100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
Fritz braid defamation 109-111 summary $6.10
Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. University Of Cape Town (UCT)
  4.  
  5. Delict

Summary

Fritz braid defamation 109-111 summary

 2 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Delict
  • Institution
  • University Of Cape Town (UCT)
  • Book
  • Corpus delicti

Summary; With focus on fritz braid defamation * Comprehensive * Legible * For students

Preview 1 out of 2  pages

Document information

  • Yes
  • January 5, 2024
  • 2
  • 2020/2021
  • Summary

Subjects

  • summary

Connected book

book image

Book Title:

Author(s):

  • Edition:
  • ISBN:
  • Edition:

More summaries for

  • Negligence case law summary
All for this textbook (2)

Written for

  • University of Cape Town (UCT)
  • Delict
All documents for this subject (10)

Seller

avatar-seller
anyiamgeorge19

Reviews received

Content preview

INTRODUCTION

109NatureandscopeofthelawofdefamationThefoundationstonesofdelictualliabilityaretheAcquilianaction
andtheactioiniuriarum.1WhiletheactiolegisAcquiliaeisaimedattherecoveryofpatrimoniallossorfinancial
damagescausedbythewrongfulconductofanother,the actioiniuriarumistheappropriateremedyfortherecovery
ofcompensationasasolatiumforthewrongfulinvasionoftheindividual'spersonalrights.2Theactionfor
defamationisaspeciesofthegenusiniuria.3Itseekstoprotectoneofthepersonalrightstowhicheverypersonis
entitled,thatistherighttoagoodname,unimpairedreputationandesteembyothers.4Inournewconstitutional
order,reputationformspartoftheconceptofhumandignitywhichisafundamentalconstitutionalvalue. 5Inthe
resultthelawofdefamationliesattheintersectionoftwofundamentalvalues,bothprotectedbytheConstitution,6
namelytherighttofreedomofexpression,includingfreedomofthepressandothermedia,7andtheprotectionof
reputationorgoodname.8
Incommonwithallotherdelictsderivedfromtheactioiniuriarumtheprimaryobjectofdefamationproceedingsis
toenablethepersondefamedtovindicatehisorhercharacterbywayofcompensationasasolatiumforthe
damagedonetohisorhergoodnameintheformofgeneraldamages.9Specialdamagesforpatrimoniallosscan
onlybeclaimedundertheactiolegisAquiliae.Bothformsofdamagescanbeclaimedinthesameaction,provided
thattherequirementsofbotharesatisfied.10Athreateneddefamationorcontinueddefamationcanbeprevented
throughaninterdict.11
Defamationisalsoacrime.12Apartfromthecivilremediesofaninterdictoraclaimformonetarycompensationit
maythereforealsogiverisetocriminalprosecution.Atsomestageinthepastamatterofsomecontroversyrelated
towhethertheseriousnessofthedefamationisanelementofthecrimeorwhethereventrivialdefamationis
criminal,butshould,asamatterofpolicy,notbeprosecuted.13Thatcontroversyhasnowbeensettledinfavourof
thelastmentionedpointofview.14Seriousnessisthereforenotanelementofthecrime.
1 McKerronDelict10.
2 SeeegMatthewsvYoung1922AD492,DieSpoorbondvSARailways;VanHeerdenvSARailways
1946AD9991011;Neethling,PotgieterandVisserLawofDelict5.
3 LeRouxvDey(FreedomofExpressionInstitute&RestorativeJusticeCentreasamicicuriae)20116
BCLR577(CC);20113SA274(CC)141.
4 DeVilliersInjuries24referredtowithapprovalinArgusPrinting&PublishingCoLtdvEsselen'sEstate
19942AllSA160(A);19942SA1(A)23DIandthecasestherecited.
5 S e e  e g HolomisavArgusNewspapersLtd1 9 9 6  1  A l l  S A  4 7 8  ( W ); 1 9 9 6  6  B C L R  8 3 6  ( W );
19962SA588(W)606EF;NationalMediaLtdvBogoshi19984AllSA347(SC A); 19991BCLR1
(SCA); 1 9 9 8  4  S A  1 1 9 6(SCA)1216J 1217B;KhumalovHolomisa2 0 0 2  8  B C L R  7 7 1  ( C C );
20025SA401(CC)418F419D;andseetitleCONSTITUTIONALLAW.
6 ConstitutionoftheRepublicofSA,108of1996.
7 S16.
8 KhumalovHolomisasupra.
9 UpingtonvSaulSolomon&Co(1879)9Buch204260;ArgusPrinting&PublishingCoLtdvEsselen's
Estatesupra;Media24LtdvSATaxiSecuritisation(Pty)Ltd20114AllSA9(SCA);20115SA329
(SCA)8.
10 Media24LtdvSATaxiSecuritisation(Pty)Ltdsupra8and9.Althoughtheissuewasleftopenin
CaxtonLtdvReevaForeman(Pty)Ltd19902AllSA300(A);19903SA547(A)560I561A,itwas
finallydecidedinMedia24LtdvSATaxiSecuritisationsupra8and9.
11 SeeegVorstervStrydpersBpk19731AllSA30(T);19722SA928(T);HixNetworkingTechnologies
vSystemPublishers(Pty)Ltd19964AllSA675(A); 19971SA391(A).Astothequestionwhether
theremedyofamendehonorablewherethedefendantisorderedtoretractandapologiseisstill
partofourlaw,seeMineworkersInvestmentCo(Pty)LtdvModibane20026SA512(W)522B527A;
YoungvShaikh20043SA46(C)56H57G;HvW20132AllSA218(GSJ);20135BCLR554(GSJ);
20132SA530(GSJ).Seealsopar136post;seetitleINTERDICT.
12 SeeegSvHoho20091AllSA103(SCA); 20091SACR276(SCA)1536;MiltonSouthAfrican
CriminalLawandProcedureVol2(3ed)ch27;SnymanStrafreg(4ed)473etseq.
13 SeeegRvFuleza19511AllSA420(A);19511SA519(A)525EF(VandenHeeverJA)ontheone
hand;and529(HoexterJA)and532EG(FaganJA)ontheother.
14 SvHohosupra36.



110SourcesofthelawofdefamationTheSouthAfricanlawofdefamationisderivedfromtheRomanand
RomanDutchlawofiniuriae.1
ThecourtsinSouthAfricahavefromtheearliesttimesattemptedtoapplyRomanDutchprinciples.2Theyhave
assertedtheseparateidentityoftheSouthAfricanlawofdefamationanditsdifferenthistoricalroots,andhavein
generalattemptedtoresisttheimportationofaspectsofEnglishlawwhichconflictwithRomanDutchprinciples.3
However,conceptsofEnglishlawwhichwereconsideredcompatiblewiththeprinciplesofRomanDutchlawwere
adopted,4andthecourtshave"forthesakeofconvenienceofexpression"madeuseoftheterminologyusedin
Englishlawdecisions.5DecisionsoftheEnglishcourtscontinuetobeinvokedwheretheymayillustrategeneral
principlesofthelawofdefamationorexplainconceptsadoptedinSouthAfricanlaw.6
1 VoetCommentarius4710deiniuriisetfamosislibellisinparticularhasbeenfrequentlyinvoked;see
GaneTheSelectiveVoet7201.SeealsoDeVilliersInjuries.Thederivationhasbeenacknowledged
b y interaliosWesselsJAinNasionalePersBpkvLong1930AD8799andSchreinerJAinDie
SpoorbondvSARailways,VanHeerdenvSARailways1946AD9991010.SeealsoMaraisvRichard
19811SA1157(A)1166andBurchellDefamationchs23.
2 SeeegMackayvPhilip(1830)1M455462.
3 Thusthecourtsdonotdistinguishbetweenlibelandslander;seeegANicolsonvARoberts(1904)25

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller anyiamgeorge19. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $6.10. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

49497 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$6.10
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added