This is a summary of the text you need to read (Bourdieu) for the study of social work literature course AND the class notes/notes. In the document, you will also find frameworks where the terms are further explained.
Discussion 3: Bourdieu
General information about Bourdieu and the chapters:
Pierre Bourdieu was a highly influential French sociologist, anthropologist, and philosopher, known for his extensive
work on sociology, cultural theory, and education. Born on August 1, 1930, in France, he became one of the most
renowned and influential figures in the field of sociology, particularly in the latter half of the 20th century. His body
of work revolutionized social theory and had a profound impact on various disciplines within the social sciences.
Bourdieu's writings often focused on the dynamics of power, social hierarchies, and the influence of cultural and
social capital on an individual's life trajectory. His concepts have laid the groundwork for understanding how society
operates, emphasizing the significance of one's social background, habitus, and social capital in shaping behavior,
preferences, and opportunities.
The text above encapsulates some of the key ideas and themes found in Bourdieu's work:
Habitus and Field Theory: Bourdieu's concept of habitus refers to the set of dispositions, inclinations, and
behavioral patterns that individuals acquire through socialization and experience within their particular social
context. His field theory explores the interactions between these dispositions (habitus) and the social spaces
(fields) within which individuals operate, emphasizing the interplay between personal dispositions and the
institutional positions individuals occupy.
Bureaucratic Institutions and Dispositions: Bourdieu's exploration of bureaucratic institutions, such as civil
services, delves into how individuals' inherent dispositions interact with the demands and expectations set
by such institutions. He highlights that the functioning of these institutions isn't solely shaped by their
structure but also by the dispositions and behaviors of the agents within them.
Perceptions and Responses to Working Conditions: His analysis of how different groups of workers perceive
and respond to changing working conditions is a reflection of his interest in the impact of social backgrounds
and habitus on individuals' behaviors and attitudes within various social structures.
Bourdieu's work, often complex and deeply theoretical, significantly contributed to sociology, education, and cultural
studies, offering a lens through which to analyze social interactions, power dynamics, and the influence of social
backgrounds on individual behavior and societal structures. He passed away on January 23, 2002, leaving a lasting
legacy through his influential body of work that continues to shape social theory and research.
(Habitus: Definition: Habitus refers to the system of dispositions, ingrained habits, and acquired
norms that shape an individual's perceptions, behaviors, and beliefs. It is formed by
socialization and influences individuals' understanding of the social world.
Explanation: Bourdieu proposed that individuals' actions and choices are shaped by their
habitus, which forms a lens through which they perceive the world and respond to it.
Habitus is a result of one's social and cultural experiences, influencing their taste, beliefs,
and behaviors.
Field: Definition: A field is a social arena or a structured system of social relations where
individuals or groups compete for various forms of capital (economic, social, cultural, etc.).
Explanation: Bourdieu introduced the idea that fields, such as academic fields, artistic fields,
or political fields, are spaces of social struggle where individuals or groups compete for
dominance, recognition, and influence. Fields have their rules and hierarchies.
Cultural Capital: Definition: Cultural capital refers to the non-economic assets that aid social mobility,
including knowledge, skills, education, and cultural competencies.
Explanation: Bourdieu emphasized the significance of cultural capital in social reproduction,
as it often gives advantages to those who possess it, facilitating upward social mobility and
reproducing social inequalities.
Symbolic Violence: Definition: Symbolic violence refers to the subtle, often subconscious, ways in which
dominant groups impose their norms, values, and beliefs on subordinated groups, causing
them to accept and reproduce their own subordination.
Explanation: Bourdieu argued that symbolic violence occurs when individuals unknowingly
1
, accept and internalize the dominant norms and values of society, reinforcing social
hierarchies without direct coercion.
Social Definition: Social reproduction refers to the processes by which the social structure,
Reproduction: inequalities, and social hierarchies are passed down from one generation to the next.
Explanation: Bourdieu explored how social inequalities are reproduced and maintained over
time, focusing on the perpetuation of class, cultural, and educational advantages or
disadvantages across generations.
The text: Pierre Bourdieu – Men and machines
Summary of the chapters
The text discusses the final chapter of a book, emphasizing the concept of (macro) structures as a collection of
positions sustained by various forces. It presents the idea of these structures being maintained through the interplay
of forces that either support or oppose them, similar to the stability of a physical body explained by motion rather
than endurance or persistence.
Bourdieu, a key figure in the discussion, highlights the significance of power, viewing it not as a force stemming from
a central actor but as arising from the actions and reactions of agents struggling to uphold their specific position in a
social field. These struggles create constraints, subjecting actors to often unbearable conditions, thereby reinforcing
certain structural divisions in society.
Bourdieu's contribution is placed at the end because it concentrates primarily on a macro-level perspective, rejecting
the distinction between action and structure. It proposes viewing the present in terms of two histories: the frozen,
objectified past displayed in positions and the embodied history apparent in an individual's dispositions or habitus.
Both positions and dispositions are shaped by socialization within a group or class. Individuals may either inherently
act out an objectified history or actively engage in investments that incline them to take an interest in institutional
functionalities.
(Macro)structurres These are portrayed as a collection of positions sustained by various forces, akin to the
stability of a physical body explained by motions instead of internal endurance or external
persistence. It emphasizes how these structures are maintained by the interplay of various
forces that either support or oppose them.
Macro-level Bourdieu's contribution places the problem primarily on a macro-level, rejecting distinctions
perspective between action and structure. It proposes two histories: the frozen, objectified past
manifested in positions and the embodied history visible in an individual's habitus or
dispositions. Both positions and dispositions are social in nature, acquired through group or
class socialization, leading individuals to either enact an objectified history or invest in
inclinations towards institutional functionality.
Power Bourdieu emphasizes the notion of power not as stemming from a central prime mover but
emerging from the actions and reactions of agents struggling to maintain their specific
capital within a social field. This struggle subjects others to intolerable constraints,
maintaining certain structural conditions and societal divisions.
1. Macro-structures as fields of struggle: P305
Macro-Structures as Fields of Struggle:
The fallacy commonly committed by social scientists is their failure to account for the specific relationship a scientist
holds with the object of study. They often project academic constructs into the object of study, misunderstanding the
logic of things for the things of logic, as Marx once criticized Hegel for. This leads to misconceptions within action
theories and philosophies of history, like the rational actor theory and functionalism, which misrepresent the
interplay between individual actions and societal structures.
2
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller femkeff. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $6.95. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
