Is Aristotle's Virtue Theory an accurate account of morality? (25)
30 views 0 purchase
Course
Moral Philosophy
Institution
AQA
Book
AQA A-level Philosophy Year 1 and AS
Is Aristotle's Virtue Theory an accurate account of morality? (25) - 25 mark essay A* grade on Aristotle's virtue ethics for moral philosophy topic in a level philosophy AQA
Flashcards for 'limits of knowledge' Module for Epistemolgy topic of A level Philosophy AQA.
Flashcards for 'reason as a source of knowledge' Module for Epistemolgy topic of A level Philosophy AQA.
All for this textbook (13)
Written for
A/AS Level
AQA
Philosophy
Moral Philosophy
All documents for this subject (36)
Seller
Follow
miaapfel
Reviews received
Content preview
Is Aristotle's Virtue Theory an accurate account of morality? (25)
In this essay, I will argue that Aristotelian virtue ethics is a convincing moral theory. I will
refute the objections to the theory, such as the claims that it holds no clear guidance or leads
to conflicts between virtues. Instead, I will contend that it is successful as an account of
moral responsibility because of its realistic, flexible nature and focus on what it actually
means to be a human being.
Aristotle’s virtue ethics is an aretaic theory which focuses on the development of virtues and
good moral character. I would argue that since it is agent centred rather than act centred, the
theory is already strengthened by the fact that it takes the narrative or history of a person's
life into account, rather than focusing upon impractical moral dilemmas. At the core of the
theory is the ultimate good or final end of eudaimonia - the good life for human beings, for
the sake of which everything else is done. Aristotle also uses the terms ergon (the function
or characteristic activity of a thing) and arete (the property or virtue that enables a thing to
achieve its ergon) to show that we can only achieve eudaimonia through exercising our
reason.
I believe that one strength of Aristotlean virtue ethics is its realistic nature and sharp focus
on what it actually means to be a human being. Aristotle, in his skill analogy argues, and I
agree, that developing virtues is somewhat analogous to developing a skill such as learning
to ride a bike or play the piano. Nobody is born knowing how to play the piano, but we are
born with the capacity to know how to play the piano. Likewise, nobody is born virtuous, but
we are born with the capacity to become virtuous. Furthermore, you cannot learn to play the
piano by just acquiring knowledge on piano playing, you have to actually practise the activity.
Likewise, you cannot become virtuous by just acquiring knowledge on what it means to be a
good person, you have to actually act virtuously (i.e. doing good actions) because ‘like
actions become dispositions’. I believe that this analogy makes virtue ethics convincing
because as it explores the development of moral reasoning throughout an agent’s life, it
allows you to learn from your mistakes and become a good person over time. This is
something which Anscombe picks up on in her arguments for virtue ethics. Criticising
modern moral philosophy’s preoccupation with a law conception of ethics which deals
exclusively with obligation and duty, she argues that we cannot be our own self-legislators.
Instead, Ascombe calleds for a return to concepts such as character, virtue and flourishing.
Thus, a strength of virtue ethics is that it does not focus on obligation, but on what it means
to be a human being.
However, it could be argued that an issue with Aristotle’s virtue ethics is that it is an
imprecise theory since it has no clear guidance or rules on how to act in a particular
situation. The golden mean - the concept used to explain how virtues are the intermediate
between two extremes (vices of deficiency and of excess) - suggests that where a virtue lies
between the two extremes varies depending on the situation. For example, courage is a
virtue between the vices of cowardice and recklessness. Aristotle says that it is correct to act
courageously, or even angrily sometimes - but he does not tell us when exactly this should
be or how angry we should get before it crosses over from a virtue to a vice. Hence, every
situation is different and there is no single rule or criteria against which to judge whether one
course of action is better than another. The golden mean does not give actual quantities,
only vague descriptions such as “not too much” and “not too little”. In fact, Aristotle himself
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller miaapfel. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $5.28. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
