Unit 23 - Aspects of the Legal System and Law-making Process
All documents for this subject (16)
1
review
By: sofia24 • 4 year ago
Seller
Follow
Dvacarciuc
Reviews received
Content preview
Compare and contrast the methods of law making
1.0 TERMS OF REFERENCE
1.1. On Tuesday 23rd of February …asked me to create a report which compares
and contrasts the different methods of law making.Therefore it must be included the
advantages and disadvantages of judicial precedent, avoiding precedent and
creating an Act of Parliament (support each point which case and Act examples) and
providing similarities and differences between statute and precedent.
2.0 PROCEDURE
2.1 In order to write this report I will use the following information: -
- the notes from my classroom
- the information from P6 and P7
- the internet sources about the statute and precedent
3.0 FINDINGS
Parliament (legislature) is a body with the highest legislative authority in the United
Kingdom as it checks and examines the work of government.Therefore it is debating
and approving the new laws that are offered by the government. The Parliament is
consisted of The House of Commons (elected MPs) and the House of Lords.
A Bill can only become an Act of parliament when the House of Lords and the MPs
both vote to support it.However through the Act of Parliament 1911 and 1949 the
House of Lord power to reject a Bill was limited. A Bill can still become a law if
rejected by the Lords provided it is re- introduced into the HOL.
3.1 Judicial precedent
Judicial precedent is the system that involves common law and where the majority of
judges are created laws in order for the future judges to follow.Therefore it stand
from ‘what went before let it stand or to stand by the decision’.Also there are three
types of precedent which are binding precedent ,persuasive precedent and original
precedent.
A binding precedent is the part of a judgement that other judges have to follow from
an earlier case.In addition the inferior judges must follow these precedent even if
they do not agree with the made decisions but the fact are enough similar to the
cases that was heard earlier by the judge who is superior therefore who made the
decision.In contrast to the binding precedent, the persuasive precedent need not be
followed, but it may be helpful to a judge making a decision. If a judge decides to
follow a past decision that was not binding, the decision is said to be
persuaded.Furthermore the persuasive precedents consists of :
- a decision of a lower court (R v R, 1991 case that was heard by the House of
Lords. The case involved a defendant who was charged with the attempted rape of
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Dvacarciuc. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $7.19. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.