100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
European Constitutional Law and Fundamental Rights Lecture Notes $16.62   Add to cart

Class notes

European Constitutional Law and Fundamental Rights Lecture Notes

 9 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Lecture notes for the course European Constitutional Law and Fundamental Rights. This course is a 12 credit mandatory course of the Master European Union Law.

Preview 4 out of 60  pages

  • January 19, 2024
  • 60
  • 2023/2024
  • Class notes
  • Thomas vandamme
  • All classes
avatar-seller
Lectures: European Constitutional Law & Fundamental Rights


Week 1: The European Constitution in Crisis?
The EU “Constitution”
Does the EU have a constitution?
● Different views of what is a constitution
○ Functional
- A set of rules describing how power should be exercised
- In this context, the EU does have a constitution → Treaties


○ Normative
- Does it describe how powers should be exercised?
- Is there a set of rules that is based on: a) Separation of powers
- ART 4-6 TFEU → Vertical
(between EU & MS’s)
- ART 13 TEU → Horizontal
(between institutions)
b) Democracy
- ART 10(1) (2) TEU
- Voting in EP
- MS Parliaments
c) Fundamental Rights
- ART 6 TEU, Charter (binding)
- Accession ECHR
d) Rule of Law?
- ART 2 TEU, ART 19 TEU
- Values of the EU
- Access to independent Court
that ensures the law is applied
- CJEU observes the law
● Position of the CJEU clear → Les Verts (para 23)
○ “Treaties are the constitutional charter of the Union”
- How power must be exercised


The EU Constitution & Federal(?) Nature of the EU
The EU constitution constitutes an entity that is heavily interlinked with its component parts (MS’s)
- EU is boss over MS’s but also MS’s are boss over the EU


EU & Federalism
System based on self rule & shared rule with at least 2 levels of government who each operate on
the basis of their constitution → The EU cannot be a state

,Federal Origins
● Foedus → Contract (between whom?)
○ International Contract between sovereign states
- States as contracting parties → Would lead to peace


Federalism Today
● US Tradition (American constitution) → Splitting the atom of sovereignty
○ A middle ground between national & international law
- You can have 2 sovereigns in the same territory at the same time
- Citizens can be subject to both sovereigns


● The European Tradition
○ Sovereignty cannot be split → Indivisible sovereignty
- Federation is either a federal state or a creature of international law not
being a state


Critique based on Democratic Constitutionalism
● In Federalism
○ Peoples, sovereigns & constitutions may co-exist in the same territory


● Democratic constitutionalism → No European Demos
○ No European constitutions → No federal source of authority
- Only one people → Only one sovereignty & one constitution


How do we get out of this deadlock?
● Solution: EU is sui generis?
○ Not international law or national law → One of a kind
- Does not help us understand what it is


Dual vs Cooperative Federalism
1) Dual federations
- Strict separation of legislative & executive power (Vertical & horizontal)
- Emphasis not on “shared rule”
- Ex: Belgium, US


2) Cooperative federations
- Separation of powers less strict
- States are actors in the centre of power (states part of power at centre)
- Legislative, executive & judicial functions are “shared”
- Ex: Germany, EU → MS’s part of EU legislature

,Cooperative federalism in the EU
● Shared institutions
○ National & EU functions → Heads of state
● Shared democracy
○ ART 10 TEU
● Shared judiciary
○ All courts in the EU → Have an MS court & EU court
- Ensure the rule of EU law is guaranteed → PRP


The EU “Constitution” & the Rule of Law
● Rule of Law → Access to independent courts
○ Rule of law is an essential value → Because the EU started as a peace project
1) EU institutions must comply with the rule of law
- ART 2
2) Member States must also comply with the rule of law
- ART 49 TEU → Condition for accession


● Only one Court responsible for interpreting the validity of EU law → CJEU
○ Les Verts → “EEC is a community based on the rule of law”
- Whether or not you could start a case against the EP
- The rule of law is “supra-constitutional” → EP had to adhere as well
- Went above the importance of the Treaty


● Rule of law in legal theory
○ Minimalist (Formalist) view
- Does the RoL demand public power to be legally circumscribed, predictable
& excercised through clear procedural requirements & reviewable by courts?
- Rule by law Ex: Rosa Parks is wrong → Rule of bad law


○ Normative view
- Does the RoL also demand public power to conform to substantive
standards of democracy and human rights?
- There should be limitations

, What does the EU follow? Formal vs Substantive Rule of Law
● Black Letter Lawyer → Minimalist view
○ ART 2 Rule of law is next to fundamental rights & democracy


The Rule of Law Crisis in the EU & The Instruments to Address the Rule of Law
● The Rule of Law in the EU Member States → Crisis
○ EU developed tools to make sure the Rule of law is applied
1) ART 49 TEU → Accession
- Only states complying can accede to Rule of law
- Copenhagen Criteria
2) ART 7 TEU → Treaty of Amsterdam
- MS’s rights can be frozen/Suspended
- Ex: Voting rights
- Triggered for the first time by Poland & Hungary (not completed)
- Veto in favour of each other → Architectural flaw of ART 7
3) ART 47 Charter
- Right to independent court
- Limitation: Applies to the MS only when they apply EU law
4) ART 19(1)TEU (new)
- MS shall provide remedies to ensure sufficient legal protection in the
fields covered by EU law
5) Structured Dialogue


6) Power of the purse
- Financial
- Hit the MS where it hurts most → Money!!!


The “Power of the Purse”
● Conditionality Regulation → Links the access to EU funds to complying with the rule of law
○ Your judiciary must be independent
○ European Strcutural Investment Funds (ESIF)
○ Powerful tool to enforce the rule of law → Regulation is controversial
- Poland, Hungary against it
- Abusing the power of the purse?
- Can you buy the rule of law?
● Has limitations
○ Need to make a connection between the rule of law & the sound functioning of the
budget

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller smahd. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $16.62. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67474 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$16.62
  • (0)
  Add to cart