100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
LML4806 Exam pack 2024(Question and answers) $2.50   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

LML4806 Exam pack 2024(Question and answers)

 18 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

LML4806 Exam pack 2024(Question and answers) With accurate answers and assurance that they are in the exam.

Preview 3 out of 23  pages

  • March 4, 2024
  • 23
  • 2023/2024
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
avatar-seller
NAME: TASKEEN

SURNAME: KADER

STUDENT NUMBER: 67396844

LML4806-COMPANY LAW

OCTOBER\NOVEMBER EXAMINATIONS 2021




1

,QUESTION ONE

1.1.
Issue
The issue of the case is to determine whether the ordinary resolutions were
validly passed at the meeting seeing as though Oliver(a director and
shareholder) was not present at the meeting and there was no notice given for
the meeting.


Relevant law
In terms of section 64 of the Companies Act 71 of 2008 (‘the Act’), a
shareholders’ meeting may not begin until sufficient persons are present at
the meeting to exercise in aggregate at least 25% of all the voting rights that
are entitled to be exercised in respect of at least one matter to be decided at
the meeting. This is subject to the Memorandum of Incorporation of the
company which may specify a higher or a lower percentage instead of the
25% requirement.


In companies with more than two shareholders, at least three shareholders
are required to be present and the 25% requirement (or a different
requirement if stated in the Memorandum of Incorporation) must also be
satisfied.


Section 64(4) of the Act provides that if, within an hour after the scheduled
time for the meeting to commence, the quorum is not met, the meeting may
be postponed without motion, vote or further notice for one week.


In terms of s71(2), the notice of a shareholders’ meeting to remove a director,
and the resolution, must be given to the director prior to considering the
resolution to remove the director. The period of notice that should be given is
equivalent to that which a shareholder is entitled to receive when convening a
meeting. The director must be allowed the reasonable opportunity to make a
presentation, in person or through a representative, to the meeting, before the
resolution is put to a vote.


2

, However, if every shareholder of a company (other than a state-owned
company) is also a director of the company, any matter that is required to be
referred by the board to the shareholders for decision may be dealt with in
terms of section 57(4) of the Companies Act 71 of 2008. The effect of this
section is that a matter may be referred by the board to the shareholders
without notice or compliance with any internal formalities. This is subject to
the Memorandum of Incorporation which may provide otherwise.




Therefore, since all the shareholders of Exclusive Properties (Pty) Ltd are
directors of the company, section 57(4) of the Companies Act 71 of 2008
would be applicable, unless the Memorandum of Incorporation provides
otherwise.


Section 57(4) requires the following:
• Every person must be present at the board meeting when the matter
was referred to them in their capacity as shareholders.
• A sufficient number of persons must be present in their capacity as
shareholders to satisfy the quorum requirements as set out in section
64 of the Companies Act.
• A resolution adopted by the shareholders be supported by
shareholders holding at least the percentage of shares required for
adopting an ordinary resolution at a properly constituted shareholders’
meeting.




Application
In this case, Oliver was not present at the meeting. Therefore, the first
provision is not satisfied because not every person was present at the board
meeting when the matter was referred to them in their capacity as
shareholders. The default position for a quorum to be satisfied is that at least
25% of all the voting rights that are entitled to be exercised in respect of at
least one matter to be decided at the meeting must be present before the


3

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller gabrielmusyoka940. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $2.50. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

82871 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$2.50
  • (0)
  Add to cart