DR – WS1 Pre Action Steps TIFF LIAO
Chapter 12.3.1 Duty of an Expert Page 232
12.3.1 THE DUTY
OF AN EXPERT
- r 35.3 makes it clear that the duty of an expert is to help the court on the matters within their expertise, and this duty OVERRIEDS
any obligation to the person from whom they have received instructions or by whom they are paid.
- If the expert is unsure of the nature of these obligations = may file a request for directions from the court.
- Experts should, therefore, be completely objective and unbiased in the way in which they provide their opinion for the benefit of
the court
- Likewise, it is NOT for an expert to comment on issues concerning the credibility of a party or the reliability of a party’s evidence
- Payment of the expert’s fee on a conditional or contingency fee basis might call into question the independence and impartiality
of the expert.
In Gardiner and Theobald LLP v Jackson (Valuation Officer) [2018] UKUT 253 (LC), a case concerning rating valuations, the expert
was NOT paid on a conditional fee basis but their firm was entitled to a ‘success-related fee’ if the firm secured a reduction in
liability for rates on the properties. This gave rise to concerns about independence, as in the judge’s view it gave the expert a
‘direct financial interest’ in the assessment of rateable value.
- An expert is NOT disqualified by the fact of being employed by one of the parties
the court will need to be satisfied that the expert was sufficiently aware of their responsibilities to the court (Field v Leeds
City Council [2000] 1 EGLR 54).
Given the risk of the appearance of bias, parties will generally prefer to instruct an expert who is independent. See also
Proton Energy Group SA v Orlen Lietuva [2013] EWHC 2872 (Comm).
- An expert who behaves improperly is likely to be reported to their governing body by the trial judge at the end of the hearing, as
suggested in Pearce v Ove Arup Partnership [2001] LTL, 8 November and Meadow v General Medical Council [2006] EWCA Civ
1390.
- If an expert’s behaviour demonstrates a flagrant or reckless disregard of their duty to the court and thereby wastes the costs of
the opposing party, the expert may be ordered to contribute towards payment of those costs (see Robinson v Liverpool
University Hospitals NHS Trust [2023] EWHC 21 (KB)).
- An expert who deliberately or recklessly makes a false statement in their report is likely receive a custodial sentence for being in
contempt of court (Liverpool Victoria Insurance Company Ltd v Zafar [2019] EWCA Civ 39).
- Note also that a party may sue their own expert in negligence: see Jones v Kaney [2011] UKSC 13.
1
TIFF LIAO
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller tiffany_liao. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $9.28. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.