100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Public Law - Ombudsman revision notes (semester 2) $3.91   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

Public Law - Ombudsman revision notes (semester 2)

 10 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Documents containing all the relevant information about the topic, condensed into colour coded tables to enable easier memorisation and order. I achieved a first class in public law using these notes.

Preview 2 out of 6  pages

  • January 14, 2024
  • 6
  • 2022/2023
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
  • Unknown
avatar-seller
Non-legal redress: the ombudsman


NON-LEGAL REDRESS – THE OMBUDSMAN

WHAT IS AN A person appointed to hear and investigate complaints
OMBUDSMAN??? and give those complaints a dedicated institutional
outlook

Parliamentary Commissioner Act 1967
(1) For the purpose of conducting investigations in
accordance with the following provisions of this
Act there shall be appointed a Commissioner, to be
known as the Parliamentary Commissioner for
Administration

BACKGROUND OF THE Judicial review was inaccessible and narrow and political
OMBUDSMAN mechanisms were limited too

The motivation for the creation of the ombudsman was
the ‘continuous flow of relatively minor complaints, not
sufficient in themselves to attract public interest but
nevertheless of great importance to individuals’ (JUSTICE
para 76)

 Created in response to demand for redress as
there was a ‘gap’ that the government couldn’t fill
 Doesn’t fully capture reality as the issue can be
extremely serious but still fit into this ‘gap’

ACCESS TO THE COST – free!!!
OMBUDSMAN  Access to administrative justice is free compared
to legal justice being extremely expensive

SOCIAL FACTORS: AWARENESS AND WILLINGNESS
The Ombudsman in 2012 said that people felt making was
a complaint was ‘difficult or felt it didn’t make a
difference’

This could be reasons such as:
 Difficult to find out where/how as you cannot
invoke the ombudsman directly through a website
or anything
 Fear of worse service – may make people resent
you and get a worse service
 Doubts about effectiveness/authenticity – very
often to assume that complaints procedures don’t
do anything, and they are just there so people can
complain so it looks like the state are doing
something about redress

, Non-legal redress: the ombudsman


THE ’MP FILTER’
PCA 1967 section 5 explains how the ombudsman sits
behind the MP filter which is the idea that if you want to
invoke the ombudsman you can just directly ask them,
you have ask/invoke an MP first
 The law says that ‘any MP’ will do however
conventions say that you have to use your own
constituency MP

The political background reason for the MP filter is that
the ombudsman is complementary to parliamentary
accountability procedures
 Organised as an agent of parliament rather than a
stand-alone body so parliament remains at the
centre
 This was meant to be a temporary transitional
agreement for 5 years and then after this the
ombudsman would be able to be directly invoked
but Gordon said that the MP filter (even though it
is highly contested and disliked) became
‘imbedded within the system’

THE JURISTICION OF THE Schedule 2 contains the list of bodies that the
OMBUDSMAN ombudsman can investigate which is similar to the judicial
review concept of amenability

Schedule 3 contains the list of excluded matters which is
only a small exclusions and the standard complaints will
normally not include these exclusions

Section 5 of the PCA gives the statutory terms which
define the power of the ombudsman –
MALADMINISTRATION AND INJUSTICE

MALADMINISTRATION Crossman attempted to define maladministration as ‘bias,
neglect, inattention, delay, incompetence, inaptitude,
perversity, turpitude, arbitrariness and so on.’

The ombudsman established a list of what should be done
correctly and if these are not done then there is
maladministration:
 Getting it right
 Being customer focused
 Being open and accountable
 Acting fairly and proportionately
 Putting things right
 Seeking continuous improvement

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller miaalunt. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $3.91. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

79202 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$3.91
  • (0)
  Add to cart