Summary

Summary Similarities and Differences of studies - A level Psychology OCR Paper 2 (Core Studies)

0 purchase

Course
A2 Unit G542 - Core Studies

Institution
OCR

This document includes comparisons of all 20 studies that are assessed within the Core Studies paper in the OCR Paper 2 Psychology A level exam. It includes 4 studies per 5 areas, each area with 2 comparisons: Social, Developmental, Cognitive, Biological and Individual Differences. The similarities...

[Show more]

Preview 1 out of 4 pages

View example

Uploaded on January 11, 2024
Number of pages 4
Written in 2022/2023
Type Summary

core studies
psychpsychology
a level
college
ocr
ocr psychology
ocr psych
as level

Study Level
A/AS Level
Examinator
OCR
Subject
Psychology
Unit
A2 Unit G542 - Core Studies

hali0987

Member since 2 year 48 documents sold

$13.26

Add to cart

Save

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Similarity and Difference revision grid
Milgram and Bocchiaro Piliavin and Levine Bandura and Chaney Kohlberg and Lee
Similar because both Similar because both Similar because Similar because
Use volunteer sampling Use Opportunity sampling Both produced quant data Low ecological validity

For example in Milgram For example in Piliavin For example in Bandura For example in Kohlberg
Adverts were placed in newspaper Used the 4450 passengers who were E.g. amount of imitative/partial/non- the moral dilemmas were hypothetical. In
and direct mail for ppts to a study on using the subway trains at the time to imitative aggression shown by the the real world, children face real moral
memory and learning. measure levels of helping. children dilemmas to which their responses have
real consequences
Similarly, in Bocchiaro Similarly, in Levine Similarly, Chaney Similarly, Lee
Adverts/flyers were placed in a They used the people on the streets of E.g. % of children and parents who hypothetical lie/truth telling stories. In the
cafeteria at VU university, the cities at the time of the helping successfully administered medication real world, children are judging the actual
Amsterdam. scenarios (e.g., dropped pen) to see using each inhaler type (standard lies and truths their friends tell to teachers,
who helps. inhaler/Funhaler) and the antisocial/prosocial deeds their
friends actually carry out in the classroom
Different because Different because Different because Different because
Of generalisability to both males and Of the data collected Research method used Of the data collected
females

For example in Milgram For example in Piliavin For example, Bandura For example, Kohlberg
The sample was biased as only males BOTH quant (e.g. % of trials Lab experiment: IV – behaviour of model Qualitative – as the boys explained what
were in the sample of 40, aged 20- spontaneous help received) and qual (aggressive/non-aggressive); sex of the character in the hypothetical moral
50yrs. Not representative of females data (comments from passengers on model; sex of child. DV – amount of dilemmas should do
so couldn’t generalise findings about why not help) was collected. imitative/partial/non-imitative
obedience to females. aggression. Controlled environment and
standardised routine of aggression
In contrast to this, in Bocchiaro’s However, in Levine However, Chaney However, Lee
Both males and females were in the Only quant data was used e.g. the % Field experiment: IV – type of device used Mainly Quantitative – as the children rated
sample of 149 students – no gender of help received in the different cities to administer the asthma drugs the antisocial and prosocial deed and the
bias - could generalise findings about for comparison. (standard/Funhaler). DV – amount of lie/truth on a 7 point scale
obedience and whistleblowing to both adherence to the prescribed medical
males and females. regime. Natural environment as inhalers
taken in the ppt’s home

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller hali0987. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $13.26. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

65539 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 15 years now

Start selling

Summary

Summary Similarities and Differences of studies - A level Psychology OCR Paper 2 (Core Studies)

Document information

Subjects

Written for

Seller

Reviews received

Content preview