100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary on the text F. Fabbrini (2013). The Fiscal Compact, the ‘Golden Rule’ and the Paradox of European Federalism. $3.25   Add to cart

Summary

Summary on the text F. Fabbrini (2013). The Fiscal Compact, the ‘Golden Rule’ and the Paradox of European Federalism.

 57 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Summary on the text by F. Fabbrini (2013). The Fiscal Compact, the ‘Golden Rule’ and the Paradox of European Federalism. Boston College International and Comparative Law Review, 36, pp. 1-38.

Preview 2 out of 7  pages

  • December 15, 2018
  • 7
  • 2017/2018
  • Summary
avatar-seller
The Fiscal Compact, the “Golden Rule,” and the Paradox of European Federalism
Federico Fabbrini

INTRODUCTION

March 2012  25 EU MSs signed the Treaty on the Stability, Coordination, and Governance
in the Economic and Monetary Union (TSCG) aka the Fiscal Compact (FC)
 aim: strengthening budgetary discipline in the member states of the Euro-zone;
 reason: a satisfactory answer to the Euro-zone crisis;

A common supranational currency (the Euro) + a no-bail-out clause in Article 125 TFEU 
require tighter fiscal constraints in the Euro-zone member states

FC: imposes on MSs to enact the so-called “golden rule”—a requirement that annual
government budgets be balanced— in state constitutions  significantly increases the
involvement of supranational institutions in the fiscal sovereignty of the states and is
likely to affect the vertical balance of powers between the states and the EU

Aim of the Article: examine the “golden rule” articulated in the FC & the institutional
challenges that its adoption raises in four selected EU MSs; comparison of the
developments in European Monetary Union (EMU) with US fiscal federalism

Elements of US fiscal federalism:
- a single federal currency among its federated states,
- U.S. fed. gov. is barred from bailing out defaulting states,
- most U.S. states have budgetary constraints in their constitutions prohibiting
governments from running their budget at a deficit

I. The “Golden Rule” in the Fiscal Compact

Objective of the FC: re-affirm “the need for governments to maintain sound and
sustainable public finances and to prevent a general government deficit [from] becoming
excessive . . . [in order] to safeguard the stability of the euro area as a whole.”
 The objective was previously enshrined in Stability and Growth Pact (SGP, 1997;
currently attached as Protocol 12 to the TFEU)  MSs need to maintain their public
deficit below the yearly ratio of 3% of the GDP and the total public debt below 60% of
the GDP; weakness of enforcement mechanism of SGP  introduction of the
FC

Fiscal Compact:

Art. 3: obligation for the MSs to respect the “golden rule” of a balanced budget in every
fiscal year;
 3(1)(a): budgetary position shall be balanced or in surplus
 3(1)(b): the rule shall be deemed to be respected if the “annual structural balance of
the general government” is “with a lower limit of a structural deficit of 0.5% of GDP
at market prices
 3(1)(c): MSs may temporarily deviate from [the rule] only in exceptional
circumstances
 3(3)(b): an unusual event outside the control of the MSs concerned which has a
major impact on the financial position of the general government or to periods of
severe economic downturn

,  3(1)(e): automatically triggered corrective mechanisms in the event of significant
observed deviations

Art. 3 “golden rule”  upon ratification is binding for the 25 MSs as an obligation deriving
from international law

Art. 3(2)  requires states to enact the “golden rule” in the state constitutions or — where
this would be substantially impossible — in special domestic sources of law that are
hierarchically superior to ordinary acts of parliament and that can work as benchmarks for
the constitutional review of budgetary laws

To ensure constitutional compliance  art. 8 introduces a mechanism of ECJ judicial
enforcement

Non-compliance with the first ECJ decision: ECJ may impose “a lump sum or a penalty
payment appropriate in the circumstances and that shall not exceed 0.1% of its GDP; also:
financial assistance under the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) will be conditional
on compliance with the requirements of 3(2)

II. The “Golden Rule” in State Constitutions

IT, ESP, DE  parliamentary system
FR  semi-presidential system

A. Germany

Art. 3 FC  largely draws from the “golden rule” that Germany enacted in it’s the German
Constitution (GC) in July 2009

New Article §109 GC:
- reaffirmed the budgetary autonomy of the Federation and the Länder,
- noted their joint responsibility in the maintenance of the budgetary discipline set at the
EU level in the SGP,
- introduced the general rule that: the budgets of the Federation and the Länder shall in
principle be balanced without revenue from credits,
- should adjust  minor deviations on the basis of the economic cycle, market
developments,
o exceptions: natural disasters & unusual emergency situations; accompanied
by an amortization plan,
- Article 115(2) GC: “[t]his principle shall be satisfied when revenue obtained by the
borrowing of funds does not exceed 0.35 percent in relation to the nominal [GDP].” 
a more restrictive deficit brake than Article 3(1)(b) FC (0.5%)

B. Spain

New Article 135 of the Spanish Constitution (SC):
- commitment: [a]ll public administrations will conform their actions to the principle of
budgetary stability,
- State and the Autonomous Communities shall not incur a structural deficit that
exceeds the standard established by the EU,
- maximum structural deficit: specified in organic law (a special source of law with
infra-constitutional but supra legislative status),
- 135(3): constitutionalizes the limits of the SGP on public debt  not exceed the
reference value established in the TFEU,

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller taxgirl206. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $3.25. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

75632 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$3.25
  • (0)
  Add to cart