100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Samenvatting - Teamwork - Theories, Design and Dynamics $7.83   Add to cart

Summary

Samenvatting - Teamwork - Theories, Design and Dynamics

 35 views  3 purchases
  • Course
  • Institution

Dit is een samenvatting van het vak Teamwork - Theories, Design and Dynamics waarin de hoorcolleges, eventuele artikelen en de uitgebreide samenvatting van het vak wordt samengevat. Hierdoor staat alle nuttige informatie in 1 document en blijft het overzichtelijk.

Preview 3 out of 17  pages

  • February 13, 2024
  • 17
  • 2023/2024
  • Summary
avatar-seller
Teamwork - Theories, Design and Dynamics
Hoorcollege 1
Work teams: interdependent collection of individuals who share responsibility for specific outcomes
for their organization.

Why are team so popular:
“Teams offer the potential for synergy, that wonderful state when a group ‘clicks’ and members
achieve something together that no one of them could possibly have accomplished alone”

 Teams bring more resources
 Diversity in background and expertise
 Flexibility, keep the work going

What are work teams?

- Interdependence as a defining feature
- dictionary definition: ‘the dependence of two or more people or things on each other’
- interdependence is everywhere




Low:

- Individual tasks are pooled at the end as group output
- Individual contributions are valued (rewarded) more than collective contributions
- Redundant individual resources/ expertise etc.

High:

- Individuals work simultaneously on all aspects of the task
- Rewards are based on the collective output/ end product
- Members differ in their type and quantity of resources

Two different types of work teams:

1. Task interdependence: the degree to which members depend on another for access to critical
resources and create workflows that require coordinated action
2. Outcome interdependence: the degree to which goals are formulated and outcomes are
rewarded in terms of collective rather than individual contributions

TEAM: together everyone achieves more

Are work teams really that effective?

 Richard hackman: ‘research evidence about team performance shows that teams usually do
less well – not better- than the sum of their members’ individual contributions

,  In a lab study of 33 teams: ‘probably 4 of our 33 groups were actually effective teams. The
rest had problems so severe that our analysis was mainly about what had gone wrong with
them’
 Several features are needed for teams to be successful

What do work teams need to be effective?

- TASK
do not us a team for work that is better one by individuals
- STUCTURE
to recap the benefits of teamwork, one must actually build the team
set boundaries, define relationships, divide tasks, form relationships with stakeholders
- LEADERSHIP AND SUPPORT
leaders need to give direction to avoid ambiguity
the organizational context needs to provides support that is specifically tuned to the needs of
work teams
it is important to reward collective outcomes

The model
Star players -> coordination -> performance

The basic IMOI model
Input -> mediator -> output

1. Input

 Team design
- composition
- interdependence
- leaderschip and authority
 Task factors
 Context

Potential performance: performance that a team could achieve
- is high when teams have the resources that are required by the task

Task types and potential performance




Actual performance (Steiner, 1972)
= potential performance – process loss
- coordination loss
- motivation loss

, 2. Mediators

 Team processes: members interdependent acts that convert inputs to outcomes through
cognitive, verbal, and behavioral activities directed toward organizing taskwork to achieve
collective goals
 Emergent states: constructs that characterize properties of the team that are typically
dynamic in nature and vary as a function of team context, inputs, processes, and outcomes

Cohesion (emergent state)

 The force that binds members to the team and induces them to stay in with the team
- task cohesion: shared commitment to the team task
- interpersonal cohesion: attraction to the team
 Meta-analytic correlation with performance
- task: .27
- interpersonal: .14
 Causality?

Mullen & Copper, 1994




The IMOI model



3. Output

 Nijstad, 2009




Bunderson & Sutcliffe, 2002

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller emmavoortman. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $7.83. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

84866 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$7.83  3x  sold
  • (0)
  Add to cart