100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Samenvatting - Advanced Research Methods (GW4588M) $6.47   Add to cart

Summary

Samenvatting - Advanced Research Methods (GW4588M)

 23 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Summary of the courses and material required for the exam

Preview 2 out of 8  pages

  • January 22, 2024
  • 8
  • 2023/2024
  • Summary
avatar-seller
ADVANCED RESEARCH METHODS 23/24 – M HEALTH ECONOMICS,
POLICY AND LAW


WEEK 1 - CAUSALITY AND DIRECTED ACYCLIC GRAPHS
CAUSAL INFERENCES

Causal inference we consider the assumptions, study designs and estimation strategies that allow to draw
causal conclusions based on data. In causal inference we are not interested in the outcome per se but are
interested in the influence that a factor has in achieving an outcome.

Causal effect is described by Hernàn and Robins as: “In an individual, a treatment has a causal effect if the
outcome under treatment 1 would be different from the outcome under treatment 2”. To asses this,
information is needed on: What would have happened? And: What will happen?

The formal notation of a causal effect is: - Y = outcome
- a = treatment
- 1 = yes (received treatment)
- 0 = no (received no treatment)
- i = individual
- ≠ does not equal

Counterfactual outcome: the potential outcome is not observed, because the subject did not experience the
treatment (controls)




IDENTIFIABILITY CONDITIONS

Average causal effect can be determined if, and only if, three identifiability conditions are met in a study:

1. Positivity
- Each individual has to have a ‘positive probability’ of being assigned to each of the treatment
arms (i.e., Pr(A=a)>0 for all treatment arms)
2. Consistency
- The treatment (or intervention, exposure) has to be well-defined
3. Exchangeability
- The individuals assigned to the different treatment arms have to be similar
- It does not matter who gets treatment A and who gets treatment B
a
- Formal notation Y i ⊥ A , meaning that the potential outcomes are independent of the treatment
that was actually received

If all conditions are met (and a association is found in the data) the association between exposure and outcome
is an unbiased estimate of a causal effect

, MEETING THE EXCHANGEABILITY CONDITIONS

Various ways are possible

1. Randomized controlled trial (RCT) – Golden standard, because typically all identifiability conditions are
met in RCT
- Individuals are randomly assigned to one of each treatment arms
- Differences between individuals in the different treatment arms are cancelled out on the sample
level
- Differences are independent from the treatment and outcome
- Differences are random, not systematic
2. Matching
- For each individual with characteristics x, y, and z who gets treatment A, there is an individual
with characteristics x, y, and z who gets treatment B
- Statistical methods can be applied when perfect matching (i.e., use identical twins, triplets, …) is
not possible (e.g., propensity score matching
3. Stratification
- Randomly select individuals from different subsets (i.e. strata) of the larger population
- Difficult to meet the positivity condition (i.e. individuals in all strata)




- Stratification quicly becomes infeasible, the more strata are added
4. Adjustment
- Control for factors that influence (i.e. bias) the association between the treatment and outcome
in regression analysis
- Individuals are assigned to all treatment arms within all levels of adjustment factors
- Can also be combined with an RCT, stratification, and matching
- Complete and correct adjustment leads to exchangeability (use of the tool DAG)

STUDY TYPES, RCT VS OBSERVATIONAL

RCTs considered ‘golden standard’ however:

- Limited external validity (e.g., controlled setting, efficacy of treatment)
- Ethical and practical considerations

Observational (non-randomised) studies:

- Real-world outcomes (effectiveness of treatment)
- Availability of data (e.g., patient registries)
- Positivity and consistency need close attention
- Internal validity threatened by lack of exchangeability

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller anthony16. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $6.47. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

66579 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$6.47
  • (0)
  Add to cart