100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Begrippenlijst boek cognitieve psychologie $7.76   Add to cart

Other

Begrippenlijst boek cognitieve psychologie

 6 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Complete begrippenlijst voor het tentamen van cognitieve psychologie voor jaar 1 psychologie Universiteit Leiden

Preview 2 out of 6  pages

  • March 21, 2024
  • 6
  • 2022/2023
  • Other
  • Unknown
avatar-seller
Hoofdstuk 1:
- Claim: When a belief (judgment, opinion) is asserted in a declarative sentence, the result is
a claim, statement, or assertion.
- Objective claim vs. subjective claim: An objective claim is true or false regardless of
whether people think it is true or false. Claims that lack this property are said to be
subjective.
- “Fact vs. opinion”: People sometimes refer to true objective claims as “facts,” and use the
word “opinion” to designate any claim that is subjective.
- “Factual claim”: An objective claim. Saying that a claim is “factual” is not the same as
saying it is true. A factual claim is simply a claim whose truth does not depend on our
thinking it is true.
- Moral subjectivism: Moral subjectivism is the idea that moral judgments are subjective.
“There is nothing either good or bad but that thinking makes it so.”
- Issue: A question.
- “Argument”: People sometimes use this word to refer just to an argument’s premise.
- Arguments and issues: The conclusion of an argument states a position on the issue under
consideration.
- Cognitive bias: A feature of human psychology that skews belief formation. The ones
discussed in this chapter include the following:
- Belief bias: Evaluating reasoning by how believable its conclusion is.
- Confirmation bias: A tendency to attach more weight to considerations that support
our views.
- Availability heuristic: Assigning a probability to an event based on how easily or
frequently it is thought of.
- False consensus effect: Assuming our opinions and those held by people around us
are shared by society at large.
- Bandwagon effect: The tendency to align our beliefs with those of other people.
- Negativity bias: Attaching more weight to negative information than to positive
information.
- Loss aversion: Being more strongly motivated to avoid a loss than to accrue a gain.
- In-group bias: A set of cognitive biases that make us view people who belong to our
group differently from people who don’t.
- Fundamental attribution error: Having one understanding of the behavior of people
in the in-group and another for people not in the in-group.
- Obedience to authority: A tendency to comply with instructions from an authority.
- Overconfidence effect: A cognitive bias that leads us to overestimate what
percentage of our answers on a subject are correct.
- Better-than-average illusion: A self-deception cognitive bias that leads us to
overestimate our own abilities relative to those of others.
- Truth: A claim is true if it is free from error.
- Knowledge: If you believe something, have an argument beyond a reasonable doubt that it
is so, and have no reason to think you are mistaken, you can claim you know it.

Hoofdstuk 2:

, - Arguments always have two parts, a premise (or premises) and a conclusion.
- The same statement can be a premise in one argument and a conclusion in a second
argument.
- The two fundamental types of reasoning are deductive demonstration and inductive
support.
- A deductive argument is used to demonstrate or prove a conclusion, which it does if it is
sound.
- An argument is sound if it is valid and its premise (or premises) is true.
- An argument is valid if it isn’t possible for its premise or premises to be true and its
conclusion to be false.
- An inductive argument is used to support rather than to demonstrate a conclusion.
- An argument supports a conclusion if it increases the likelihood that the conclusion is true.
- Support is a matter of degrees: An argument supports a conclusion to the extent its premise
(or premises) makes the conclusion likely.
- An argument that offers more support for a conclusion is said to be stronger than one that
offers less support; the latter is said to be weaker than the former.
- Some instructors use the word “strong” in an absolute sense to denote inductive arguments
whose premise (or premises) makes the conclusion more likely than not.
- If it doesn’t make sense to think of an argument as providing evidence or support for a
contention, it is probably because it is a deductive argument.
- Inductive arguments and deductive arguments can have unstated premises.
- Whether an argument is deductive or inductive may depend on what the unstated premise is
said to be.
- If an argument is written, diagramming it may help you understand it.
- Balance of considerations reasoning often involves deductive and inductive elements.
- Inference to best explanation is a common type of inductive reasoning in which a
supposition is said to be true because it states the best explanation of something we have
observed or otherwise know.

Hoofdstuk 3:
- Vague: wanneer we niet met zekerheid kunnen zeggen wat er wel of niet bij hoort.
- Ambiguous: wanneer iets meer dan één betekenis heeft.
- Semantic ambiguity: door een dubbelzinnig woord toe te voegen.
- Grouping ambiguity: wanneer het niet duidelijk is of een woord in een zin verwijst naar
een groep in het algemeen of naar de leden van de groep individueel.
- Syntactic ambiguity: komt voor wanneer een zin op meerdere manieren kan worden
geïnterpreteerd.
- Ambiguous pronoun references: wanneer het niet duidelijk is naar wie of wat een
voorzetsel verwijst.
- Generality: een gebrek aan specificatie.
- Lexical definitions: definities zoals we die in woordenboeken vinden.
- Precising or stipulative definitions: definities die bedoeld zijn om een term preciezer te
maken, minder vaag.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller guusjevanwijk. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $7.76. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

60904 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$7.76
  • (0)
  Add to cart