100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
Previously searched by you
Summary The Short- and Longterm Impact of Brand Placement in an Advertiser-Funded TV Program on Viewers’ Attitudes Towards the Sponsor brand and Its Main Competitor (Verhellen, Eelen, Dens, de Pelsmacker)$3.19
Summary The Short- and Longterm Impact of Brand Placement in an Advertiser-Funded TV Program on Viewers’ Attitudes Towards the Sponsor brand and Its Main Competitor (Verhellen, Eelen, Dens, de Pelsmacker)
This is a summary of the article "The Short- and Longterm Impact of Brand Placement in an Advertiser-Funded TV Program on Viewers’ Attitudes Towards the Sponsor brand and Its Main Competitor"
the short and longterm impact of brand placement in an advertiser funded tv program on viewers’ attitudes towards the sponsor brand and its main competitor
Written for
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (VU)
Msc. Marketing
Consumer Marketing
All documents for this subject (18)
1
review
By: vivilulei • 5 year ago
Seller
Follow
Rickdelaat
Reviews received
Content preview
The short- and long-term impact of brand placement in an ad-funded TV
program on viewers’ attudes toward the sponsor brand and its compettor
Verhellen, Eelen, Dens & de Pelsmacker
Integratng brands in TV media content causes a transformatonal process in which content-related
feelings and thoughts spill over to the placed brands. Ultmately, the mechanism of afect transfer is
nested in the workings of the human associatve memory. The context (television program) in which
a brand is encountered makes up part of that brand’s associatve network. Therefore, a brand’s
associatve network should contain more positve associatons by being placed in a program which
induces positve afect.
Hypothesis 1: program liking of an ad-funded TV program (AFP) has a positve efect on viewers’
attitude toward the sponsor brand.
Program-sponsor brand ft: the degree of congruence between the program and the sponsor brand.
Placements that are more fitting with the program generate more positve brand attitudes because
they are less likely to interrupt the viewing experience.
Attitude obcects that fit well are strongly connected through shared associatons in their associatve
networks. The more associatve links exist between two attitude obcects, the easier it becomes to
transfer afect from one attitude obcect to another.
Hypothesis 2: the positve efect of program liking on viewers’ attitude toward the sponsor brand is
moderated by program-sponsor brand fit, so that the efect is more positve with higher levels of
perceived fit.
People can forget learned associatons when they are no longer actvated, so the associatons
between a program and a brand will fade over tme, reducing the potental for afect transfer.
Hypothesis 3: the positve efect of program liking on viewers’ attitude toward the sponsor brand
weakens over tme.
A high degree of perceived fit benefits both the number and strength of associatons between the
brand and the program. As the AFP and the brand are more directly related, it is more likely that
afect transfer will stll occur as tme goes by. In contrast, when there is low perceived program-
sponsor brand fit, the brand is weakly associated with the program and these weak associatons are
much more likely to erode over tme.
Hypothesis 4: the positve efect of program liking on viewers’ attitude toward the sponsor brand
weakens over tme, but slower with increasing program-sponsor brand fit.
The sponsor brand not only shares associatons with the AFP, but also shares associatons with its
compettors. Brands in the same product category share associatons that are related to that product
category. Brands with a similar positoning within that product category will share even more
associatons. The spreading actvaton of an AFP may result in the retrieval of a number of brands
within the product category. Thus, while it is mainly the sponsor brand that benefits from afect
transfer at encoding, the program may be linked to another brand at a later stage.
Hypothesis 5: the positve efect of program liking on viewers’ attitude toward a competng brand
increases over tme.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Rickdelaat. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $3.19. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
