Summary Financial Statement Analysis (FSA) All rules, tips and helpfull answers from previous exams
388 views 14 purchases
Course
Financial Statement Analysis (323059)
Institution
Tilburg University (UVT)
Book
Financial Statement Analysis and Security Valuation
Have processed all the tricky multiple choice questions from previous exams of the past 10 years in a file. All rules regarding items etc. of the reformulated statements have also been incorporated. And understandable answers to a number of difficult old exam questions.
Summary Financial Statement Analysis and Security Valuation - 5th edition
Financial Statement Analysis - Summary
All for this textbook (4)
Written for
Tilburg University (UVT)
Finance
Financial Statement Analysis (323059)
All documents for this subject (4)
Seller
Follow
walterverdiesen
Reviews received
Content preview
FSA regels
Vraag 1
Enterprise value = mv of equity + mv of debt(= often bv)
DDM not good because dividends irrlevancy and dividends are a redistribution of the firm
capital funds
DCF not good, I perceived as value destroying, C-I is excess cash, connection to value is
weak, management discretion
Earnings/(1+r).. not good: double counting, discounting assumes e1 is reinvested at r, with no
div e1 contributes to e2 (e2=(1+r)er). Disc. Implicitely assumes e1 = 50 is reinvested at 5%
discount rate. E2 explicitelty takes into account reinvestment of e1.
Correct for earnings that we would expect Re(t) = e(t) -r*bv(t-1)
Case 1: Re =0, cv=0. Case 2: Re = constant, cv = Re/r, AEG = 0, cv=0. Case 3: Re grows at
rate g, cv =Re/(r-g), AEG grows at rate g, cv = AEG/(r-g)
Normal forward P/E ratio=1/r. P0/E1 > 1/r, market expects postive future AEG
Firms comprehensive income is independant on FCF (C-I)
Normal PEG ratio = (1+r)/r*100%. PEG ratio = (forward p/e)/ 2-year ahead earnings growth.
PEG> normal, market overprices expected growth. In theory lower PEG, the better, paying
less for future earnings growth. Although other explanation for first sentence…
Why sell put warrants: Compmay believes stock is undervalued, commitment to repurchase
program.
Without NFE, OI=CI
Financing activities don’t create value, only operating assets. influence ROCE
RE or AEG creats value for common shareholders.
Financial leverage increases investment risk of common shareholders affects cost of
capital. Re = rf + Vd/Ve (rf-rd). Re increases with financial leverage
Unleverd P/B = NOA mv/NOA bv
Levered P/B = CSE mv/CSE bv
---------------
Enterprise price = equity price + NFO
Rf on firms OA does not depend on the degree of financial leverage
, Alle Hidden Dirty Surpluses uit equity statement gaan ook Income Statement in, CI van de 2
moet hetzelfde zijn
Differences between P and E and P and B reflects future expectations of the market, the higher
the difference, the higher the expectations. But growth in future earnings doesnt have tob e
high necessarily
Comparebles not a good valuation model, also not in effecient markets
Effect of FINLEV depends whether spread is positive or negative
HDS can involve cash payments
The difference between dirty and Hidden dirty surplus: dirty surpus flows are reported in the
financial statements
SF2 forecast assumes reinvestments do not create value, ?SF3 does?
Normal P/E ratio decreases with financial leverage
Not the granting but exersizing of stock options results in HDS
AEG model assumes earnings for each period are persistent
Use re when doing P/E, not rf
Required rate of return rf on the firms net operating does not depend on the degree of financial
leverage.
Screening results in a trading strategy
Timing of future pay outs is only value irrelevant when reinvestments earns the required rate
of return
Pv of ReOI is not the same as PV of AOIG
In Re model, g cant be greater than r, in cv??
The normal P/E ratio is equal to 1/r . Since r increases with the degree of Fnancial leverage,
the normal P/E ratio decreases with the degree of financial leverage.
A simple forecast type SF3 assumes that residual operating income and net operating assets
grow at the same rate.
The forward P/E ratio doesnt have to be lower than the trailing P/E ratio.
For a high tech firm with many intangible assets, the abnormal earnings growth model is
prefered over the residual income model.
Information gained from a pro_t and growth analysis is not used in a simple type SF2 forecast.
A simple forecast type SF3 depends on the _rm's future investments in net operating assets.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller walterverdiesen. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $4.29. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
