Should the law be doing more to protect drunk women? (R v Bree 2007)
All for this textbook (20)
Written for
City University (City)
LLB Law
Criminal law
All documents for this subject (41)
Seller
Follow
remycorrina
Reviews received
Content preview
Lecture 7
D satsses both the actus reus and mens rea of murderb but has a partal defence which reduces
l iabil ity from murder to mansl aughter.
Partal defences
Loss of Control (previousl y provocatonn
Diminished Responsibil ity
Suicide Pact
Provocaton
Two tests as to whether the person wil l get the defence. Subjectve test- had the def l ost control
because he had been provoked. Objectve test- woul d a reasonabl e person have acted the same.
Duffy [194f9] 1 Al l ER 932: PProvocaton is some act or series of acts done or words spoken by the
dead man to the accused which woul d cause in any reasonabl e person and actual l y does cause in the
accusedb a sudden and temporary l oss of sel f-control b rendering the accused so subject to passion as
to make him or her for the moment not master of his mind.” per Devl in J
Probl ems with provocaton
What types of conduct can qual ify as provocatonn Doughty (1986n 83 Cr App R 319- the incessant
crying of a baby was accepted as justscaton for l oss of control .
What characteristcs of D can be taken into account when deciding if her reacton shoul d qual ify for
the defencen Smith (Morgann [2001] AC 14f6; AG for Jersey v Hol l ey [2005] UKPC 23
Is the defence gender biased in its operatonn Women tend to be sl ow burners which is not
necessaril y revenge. Ahl uwal ia [1992] 4f Al l ER 889- batered wife syndrome kil l ed husband.
Is the defence designed as a partal justscaton (D acted wrongl yb but as others woul d haven or as a
partal excuse (D’s weakness makes her acton l ess bl ameworthynn lmohammedl
Law commissions reforms- l oss of control
Loss of control
Deff: D kil l s whil e out of control owing to fear of serious viol ence or a justsabl e sense of being
seriousl y wronged (Coroners and Justce Act 2009b s54fn
1. D’s acts and omission in doing or being part to the kil l ingb resul ted from D’s l oss of sel f
control . (s.54f (1n(an
The defence does not appl y if ‘in doing or being a party to the kil l ingb D acted in a considered desire
for revenge (s.54f(4fn.
It does not mater whether or not the l oss of control was sudden. (s.54f(2n Can be a sl ow burner
Ahl uwal ia
D must have actual l y l ost control . Jewel l [2014f] EWCA Crim 4f14f
2. the l oss of sel f-control had a qual ifying trigger
can be: a fear of serious viol ence from V against D or another (s.55(3nb
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller remycorrina. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $4.56. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.