100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Psychopathology full notes $9.76   Add to cart

Class notes

Psychopathology full notes

 8 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Psychology a level AQA notes

Preview 2 out of 14  pages

  • January 9, 2024
  • 14
  • 2023/2024
  • Class notes
  • Na
  • All classes
avatar-seller
Definitions of abnormality, including deviation from social norms, failure to function
adequately, statistical infrequency and deviation from ideal mental health.
● The Statistical infrequency definition of abnormality states that abnormal behaviour is
behaviour that is very rare.
● Statistics are how we measure how common behaviours or traits are when measured in
comparison to the rest of the population. The most uncommon ones are defined a
abnormal.
● For example low IQ is when someone’s intelligence is two standard deviations from the
average. Just 2.28% of the population have low IQ. It is an objective measure of
individuals needing support.
Evaluation
★ Not all statistically infrequent traits are negative. This definition would include high IQ,
but whilst this is statistically rare it is also highly desirable.
★ Where the cut-off point falls results in some people receiving treatment and some not, so
deciding where to put the cut-off is subjective.
★ Some psychopathologies such as depression and anxiety are quite common. Around 1
in 6 adults (17%) surveyed in England by the NHS met the criteria for a common mental
health disorder (CMD) in 2014. The statistical infrequency definition does not match with
the high incidence of mental health disorders within society.

Failure to function adequately
● Failure to function adequately is inability to cope with daily life (interacting with the world
and people around us).
● Rosenhan and Seligman (1989) suggested the following features of failure to function
adequately:
1. Maladaptive behaviour- this is when individuals behave in ways that are against
their long-term interests (i.e: self-harm or unhealthy eating patterns).
2. Personal anguish- suffering from anxiety and distress because of their inability
to cope.
3. Observer discomfort- The person’s behaviour causes distress to the people
around them (i.e: poor personal hygiene or not respecting personal space).
4. Irrationality and unpredictability- behaviour that is hard to understand and/or
seems uncontrolled
5. Unconventionality- behaviours go against normal expectations.
Marbled pigs often irritate uncle
Evaluation
★ Deciding whether an individual is coping or not is a subjective judgement that is affected
by the opinions of the observer, so two observers may not rate a person in the same
way (potential low inter-rater reliability).
★ Some abnormal behaviour is not linked to an inability to cope or intense distress. It is
thought that there are many psychopaths that may be more able to function in certain
roles in society, which may be at the detriment of people other than themselves.

, ★ Not all maladaptive behaviour is an indication of mental illness. For example, smoking
and poor diet are seen as against a person’s long-term interests in their personal health,
but neither of these behaviours are assumed to constitute mental illness.
★ However failure to function does respect and recognises the patient’s own lived
experiences and perspective, which statistical infrequency and deviation from social
norms cannot really address.

Deviation from social norms
● Social norms are unwritten social expectations of behaviour that may differ from
one culture to the next. They often change over time and vary depending on the
context.
● Therefore according to this definition, those who deviate from the society's’ expectations
will be seen as abnormal ‘social deviants’.
● An issue with this explanation of mental illness is that, as norms are a group judgement
on what is acceptable, certain behaviours in one culture that are considered acceptable
may be considered deviant in another culture (i.e: homosexuality, face/hair covering,
queuing, chopsticks, public displays of emotions).
Evaluation
★ It respects cultural differences by not imposing a set definition of abnormality (avoids
western ethnocentrism that would cause other cultures to be viewed as abnormal).
★ It is a clear definition of what is and is not abnormal whilst also taking context into
consideration.
★ Different social classes within the same society may have different social norms. This
could, for example, result in an overdiagnosis of mental health problems in those of
working class backgrounds if most of the psychiatrists are from middle or upper class
backgrounds.
★ Can create problems for people living in a culture that is different from their culture of
origin. For example Cochrane (see the schizophrenia topic) suggests that the there is
7x higher diagnosis rate of schizophrenia for people from Afro-caribbean heritage living
in the UK compared to those native to the UK living in the UK or those native to the
Caribbean who are living there. Fernando considers this to be a “category failure” that
has occurred due to western definitions of mental illness being applied onto non-western
cultures, specifically how hallucinations and religious experiences are interpreted.
★ This definition can result in society imposing punishments to unconventional mentally
healthy people for expressing their individuality, which is unethical

Deviation from ideal mental health
● Marie Jahoda (1958) uses humanist principles in not defining abnormality but defining
six features of ideal mental health, suggesting that deviation from these features would
indicate an abnormality. To remember the six features we use the acronym EAR SPA.
1. Environmental mastery- competent in meeting the demands of situations.
Involves flexible thinking.
2. Autonomy- able to act independently of others and rely on their own abilities.
3. Resisting stress- able to cope with the anxiety caused by the demands of life.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller dpower111. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $9.76. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

75057 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$9.76
  • (0)
  Add to cart