Class notes

BPP Tort Law GDL Revision and Chapter Notes

0 purchase

Course
BPP Tort Law GDL Revision and Chapter Notes

Institution
BPP Tort Law GDL Revision And Chapter Notes

BPP Tort Law GDL Revision and Chapter Notes, BPP Tort Law GDL Revision and Chapter Notes, BPP Tort Law GDL Revision and Chapter Notes, BPP Tort Law GDL Revision and Chapter Notes, BPP Tort Law GDL Revision and Chapter Notes, BPP Tort Law GDL Revision and Chapter Notes, BPP Tort La...

[Show more]

Preview 4 out of 83 pages

View example

Uploaded on January 31, 2024
Number of pages 83
Written in 2023/2024
Type Class notes
Professor(s) Bpp
Contains All classes

bpp tort law gdl
bpp tort law gd
bpp tort law gdl revision and chapter notes
bpp tort law gdl revision and chapter notes
tort law gdl revision and chapter notes
tort law gdl revision chapter notes

Institution
BPP Tort Law GDL Revision and Chapter Notes
Education
BPP Tort Law GDL Revision and Chapter Notes
Course
BPP Tort Law GDL Revision and Chapter Notes

alkersltzer

Member since 1 year 18 documents sold

$13.49

Add to cart

Add to wishlist

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

BPP Tort Law GDL Revision and
Chapter Notes

WRITTEN BY BRIAN KARIUKI

Buy and sell all your revision notes, study guides, essays and lecture notes, and many more
From me.

Tort Revision Ch 2: Trespass to the Person

Trespass to the personis the intentional cause of
injury, as opposed to the negligent cause of
injury. An employer can be vicariously liable for an
employee who commits trespass.

1) Assault
2) Battery
3) The Rule in Wilkinson v Downton
4) False Imprisonment
Actionable per se: without proof of damage and require
an act, not an omission

Battery
“the direct and intentional application of force by D to C
without lawful justification”.

1) Intentional
a) Letang v Cooper: Negligence is not enough to
show intentionality
b) Fowler v Lanning: C was shot by D. There
would have been no trespass if the shooting was
caused unintentionally.
c) Innes v Wylle: Must be an act, not an omission.
d) Livingstone v MOD: Transferred malice still applies

,2) Direct
a) Reynolds v Clarke: Includes if someone throws
something on a road in someone’s path.
b) Fagan v CMP: Did not remove car from policeman’s
foot. This was an act, not an omission.
c) Dodwell v Burford: D struck a horse that C was
sitting on = direct.
d) DPP v K: boy hid acid in hand-dryer = direct.
3) Application of Force
a) Any physical contact
i) Cole v Turner: “the least touch of another
in anger is a battery” ii) R v Cotesworth :
spitting iii) Nash v Sheen: applying hair dye
4) Hostility
a) Wilson v Pringle: “it must be a question of
fact”
5) Defences
a) Consent
i) Express = consent to broad nature and terms
of medical procedure
(Chatterton v Gerson) ii)
Implied = gettingon a tube
at rush hour (Re F)
iii) R v Tabassum: patient consented to medical exam
but D was not medically qualified. Consent
invalid.
iv) R v Brown: consent invalid for ABH
b) Necessity (Re A (Conjoined Twins))
i) the act is needed to avoid inevitable and
irreparable evil ii) no more should be done than
reasonably necessary iii) the evil inflicted must not
be disproportionate to the evil avoided
c) Self-Defence
i) Defence of personand property
ii) Cockroft v Smith: bit off finger to avoid being
poked in the eye iii) Bird v Holbrook: spring
gun not acceptable to protect property iv) Lane
v Holloway: what is reasonable depends on
the facts
d) Statutory Authority
i) Lawful arrest and detention
e) Reasonable Chastisement
i) Consider nature, context, duration, mentaland
physical consequences, age and personal
characteristics of the child, reasons for
punishment.
f) Contributory Negligence is N/A (Co-Op v Pritchard)
g) Inevitable Accident

, Stuvia.co.uk - The Marketplace for Revision Notes & Study Guides

Assault
“an act that produces in C a reasonable expectation of
immediate, unlawful force”
– R v Beasley

1) Intentional Act
a) Can be words without gestures (R v Wilson: “get
out the knives”)
b) Silence can be assault(R v Ireland)
c) Words can negate gestures (Tuberville v Savage:
hand on sword + “if it were not assize time I
would not take such language”).
2) Apprehension of Immediate Battery
a) A threat to future harm may not be enough (Thomas
v NUM: minerswho were striking threatened to
hurt him, but he was in a protected vehicle).

b) Effect on a reasonable person, not subjective
apprehension (R v St George)
c) ‘Immediate’ can be any time in the near future (R v
Ireland: silent phone calls).
3) Defences – Same as Battery

The Rule in Wilkinson v Downton
Essentially practical jokes that cause harm.

In Wilkinson v Downton D told C that her husband
had been badly injured in an accident. C suffered
nervous shock and D was held liable.

1) Deliberate acts or words
2) Calculated to cause harm to the claimant
3) Unlawfully

False Imprisonment
“an act of D that directly and intentionally causes the
complete restriction of C’s liberty without lawful
justification”

1) Intentional Act
a) Accidently locking someone in is not false imprisonment
(Sayer v Harlow)

, 2) Imprisonment
a) C’s liberty must be restricted in all directions
(Bird v Jones: was not allowed to walk
across a bridge = not false imprisonment)
b) They are only expected to take reasonable means to
gain their freedom
c) C does not need to be aware that he is
being imprisoned (Meering v Grahame-White
Aviation: employee was locked in office b/c
suspected of theft. Asked to wait there).
d) No need for actual force (Davidson v CCNW: “stay
here or I’ll kill you”)
3) False
a) Without lawful justification
i) Lawful includes contractual obligations (Robinson v
Balmain New Ferry: refused to pay a
penny to get through a turnstile; Herd v
Weardale Steel: miner refused to continue his
shift and demanded to be brought to
surface = no false imprisonment).
b) Wrongful continuation of lawful imprisonment can be
false imprisonment (Toumia v Evans: locked in
cell for longer than usual b/c of prison officers’
dispute).
4) Defences – Same as Battery

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller alkersltzer. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $13.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

69052 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 15 years now

Start selling

Class notes

BPP Tort Law GDL Revision and Chapter Notes

Document information

Subjects

Written for

Seller

Reviews received

Content preview