100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary Consumer Adoption of New Products: Independent Versus Interdependent Self-Perspectives (Ma, Yang, Mourali) $3.21   Add to cart

Summary

Summary Consumer Adoption of New Products: Independent Versus Interdependent Self-Perspectives (Ma, Yang, Mourali)

1 review
 127 views  1 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

This is a summary of the article "Consumer Adoption of New Products: Independent Versus Interdependent Self-Perspectives"

Last document update: 6 year ago

Preview 2 out of 4  pages

  • November 14, 2018
  • November 17, 2018
  • 4
  • 2018/2019
  • Summary

1  review

review-writer-avatar

By: mslee4444 • 4 year ago

avatar-seller
Consumer Adopton oo New Products: Independent vs. Interdependent
Ma, Yang & Mourali

Theoretcal Background
Selo-construal: the perspectie that people haie about their thoughts and actons in relaton to
others.

There are two perspecties about the self (self-construal):
 Independent self: iiew the self as autonomous and separate from others (self-others
differentaton).
 Interdependent self: iiew the self as connected with others (self-others assimilaton).

The distnctieness of independents (is. interdependents) should make them more willing to adopt
new products. The effect of self-construal on new product adopton might be dependent on the
newness of the product. Independents are more likely to adopt really new products (RNPs) and
interdependents are more likely to adopt incrementally new products (INPs). These effects might be
driien by the perceiied ft between the product’s newness leiel and the optmal leiel of
distnctieness that the independent and interdependent selies want. Independents deriie a higher
distnctieness utlity from RNPs and interdependents deriie a higher distnctieness utlity from
INPs.

Distnctveness utlity: the product’s perceiied ability to proiide a desired sense of distnctieness.

Hypothesis 1: the effect of self-construal on consumer new product adopton is dependent on the
newness of the product. Independents are more willing to adopt RNPs and interdependents are
more willing to adopt INPs.

Hypothesis 2a: independents and interdependents diierge in the distnctieness utlity they deriie
from INPs and RNPs. Independents perceiie more distnctieness utlity in RNPs and interdependents
perceiie more distnctieness utlity in INPs.

Hypothesis 2b: perceiied distnctieness utlity mediates the joint effect of self-construal and
newness on innoiaton adopton.

Socially contextual cues that increase or decrease the perceiied distnctieness utlity of the products
can reierse self-related preferences for INPs and RNPs:
 Distnctieness-dampening cues: popularity cues make an RNP a normatie instead of a
differentatng choice which makes an RNP less congruent with independents’ desired
distnctieness and more with those of interdependents. This will not affect INPs
 Distnctieness-enhancing cues: scarcity cues make an INP more exclusiie which makes an
INP more congruent with the distnctieness needs of independents and less with those of
interdependents. This will not affect RNPs.

Hypothesis 3a: popularity cues make independents less willing to adopt RNPs.
Hypothesis 3b: popularity cues make interdependents more willing to adopt RNPs.
Hypothesis 3c: popularity cues do not affect independents’ or inter dependents’ adopton tendency
toward INPs.

Hypothesis 4a: scarcity cues make independents more willing to adopt INPs.
Hypothesis 4b: scarcity cues make interdependent less willing to adopt INPs.

, Hypothesis 4c: scarcity cues do not affect the independents or interdependents adopton tendency
toward RNPs.

Study 1
Method
Partcipants read ierbal descriptons of six pairs of INPs and RNPs that fall into six product categories.
Partcipants indicated (yesnno) whether they had bought each product for their own use. For the
products that they bought, they indicated the specifc year of purchase. We measured self-construal
using the Self-Construal Scale.

Results
 Consumers were more likely to adopt INPs than RNPs
 Independents are more willing to adopt RNPs and interdependents are more willing to adopt
INPs

Study 2
Method
Partcipants frst imagined a scenario about a tennis tournament (competng either as an indiiidual
or as a team) that primed different self-perspecties. Next, they assumed that they were in the
market for a new iehicle and came across a news report about a new car, described as either an INP
or an RNP. They then completed measures of purchase intenton, product knowledge, regulatory
focus, and demographics.

Results
 Independents had a higher purchase intenton for RNPs
 Interdependents had a higher purchase intenton for INPs.

Study 3
Method
Each partcipant receiied an enielope containing one pen and one print ad for a pen. We instructed
them to examine the material and proiide their impressions of the pen and the print ad. They then
completed measures of perceiied newness, attude toward the ad, attude toward the pen,
distnctieness utlity, perceiied risk, need for uniquueness, demographics, and one behaiioural
measure of product adopton.

Results
 Independents had a higher purchase intenton for RNPs
 Interdependents had a higher purchase
intenton for INPs
 For RNPs, independents reported higher
distnctie-utlity
 For INPs, interdependents reported higher
distnctie-utlity
 For existng products, the two selies did not
differ in distnctie-utlity
 Distnctieness utlity mediates the joint effect of
self-construal and newness on innoiaton adopton
 Partcipants perceiied the RNP pen as riskier than the INP and existng pen, but perceiied
risk had no signifcant effect on adopton behaiiour.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Rickdelaat. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $3.21. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67474 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$3.21  1x  sold
  • (1)
  Add to cart