100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
ITL Exercise 5 $6.96
Add to cart

Answers

ITL Exercise 5

 61 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Answer of the Exercise assigned for week 5 of the course International Trade Law of the Master Globalisation and Law at Maastricht University.

Preview 2 out of 6  pages

  • January 30, 2019
  • 6
  • 2017/2018
  • Answers
  • Unknown
avatar-seller
International Trade Law
Exercise 5: Ethical & Safe Cofee
- The three measures mentioned in Exercise 3 are deemed to violate
WTO law for the purpose of this exercise, these measures being:
1. The labelling of ‘organic’ and ‘non-organic’ cofee in Welland to
complement diferential tax treatment and diferentiation of
customs duties of organic and non-organic cofee (which are
being applied because of humanitarian-, environmental- and
health concerns);
2. The VAT for organic unroasted cofee is lowered to 18,5% ad
valorem, the VAT for non-organic unroasted cofee is maintained
on the current level of 19% ad valorem, and the VAT for non-
organic roasted cofee is heightened to 21% ad valorem (which
are being applied because of humanitarian-, environmental- and
health concerns);
3. The customs duty diferentiation between organic unroasted
cofee of 8% ad valorem, non-organic unroasted cofee of 10% ad
valorem, and non-organic roasted cofee of 15% ad valorem
(which is applied because of humanitarian-, environmental- and
health concerns).
- First of all, when it comes to exceptions of GATT-violations, there is
a twofold path that Welland could take, namely either justifying the
measure under the Article XX-justifcations, which require a two-
tier test (provisionally meeting one of the subparagraph
requirements and meeting the requirements set out in the chapeau
of the article), or the justifcations provided in Article XXI of the
GATT. Article XXI-justifcations (with regards to national and
international security on the basis of military means) seem to be out
of question in this case, since the favourable treatment of organic
cofee is not something stipulated by a UNSC Resolution (meaning
it would fall within the ambit of international security under Article
XXI GATT) neither does the production method/chemical substances



1

, in the cofee threaten national security in any way relating to
fssionable materials, trade in arms or military materials, and it has
nothing to do with times of war and an emergency in international
relations (meaning it would fall within the ambit of national security
under Article XXI GATT). Hence, we need to look at the violations in
light of Article XX of the GATT.
- Hence, the justifcation of these violations must be sought under
Article XX of the GATT, which requires a two-tier test as stipulated
before. Hereafter, the three measures shall be seen together when
analysing the provided justifcations in Article XX (a) – (j) of the
GATT, but in the analysis of necessity under the frst tier they could
be taken apart and this aspect can then in turn be analysed
separately. Similarly, in the second tier of the test, the measures
will be taken apart when it is needed and analysed separately. The
analysis of Article XX goes as follows:
o Justifcation under (a) – (j), subparagraphs chosen on the
basis of whether they are likely to be approved by the
panel/Appellate Body:
 (a)  necessary to protect public morals:
 In China – Publications and Audiovisual Products,
the Panel established that public morals are to be
defned by the country itself, so in principle,
Welland will be able to meet this criterion if it is
argued that human rights violations and the
concerns about these violations will constitute
public morality. i.e. the objective of the measures
above is protecting public morals with regards to
human rights violations by labelling and
diferentially treating organic and non-organic
cofee;
 In line with China – Publications and Audiovisual
Products, Welland should argue that non-organic
cofee beans which have not been produced with


2

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller rx. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $6.96. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

53068 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$6.96
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added