Gedetailleerde samenvatting van Beleid 2: Multi-level governance, artikelen + hoorcolleges
15 views 1 purchase
Course
BBO II
Institution
Universiteit Leiden (UL)
Gedetailleerde samenvatting van Beleid 2: Multi-level governance van iemand die alles goed bijhoudt en het vak met een 9,5 heeft afgerond! De hoorcolleges én artikelen zijn verwerkt
Inhoudsopgave
Hoorcollege 1; wat is multi-level governance? ................................................................................................. 2
Hooghe & Marks: Unraveling the Centra; State, but How? Types of Multi-level Governance....................... 2
Piattonsi: Multi-level governance; a Historical and Conceptual Analysis ..................................................... 8
Hoorcollege ............................................................................................................................................... 14
Hoorcollege 2; de uitdagingen van de overheid anno 21e eeuw, van government naar governance .............. 22
Peters & Pierre: Governance Without Government? .................................................................................. 22
Gjaltema et al.: From government to governance … to meta-governance ................................................. 33
Hoorcollege ............................................................................................................................................... 44
Hoorcollege 3; Veranderingen verticaal bestuur: veranderende rol voor de Nederlandse lokale overheid &
Multi-level governance ook “good governance” ............................................................................................ 50
Agranoff: Local Governments in Multileven Systems: Emergent Public Administration Challenges ........... 50
Fraanje & Herweijer: innoveren in samenwerking: een alternatief voor herindeling? ............................... 59
Mostert: Who should do what in environmental management? ................................................................ 69
Breeman & Van Eijk: Samenwerkend bestuur; bestuurlijke kaart van Nederland ...................................... 75
Hoorcollege ............................................................................................................................................... 76
Hoorcollege 4; Veranderingen horizontaal bestuur: veranderende rol van private actoren & Impact op de
overheid als publieke organisatie ................................................................................................................... 85
O’Leary & Vij: Collaborative Public Management ...................................................................................... 85
Van Eijk & Steen” The public encounter and the role of citizens ................................................................. 96
Breeman & Van Eijk: Samenwerkend bestuur; bestuurlijke kaart van Nederland .................................... 109
Hoorcollege ............................................................................................................................................. 109
,Hoorcollege 1; wat is multi-level governance?
Hooghe & Marks: Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-level
Governance
• Modern governance is, and should be, dispersed across multiple centers of authority;
but how should multi-level governance be organized? What are the basis
alternatives?
• The article states that the diffusion of decision making away from the central state
rase fundamental issues of design that can be conceptualized as 2 contrasting types
of governance
− Types are logically coherent + represent alternative responses to fundamental
problems of coordination
• The study of local government in the US + Western Europe bears directly on multi-
level, polycentric governance
• An influential starting point: Tiebout’s 1956 article
− Established the claim that competition among multiple local jurisdictions
leads to more efficient provision of local public services
• The literatures share the idea that dispersion of governance across multiple
jurisdictions is more flexible than concertation of governance in one jurisdiction
− Efficient governance adjusts jurisdictions to the trade-off between the virtues
+ vices of centralization
− Large jurisdictions are good because
- They have the virtue of exploiting economies of scale in the provision
of public goods
- Internalizing policy externalities, allowing for more efficient taxation
- Facilitating more efficient redistribution
- Enlarging the territorial scope of security and market exchange
− Large jurisdictions are bad when
- They impose a single policy on diverse ecological systems/territorially
heterogeneous populations
• Criticism of centralized government: It is insensitive to varying scale efficiencies from
policy to policy
− Economies of scale are more likely to characterize the production of capital-
intensive public goods, instead of labor-intensive services because economies
accrue from spreading costs over larger outputs
• There is consensus that flexible governance must be multi-level, but there is no
consensus about how MLG should be structured
There are 2 types
,Type 1
• Type I: Describes jurisdictions at limited number of levels which are general purpose;
they bundle together multiple functions, including a range of policy responsibilities +
court system + representative institutions
− Type I: beschrijft jurisdicties op een beperkt aantal niveaus die algemeen
bedoeld zijn; ze bundelen meerdere functies, waaronder een reeks
beleidsverantwoordelijkheden + rechtssysteem + representatieve instellingen
• Some characteristics:
− Describes jurisdictions at limited number of levels
− The jurisdictions (international, national, regional, meso, local) are general-
purpose
− They bundle together multiple functions, including policy responsibilities +
court system + representation institutions
− Membership boundaries don’t intersect
− Every citizen is located in a Russian Doll set of nested jurisdictions where
there is one and only relevant jurisdiction at any particular territorial scale
− Territorial jurisdictions are stable for periods of several decades
− Allocation of policy competencies across jurisdictional levels are flexible
• Intellectual foundation: Federalism
− Federalism is concerned with power sharing among limited number of
governments operating at a few levels + relationship between central
government and nonintersecting subnational governments
• Framework is systemwide, functions are bundles, levels of government are multiple
but limited in number
, • Characteristics
− General-purpose jurisdictions
- Decision making powers dispersed across jurisdictions, but bundled in
small number of packages
- Emphasize costs of decomposing authority into disparate packages
- Idea is strong in Europe, where local government usually eercises wide
spread of functions, reflecting the the concept of general-purpose
local authorities exercising comprehensive care for their communities”
(Norton 1991, 22)
− Nonintersecting Memberships
- Durable boundaries that are nonintersecting at any particular level
- Memberships of jurisdictions are higher + lower tiers don’t intersect
− Limited Number of Jurisdictional Levels
- Type I organizes jurisdictions at just a few levels
- It is common to distinguish local, intermediate, and central level
− Systemwide, Durable Architecture
- Systemic institutional choice
- Type I usually adopt the trias politicas structure in modern
democracies
- Type I are durable; jurisdictional reform is costly + unusual
- Institutions responsible for governance are sticky + tend to outlive
conditions that brought them into being
Type 2
• Type II: Composed of specialized jurisdictions, fragmented into functionally specific
pieces
• Some characteristics
− Composed of specialized jurisdictions
− Fragmented into functionally specific pieces
− Number of such jurisdictions is potentially huge + scale they operate vary
finely
− No great fixity in their existence
− Tend to be lean + flexible; they come and go as demands for governance
change
• Number of jurisdictions is potentially vast, rather than limited
• Don’t operate on just a few levels, but operate at numerous territorial scales
• Task specific, rather than general-purpose
• Conception is predominant among neoclassical economists + public choice theorists
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller isadruijts. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $8.22. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
