100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
OCR A Level History A (2015): Changing Nature of Warfare - Sample Essay Plan: The coordination of forces remained a problem throughout the period. How far do you agree with this view of the period ? $3.89
Add to cart

Other

OCR A Level History A (2015): Changing Nature of Warfare - Sample Essay Plan: The coordination of forces remained a problem throughout the period. How far do you agree with this view of the period ?

2 reviews
 34 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

The Changing Nature of Warfare 1792–1945 - Unit Y315 Sample Essay plan on the topic of the Coordination of Forces. Written by student who achieved a top A* in 2018

Preview 1 out of 1  pages

  • March 18, 2019
  • 1
  • 2017/2018
  • Other
  • Unknown

2  reviews

review-writer-avatar

By: driaz345 • 4 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: bacong • 4 year ago

avatar-seller
"The coordination of forces remained a problem throughout the period" How far do you agree with this
view of the period 1792-1945?



Undoubtedly evidence to suggest that it remained problematic in the early part of the period.
Coordination of forces within armies
● Crimean War
○ British armies → Charge of the Light Brigade at Balaclava 1854
■ Lack of coordination between Cardigan and Lucan led to the gross mis-communication
of orders at Balaclava → disastrous Charge of the Light Brigade, where 197 out of 627
calvary were shot down in the space of 4 minutes.
● Franco-Austrian
○ Austrian armies → Austrian reserve army notorious for getting lost eg. Solferino failed to appear
on the battlefield, 20 miles away
Inter-Alliance coordination
● Napoleonic Wars
○ Napoleon's Ulm-Austerlitz campaign 1805.
■ Lack of co-ordination between the 4th coalition was seen clearly in the fact that Austria
and Russia were using different calendars, meaning Russian forces arrived too late to
save the Austrian forces at Ulm and arguably doom the campaign
● Crimean War
○ Distrust between French and British was very problematic, with 4 allied commanders waging
war by consensus
■ impossible for the allies to agree on a positive course of action.
● eg. Sevastopol 1854 - the British Admirals developed plans for a naval
diversion, but the French general changed them
○ ⇒ led the fleets to fight a costly action for no purpose, because no-one
told them it was no longer necessary.
That said, there was striking exception → Napoleon + Berthier's Imperial HQ
● the French army dispersed over 200 miles in Bataillon Carré formation came together to encircle the
Austrians at Ulm 1805 under the coordinated orders from Berthier's Imperial HQ
However overall, on the whole the coordination of forces clearly remained a serious problem through the start
of the period.

By contrast later in the period, the coordination of forces became far less of a problem due to the
developments of strong general staff systems and communication technologies
Strong General Staff system = forces could be coordinated effectively
● Prussian General staff – Wars of German Unification
○ Eg. minutely detailed timetables were used to rapidly mobilize and converge 250,000 troops at
Könnigrätz in 1866, resulting in a decisive Prussian victory
● Oyama - Russo-Japanese War (1904-5)
○ From his HQ Oyama received front line reports via telephone and issued new instructions
immediately
■ Meant artillery and infantry could be effectively coordinated to pin down enemy troops
whilst advancing eg. Battle of Mukden 1805
Developments in communication meant that even the mass armies of World Wars could be coordinated
● Co-ordinated attacks (combined operations): infantry + newly developed tanks + aircraft under a
united command (Ferdinand Foch).
○ e.g. effectively deployed on a mass scale at Battle of Verdun 1916
The telegraph, radio and telephone had the most dramatic impact, as they allowed for instantaneous
transmission of messages and enabled greater co-ordination on the battlefield.
● Strikingly seen at D-Day (June 1944) - mass coordination between British and American forces → 5,000
ships landed 156,000 troops

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller robmaclennan15. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $3.89. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

52355 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$3.89
  • (2)
Add to cart
Added