Summary
Summary Trusts of Family Home (Constructive Trusts) Problem Question Structure
- Course
- Institution
Detailed structure on how to answer a problem question under the topic "Trusts of Family Home" or constructive trusts.
[Show more]
1 review
By: olachiordor • 8 months ago
Seller
Follow
Zawar
Reviews received
Content preview
TRUSTS OF THE FAMILY HOME - STRUCTURE(1) Establishing an Interest
Express trust would clearly outline who held the legal ttle to the property, and who held
benefcial interests in the home, and in what shares s.53 (1) (b) LPA 1925
If not express, then it would have to be an implied trust s.53 (2) LPA 1925
o Resultng Trust OR Constructve Trust
(2) How is the Legal Title Held?
Equity follows the law
Joint ownership or sole owner?
If joint ownership, a 50/50 split is presumed from the start so both partes have a benefcial
interest – so no need to establish a trust.
If sole legal owner then the other party will have to establish whether a beneficial interest
exists in favour of them, either through a RT or CT.
(3) Resultng Trust (RT)
A Presumed Resultng Trust (PRT) will arise where the other party paid part of the deposit or
is liable for the mortgage repayments (Cowcher v Cowcher)
Curley v Parkes: Contributon to the purchase price prior or at the tme would allocate a
beneficial interest
Jones v Kernot: resultng trusts are not suitable in allocatng benefcial interests in family
home.
Quantfying the Share under RT:
o Laskar v Laskar: The share is in direct proporton to the contributon
o ‘Bank balance’ approach to allocatng shares in the home
10% contributon = 10% interest in the property.
(4) Constructve Trust (CT)
Lloyds Bank v Rosset: Lord Bridge stated there are two ways to establish a constructve trust.
First Method: Express Common Intenton CT
(1) Intenton must be express
o Springete v eFoe: Cannot be an intent in the mind & then never communicated
(2) Intenton must be common
o Springete v efoe: Must be a bilateral spoken agreement. Has to be spoken.
(3) Detrimental Reliance
o Once express common intenton is established, the claimant must prove he/she
relied on that agreement to his/her detriment.
o Eves v Eves & Grant v Edwards: acton that the other would not have done ‘but for’
believing he/she had an interest in the home.
o Reliance can be financial reliance or non-financial reliance (any actvity that is
detrimental)
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Zawar. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $8.38. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
72042 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now