Public Law - Irrationality revision notes (semester 2)
9 views 0 purchase
Course
Public Law (LAW106)
Institution
The University Of Liverpool (UoL)
Documents containing all the relevant information about the topic, condensed into colour coded tables to enable easier memorisation and order. I achieved a first class in public law using these notes.
“Judicial review has I think developed to a stage today when…one can conveniently classify
under three heads the grounds upon which administrative action is subject to control by
judicial review.
• The first ground I would call ‘illegality,’
• the second ‘irrationality’ and
• the third "procedural impropriety.’”
(Lord Diplock in the GCHQ case)
IRRATIONALITY – WEDNESBURY
ISSUE: The issue in this scenario is under the ground of what Diplock in the GCHQ case
called, ‘irrationality’.
“I mean what can by now be succinctly referred to as... ‘unreasonableness’ ...a
decision which is...outrageous in its defiance of logic or of accepted moral
standards” (GCHQ)
ARTICULATE LEGAL TEST Applies to a decision which is so outrageous in its defiance of
logic or of accepted moral standards that no sensible person
who had applied his mind to the question to be decided could
have arrived at it
If a decision on a competent matter is so unreasonable that
no reasonable authority could ever have come to it, then the
courts can interfere
AUTHORITY FOR TEST GCHQ
Wednesbury
Diplock made the first comments in the GCHQ case
which just paraphrased the Wednesbury test, and he
then immediately cited the Wednesbury test
THRESHOLD AND Wednesbury questions if judges should interfere with
VARIABILITY merit at all and shows the limited allowance that they
can interfere
Courts have been tempted to move the usual very high
threshold both ways (less and more)
“Super-Wednesbury” – less intense threshold – court will not
intervene unless the unreasonableness reaches the extremes
of absurdity
“Anxious scrutiny” – more intense threshold – whether the
decision maker thought sufficiently about the case
VULNERABILITY Wednesbury may not continue to be law in the future
THEN APPLY TO FACTS OF PROBLEM QUESTION!!!
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller miaalunt. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $3.86. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
