Summary

Summary OCR A Level Law: Human Rights Law

0 purchase

Course
Human Rights (H418)

Institution
OCR

Comprehensive All you need to know for the OCR A Level Law Paper 3, Section B: Human Rights Law from an A* Student All Cases and Legislation included and all substantive topics covered.

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 10 pages

View example

Uploaded on April 21, 2024
Number of pages 10
Written in 2023/2024
Type Summary

human rights
ocr
a level
law
article 5
article 6
article 8
margin of appreciation
article 10
article 11
evaluation
human rights in domestic law

Study Level
A/AS Level
Examinator
OCR
Subject
Law
Unit
Human Rights (H418)

marcoxue15

Member since 10 months 1 documents sold

$12.42

Add to cart

Save

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Key Provisions of the European Convention of Human Rights

Article 5: Right to Liberty and Security

Article 5 is a limited right which covers the freedom from deprivation of liberty by unlawful
detention or arrest. A person has had their liberty deprived when they are detained for a
period of time, unlawfully when they have not consented to the detention, or lawfully when
the reason for the detention is set by the state. These have been consolidated in the “acid
test” (Cheshire v P): whether an individual is ‘under continuous supervision and control and
not allowed to leave’. They can be deprived of liberty ‘even if their departure is not prevented
by a locked door or other physical barrier, and even when allowed extensive contact with the
outside world’ (Austin v Commissioner of Police).

Article 5(1) guarantees an individual’s liberty and security, protecting them against arbitrary
arrest and detention. For any detention to be lawful, it must follow a prescribed procedure
under Article 5(1)(a-f):
- a) detention after due process and conviction by court
- b) detention and arrest of those who breach court orders and/or fail to fulfil
obligations under law
- c) detention/arrest of someone suspected of having committed an offence
- d) detention of a minor for educational supervision or to bring him before a legal
authority
- e) detention to prevent the spread of infectious disease, of persons of unsound
minds, alcoholics, drug addicts or vagrants
- f) lawful arrest to prevent the unauthorised entry to a country or of a person who is to
be extradited or deported

Article 5(2) requires those who have been arrested to be given a reason, in a language they
understand, promptly after the arrest. These are most covered under the PACE Act 1984. It
must be prompt, and need not be immediate (Fox, Campbell and Hartley v UK).

Article 5(3) ensures that no one stays detained for too long before trial. They must be
brought before a judge promptly (Brogan v UK), an entitlement to bail and to be tried within
a reasonable time. Bail may be refused if Defendant is a flight risk, considered dangerous to
the public, or to protect themselves under the Bail Act.

Article 5(4) allows for any challenge to unlawful detention. This is Habeus Corpus. Anyone
deprived of their livery can take proceedings under Judicial Review to have the lawfulness of

, Key Provisions of the European Convention of Human Rights
their detention speedily decided by a court. Those detained must have their detention
regularly reviewed (Stafford v UK) and must have access to courts, impartial and
independent authority (R v Bow Street Magistrartes ex parte Pinochet), speedy decisions
(R v Sec State ex parte Noorkoiv), and determinate sentences to be reviewed regularly or
indeterminable ones allowed to be challenged.

Article 5(5) gives those who are victim to a deprivation of liberty a mandatory right to
compensation.

There are specific circumstances in which the rights under Article 5 ECHR can be limited.

One of these is in regards to terror suspects. Deprivation is a matter of ‘degree and intensity’
of involvement within terrorist activities as to whether it will be lawful or not (Guzzardi v
Italy). Originally, the courts made a declaration of incompatibility in the case of A and
Others v UK 2004, where it was held that the process of detaining terror suspects without
charge or trial was unlawful. Following this, the UK derogated its powers to bring in a control
order which offered the Home Secretary an unlimited range of restrictions upon foreign terror
suspects, avoiding the need for prosecution. These were replaced by Terrorism Prevention
and Investigation Measures (TPIMs) in 2012 which allow the Home Secretary to restrict a
person's freedom and liberty.

Another circumstance is regarding hospital and parental care. When a person of sound mind
is living with and cared for by his parents, friends, or relatives in a family home, foster care,
or in sheltered accommodation, there will normally not be a deprivation of liberty. It will
become an issue when the patient has learning difficulties or special needs (JE v DE)-
where despite having freedom to do things, he would be brought back to the home if he was
to escape, amounting to an unlawful deprivation of liberty.
Parental restrictions do not usually offend Article 5, but a two-year Secure Accommodation
order by the courts was held to be a breach.

Kettling is when people are held by the police in an area as a means of controlling a
demonstration with no statutory authority and does not expressly fall under the prescribed
procedures under Article 5(1). It was held that if kettling was done in good faith and was
proportionate and no longer than necessary, then there would not be a breach of Article 5
(Austin v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis).

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller marcoxue15. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $12.42. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

66184 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 15 years now

Start selling

Summary

Summary OCR A Level Law: Human Rights Law

Document information

Subjects

Written for

Seller

Reviews received

Content preview