100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Samenvatting Ramirez et al. $3.23   Add to cart

Summary

Samenvatting Ramirez et al.

 70 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Samenvatting van het artikel

Preview 1 out of 3  pages

  • April 8, 2018
  • 3
  • 2017/2018
  • Summary
avatar-seller
Ramirez et al.


ABSTRACT
In the current study, we explored whether math anxiety relates to young children’s math
achievement. One hundred and fifty-four first- and second-grade children (69 boys, 85 girls)
were given a measure of math achievement and working memory (WM). Several days later,
children’s math anxiety was assessed using a newly developed scale. Paralleling work with
adults (Beilock, 2008), we found a negative relation between math anxiety and math
achievement for children who were higher but not lower in WM. High-WM individuals tend to
rely on WM-intensive solution strategies, and these strategies are likely disrupted when WM
capacity is co-opted by math anxiety. We argue that early identification and treatment of
math anxieties is important because these early anxieties may snowball and eventually lead
students with the highest potential (i.e., those with higher WM) to avoid math courses and
math-related career choices.

WM kan gezien worden als een individuele variabele; de ene heeft het nu eenmaal meer dan
de ander. Dan zouden we stellen: hoe hoger de WM capaciteit, hoe hoger de prestaties op
bijvoorbeeld rekentaken.
 One might imagine that those with higher WM would be best equipped to deal with
the difficulties associated with anxiety in educational settings. Lower-WM individuals,
on the other hand, are thought to have limited capacity for problem computations to
begin with, which means that anxiety-induced consumption of WM may shrink this
available capacity below the level needed to successfully solve difficult math
problems.

Maar, er is ook een ander standpunt waar tegenwoordig veel bewijs voor wordt gevonden.
 Higher-WM individuals might be more prone to poor performance as a function of
math anxiety. If high-WM students rely heavily on problem-solving strategies that load
WM and math anxiety specifically targets the WM system, this may make high-WM
students’ performance susceptible to the impact of anxiety. In contrast, low-WM
students may rely on shortcuts or heuristic strategies to solve math problems
precisely because they cannot hold demanding problem-solving algorithms in WM.
Under this view, if anxiety negatively impacts the WM system, low-WM students
would in a sense have little or nothing to lose compared with high-WM students.
 In the absence of pressure, students with high WM outperformed low-WM students in
their problem-solving accuracy. However, when individuals were asked to solve a
similar block of math problems under high pressure, high-WM students’ math
performance fell to the level of those with low WM. Importantly, these effects were
limited to difficult math problems that required the most WM.

Hypothesen
 Based on these findings, we hypothesized that young children who are high in WM
may be most vulnerable to performing poorly in math as a function of self-reported
math anxiety. Hence, we predicted that if math anxiety exists among our young study
sample, it would be negatively associated with math achievement particularly among
high-WM children (Ackerman, 1988; Barrouillet & Le´pine, 2005). Furthermore, to
establish that our math anxiety measure relates specifically to math achievement and
is not simply a proxy measure for general academic anxiety, we asked students to
complete a measure of reading achievement as well as a measure of math
achievement. Our prediction was that higher-WM children would show a negative
relation between self-reported math anxiety and math but not reading achievement.

Results
 Child Math Anxiety Questionnaire
o Thus, children as early as first and second grade reported feeling ‘‘nervous’’
for various math-related situations, but these feelings of nervousness were not

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller aswwatkunjeermee. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $3.23. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

66579 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$3.23
  • (0)
  Add to cart