 40.5 mph.
Conclusion – the leading question biased the eyewitness’s recall of an event.
Experiment 2 (Loftus and Palmer):
Procedure:
150 students, in various sized groups participated.
A film lasting of a multiple car accident was shown, followed by a questionnaire.
Firstly, participants had to describe the accident in their own words.
Secondly, participants had to answer a series of questions about the accident.
The critical question was also about the speed of the vehicles.
50 participants were asked, ‘how fast the cars were going when they smashed
into each other?’
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller eviedequinceyadams. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $6.46. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
