100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Introduction to EU law $4.88   Add to cart

Class notes

Introduction to EU law

 120 views  3 purchases
  • Course
  • Institution

High-quality notes for the Introduction to EU law part of the course of Introduction to International and European law Included: text from the PP and everythign mentioned during the lectures Certain concepts explained more profoundly

Preview 4 out of 35  pages

  • February 20, 2019
  • 35
  • 2017/2018
  • Class notes
  • Unknown
  • All classes
avatar-seller
Intro to EU law notes
A. Costov

Explanatory note:

- Cases
- Provisions
- Citations/paragraphs
- Important information
- Negative connotation (e.g. prohibition)
- Positive connotation (e.g. permission)
- EXAM

Hope you find my notes helpful. Good luck!

Anna




1

,Intro to EU law notes
A. Costov


Lecture 1: History, Autonomy and Supremacy
DEVELOPMENT OF EU LAW

- Original purpose:
o To ensure peace and well-being  Art. 3(2) TEU
- Means: Integration of socio-economic development (share resources, values and views)
o Neo-functionalism  let’s share resources so we don’t have to fight for them
 Deepening of EU law (Art. 4 TEU)
 Spill-over  successfully integrate one area and go deeper (because of its success
integration spills over other sectors)
o Expansion through MS  territorial expansion
 Widening of the EU
- Nature: 3 forms of co-operation can be recognized in treaties of EU; all 3 work at the same time
o Intergovernmentalism  allows states to cooperate in specific fields while retaining their
sovereignty
 E.g. CFSP
o Supranationalism  majority of cases: supranational approach (where states lost veto power)
 Power is delegated to authority by governments of MS
 E.g. Commission, ECJ
o Federalism  at heart of the integration process
 There is a direct connection between MS and the EU

DEEPENING of EU law

- In the beginning  coal and steel; other areas added with time: energy, workers, social protection, etc.
- Successful integration of one sector  spill over to other sectors
o Neo-functionalism
o From socio-economic to political
- 1952  Coal and Steel Community (ECSC): France, Germany, Italy, Benelux
o Created to integrate one industrial sector
- 1957 – ongoing  Market and Nuclear Energy Integration
o Treaties of Rome: EEC, Euratom
- 1992 – ongoing  Socio-Political aspect (rights)
o Maastricht: 3 communities  EU (merged)
- 2009 – ongoing  Fundamental Rights, Monetary Union
- Variable speed in the integration process  has never been constant
o E.g. 1966-1980 – Eurosclerosis: France refused to fully participate  high unemployment, slow
job creation  no political unanimity between MS
o Luxemburg Accords 1966: De Gaulle boycotted EU because of its supranationalism (the
Commission)  compromise:
 Veto power
 QMV
 Restrain to the Commission
2

,Intro to EU law notes
A. Costov

o Economic crisis 1970
o 2008 – ongoing economic crisis

EU has two purposes:

1. General = peace and well-being
2. Individual = e.g. studying abroad, pursuing individual interests

WIDENING of the EU (MS) Art. 49 TEU

- 1957  6 MS
- 1973  9 MS
- 1981  10 MS
- 1986  12 MS
- 1999  15 MS
- 2004  25 MS
- 2007  27 MS
- 2013  28 MS
- 2017  ?

INTERGOVERNMENTAL SET-UP

- Rome (1957)
- Nice (2001)
- Rome (2005)
o Failure
- Lisbon (2007)
- All are int. treaties but have to be read in the EU way. EU way of reading differs from international

SUPRANATIONAL SET-UP

- SEA 1987 (Single European Act)
o From unanimity to QMV in the Council (int. market)
o About 270 Directives of the 280 adopted in 5 years after the change
o Directives creating and governing internal market
- Legal change in votes  fastened the political process
- Maastricht Treaty 1992
o From EEC to EC (social policy, more intergovernmentalism)
o EU (CFSP & JHA)  intergovernmental
o Council shares legislative powers with EP
- Amsterdam 1997
o More QMV and more co-decision
- Rome 2005
- Lisbon 2007
o TEU and TFEU (more QMV and co-decision)
o CFSP still intergovernmental
o Charter of Fundamental Rights
3

, Intro to EU law notes
A. Costov

o Steady increase of supranational character

NATURE OF EU LAW

New legal order with special characteristics: autonomous and supreme

- AUTONOMY (Van Gend en Loos)
o EU itself decides on its applicability in national orders (11-19)
o Court of Justice asked to clarify what is the legal order, meaning of the treaties and the nature of the
EC
o Should we (states, here  NL) use national or EU law?
o ECJ: EU is an autonomous legal order and decides how it creates and affects national legal orders
of the MS by itself = power to decide how to influence national legal orders
o EU decides how to create rights and obligations
 Monist approach: international law automatically incorporated into national system
 Dualist approach: international law is transposed into national system as national law
o BUT: independently of MS’ approaches to int. law, EU is an autonomous legal order and decides
how it is going to create rights and obligations by itself
- SUPREMACY (Costa/ENEL)
o Precedence of EU law over conflicting national law (12-19)
o National courts: lex posterior derogate legi anteriori BUT!
o EU law prevails regardless the time when national law was enacted
- National Identity:
o Article 3(2) TEU, Article 4(2) TEU
o Compatible with supranationalism because was created by the supranational power: supreme EU
law orders us to respect national identity

2 PERSPECTIVES on the question of SUPREMACY

- EU perspective:
o All Union laws prevail over all national laws all the time
- National perspective:
o Some national law is considered to be beyond the supremacy of the EU ; expressed in 2 contexts:
 EU law cannot violate national fundamental rights
 MS insists they have the last word regarding the competences of the Union (=deny Union’s
unlimited competences)
- Because of the nature of EU law, MS introduced institutional principles




4

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller annacostov. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $4.88. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

64438 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$4.88  3x  sold
  • (0)
  Add to cart