This is a summary of the texts you need to read (Gramsci, Latour, Fanon, Bourdieu, Hoosk) for the study of social work literature course AND the notes/notes of the lessons. In the document, you will also find frameworks where the terms are further explained.
Discussion 1: Gramsci
General information about Gramsci and the chapters:
Antonio Gramsci (1891-1937) was a prominent Italian Marxist philosopher and political theorist, known for his
contributions to the concept of cultural hegemony and his ideas about power and social change. His most famous
work is the "Prison Notebooks," which were written during his imprisonment by the Fascist regime in Italy. These
notebooks contain a wide range of ideas and discussions on various topics related to politics, culture, and society. He
is best known for his contributions to Marxist theory, particularly his development of the concept of "cultural
hegemony" and his ideas on how political power is established and maintained through culture, education, and
ideology.
Intellectual Background:
Gramsci was influenced by various intellectual and political currents of his time, including Marxism, Italian
nationalism, and the works of thinkers like Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. He was a founding member of the Italian
Communist Party (PCI).
Imprisonment and Writing:
Gramsci's most significant works were written during his imprisonment by the Fascist regime in Italy from 1926 to
1937. He wrote extensively in prison, producing his famous "Prison Notebooks."
"Prison Notebooks":
The text "Prison Notebooks," is a collection of writings that encompass his thoughts on various topics, including
politics, culture, ideology, and philosophy. These notebooks were intended as an intellectual exploration of Marxism
and the dynamics of power.
Common Sense and Philosophy:
Gramsci delves into the concept of "common sense" and its relationship with philosophy. He argues that any attempt
to develop a philosophy for the masses should start with a critical analysis of common sense, which is the
unreflective worldview held by average individuals.
Influence of Religion and Culture:
Gramsci highlights the influence of religion and culture on common sense and the need to construct a new common
sense rooted in the changing social and cultural conditions. He also discusses how religion and previous cultural
elements continue to shape common sense.
Role of Philosophy of Praxis:
Gramsci introduces the concept of the "philosophy of praxis" as an alternative philosophy rooted in the practical
experiences of the masses. He suggests that this philosophy could offer a transformative approach to ideology and
culture.
Legacy:
Antonio Gramsci's ideas have had a lasting impact on critical theory, cultural studies, and political thought. His
concepts of hegemony, cultural struggle, and the relationship between ideology and power continue to be influential
in contemporary social and political discussions.
1
,The text:
Summary of the chapters
1. "The Formation of the Intellectuals": P134 - 147
This chapter explores Gramsci's ideas about the role and formation of intellectuals in society. Gramsci argues that
intellectuals play a crucial role in shaping the dominant ideology and maintaining the status quo. He distinguishes
between traditional intellectuals and organic intellectuals.
o The concept of traditional intellectuals and their role in perpetuating hegemony.
o The emergence of organic intellectuals and their potential to challenge established power structures.
o The relationship between intellectuals and social movements.
In this text, Gramsci delves into the complex question of the formation and role of intellectuals in society. He
discusses whether intellectuals form an autonomous and independent social group or if each social group has its own
specialized category of intellectuals. The chapter presents various key terms, concepts, and insights:
1. Traditional vs. Organic Intellectuals:
o Gramsci distinguishes between traditional intellectuals and organic intellectuals. Traditional intellectuals are
typically tied to the ruling class and maintain the status quo, while organic intellectuals emerge from various
social groups and may challenge the existing order.
2. Formation of Intellectuals:
o Every social group, arising from an essential function in economic production, creates one or more strata of
intellectuals that align with its interests in the economic, social, and political fields.
o For example, the capitalist entrepreneur creates industrial technicians, specialists in political economy, and
organizers of culture and legal systems alongside themselves.
3. Crisis of Authority:
o Gramsci touches on how capitalism can lead to a crisis of authority, disrupting traditional forms of authority
and morality. This crisis prompts a re-evaluation of societal norms and values.
4. Ecclesiastics as Traditional Intellectuals:
o One of the most typical categories of traditional intellectuals in history is that of ecclesiastics. They held a
monopoly on various services, including religious ideology, education, and morality. The ecclesiastics were
closely tied to the landed aristocracy.
5. The Role of Intellectuals in Society:
o Gramsci emphasizes that intellectuals play an essential role in shaping society, both in maintaining the
existing power structures and in challenging and transforming them.
o The relationship between intellectuals and society is mediated by various superstructures and complex
societal relations.
6. Democratization of Education:
o The text discusses the expansion of intellectual functions and categories, especially in modern democracies.
The growth of education at all levels reflects the importance of intellectual functions in contemporary
societies.
2
,7. Complex Gradation of Intellectual Functions:
o Intellectual activities vary in their nature and degree of involvement in muscular-nervous effort. Gramsci
argues that there is no clear line dividing intellectuals from non-intellectuals, as most individuals engage in
some form of intellectual activity.
8. The Relationship Between Intellectuals and Production:
o Intellectuals do not have a direct relationship with the world of production as fundamental social groups do.
Their connection is mediated through societal superstructures, such as civil society and political society.
9. Expanding Concept of Intellectuals:
o The concept of intellectuals has expanded significantly in the modern world, particularly in democratic-
bureaucratic systems. A wide range of functions has emerged, not all of which are directly related to
production but serve the political interests of the dominant group.
10. Standardization and Competition:
o Mass formation and standardization of individuals have led to phenomena like competition among
intellectuals, the need for professional defense organizations, unemployment, and overproduction in
educational institutions.
Discussion Points:
Autonomy of Intellectuals: Is there such a thing as an autonomous and independent intellectual? How do
intellectuals' backgrounds and affiliations shape their perspectives and roles in society?
o Gramsci suggests that intellectuals are not entirely autonomous but are shaped by their backgrounds
and affiliations. Intellectuals often reflect the values and interests of their social class or group.
The Role of Intellectuals in Shaping Ideology: Discuss how intellectuals contribute to the formation and
dissemination of ideologies and worldviews.
o Intellectuals play a crucial role in shaping and disseminating ideologies and worldviews. They help
translate abstract ideas into practical terms and influence how people perceive the world.
Intellectuals in Contemporary Society: Explore the relevance of Gramsci's ideas in today's world, considering the
role of intellectuals in politics, culture, and technology.
o Gramsci's ideas remain relevant today, especially considering the influence of intellectuals in politics,
media, and technology. Their perspectives continue to shape public discourse and cultural narratives.
Democratization of Education: Analyze the impact of the expansion of education and the proliferation of
intellectual roles in contemporary society.
o The expansion of education has led to a proliferation of intellectual roles. This has both positive and
negative effects, as it can empower individuals but also create competition and homogenization in
intellectual pursuits.
The Mediation of Intellectuals: Examine how intellectuals' roles are mediated by societal superstructures, and
how they function as "deputies" for the dominant social group.
o Intellectuals often serve as intermediaries or "deputies" for dominant social groups. They help maintain
or challenge the status quo by framing ideas in ways that resonate with broader society.
Challenges of Standardization: Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of standardization and competition
among intellectuals in modern societies.
o Standardization can lead to efficiency and accessibility in education and intellectual fields, but it may also
stifle creativity and diversity of thought. Competition among intellectuals can drive innovation but might
prioritize popular ideas over critical ones.
3
, Question: are intellectuals an autonomous and independent social group, or does every social group have its own
particular specialised category of intellectuals?
Zijn intellectuelen een autonome en onafhankelijke sociale groep, of heeft elke sociale groep zijn eigen specifieke
gespecialiseerde categorie intellectuelen?
Elke sociale groep, die tot stand komt op het oorspronkelijke terrein van een essentiële functie in de wereld
van de economische productie, creëert samen met zichzelf, op organische wijze, een of meer lagen van
intellectuelen die haar homogeniteit en bewustzijn geven van haar eigen functie, niet alleen in de
economische wereld. maar ook op sociaal en politiek gebied.
De ondernemer moet een richtinggevende en technische capaciteit bezitten (voor de economische
productie).
Organische intellectuelen: die elke nieuwe klasse naast zichzelf creëert en uitwerkt in de loop van haar
ontwikkeling, voor het grootste deel specialisaties zijn van deelaspecten van de primitieve activiteit van het
nieuwe sociale type dat de nieuwe klasse heeft ontwikkeld.
De vorming van intellectuelen in de feodale wereld en in de daaraan voorafgaande klassieke wereld is een
vraagstuk dat afzonderlijk moet worden onderzocht.
Iedere essentiële sociale groep die uit de voorafgaande economische structuur in de geschiedenis naar voren
komt, en als uitdrukking van een ontwikkeling van deze structuur, kent de geschiedenis categorieën van
intellectuelen.
De meest typerende van deze categorieën intellectuelen is die van de geestelijken die lange tijd het
monopolie hadden op een aantal belangrijke diensten: de religieuze ideologie, dat wil zeggen de filosofie en
de wetenschap van die tijd, samen met scholen, onderwijs, moraliteit, gerechtigheid, liefdadigheid, goede
werken…
o Deze categorie geestelijken kan worden beschouwd als de categorie intellectuelen die organisch
verbonden zijn met de landaristocratie.
o Traditionele intellectuelen, via esprit de corps hun ononderbroken historische continuïteit en hun
bijzondere kwalificatie ervan, stellen zij zichzelf op als autonome en onafhankelijk van de dominante
groep. Het is een sociale utopie waarmee de intellectuelen zichzelf beschouwen als onafhankelijk,
autonoom, begiftigd met een eigen karakter enz.
Vraag: wat zijn de maximale grenzen voor acceptatie van de term intellectueel?
o Zoeken naar de intrinsieke aard van intellectuele activiteit, in plaats van het geheel van het systeem
van relaties waarin deze activiteiten (en dus de intellectuele groepen die ze personifiëren) hebben
hun plaats binnen het algemene complex van sociale relaties.
Trained gorilla: Taylors metafoor om een grens in een bepaalde richting aan te geven; bij elk
fysiek werk, zelfs het meest gedegradeerde en mechanische, bestaat er een minimum aan
technische kwalificatie, dat wil zeggen een minimum aan creatieve intellectuele activiteit).
We hebben al opgemerkt dat de ondernemer, moet op grond van zijn functie tot op zekere
hoogte over een bepaald aantal kwalificaties van intellectuele aard beschikken, hoewel zijn
aandeel in de SL niet hierdoor wordt bepaald, maar door de algemene sociale verhoudingen
die specifiek de positie van de ondernemer binnen de industrie kenmerken. (Repititieve
handelingen).
Een trained gorilla is dus gemakkelijk te vervangen (door machines)
4
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller femkeff. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $14.77. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
