100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Class notes

adult and graduate studies

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
161
Uploaded on
09-05-2024
Written in
2023/2024

Indirect Assessment: Indirect assessment is student self-reported data such as endofcourse (EOC), entrance and exit program surveys. Formal Assessment: Formal assessment is planned assessment activities such as program and/or specialization assessment. Informal Assessment: Informal assessment is unplanned information such as unsolicited faculty or student phone calls. Continuous Improvement Curriculum Development Model The School’s continuous improvement curriculum development model consists of formal and informal, as well as direct and indirect assessment, activities. Formal assessment includes feedback from faculty on course faculty feedback forms, student responses on end-of-course surveys, the Business & Leadership Advisory Council, and program surveys. Informal assessment includes unsolicited faculty and student e-mails and phone calls. All formal and informal assessment information is archived in a curriculum database by program and course for use in course revisions and program assessments. Course assessment information is distributed to course writers and/or curriculum focus groups, as well as Program Directors, to help provide insights for possible curriculum revisions. Appendix A provides an overview of SBL’s Continuous Improvement Curriculum Development Model. Periodic Program Assessment Periodic program assessment, with information from both direct and indirect assessments as well as formal and informal activities, is planned in coordination with the Associate Dean of Institutional Effectiveness. Program assessment activities include alumni surveys, employer surveys, employer focus groups, pre and post testing, and review of a representative sampling of student products by faculty. Appendix B lists the programs and fiscal years for periodic program assessments. Business & Leadership Advisory Council SBL initiated its Business & Leadership Advisory Council, a stakeholder group of business leaders from Indiana and Ohio, soon to include business leaders from Kentucky, to serve in an advisory capacity to provide external assessment of our programs. The Advisory Council also helps SBL build on and advance its existing relationships with the business communities it serves. The Advisory Council meets twice a year, in the fall and spring. In its October 2008 meeting, the Advisory provided feedback on our proposed sustainability certificate, and in its May 2009 meeting, the Advisory provided feedback on our proposed Executive MBA and proposed Bachelor Specialization in Human Resources. Undergraduate Scoring Guide for Major Written Assignments Based on feedback from faculty, also supported by student feedback, the School implemented the use of a scoring guide as a way to better communicate expectations to students and to provide more objective feedback from faculty on major written assignments. Scoring 13 guidelines include: met objectives/requirements of assignment (35%), critical thinking (35%), APA formatting (15%), mechanics (grammar, spelling, and word choice, punctuation and sentence structure) (15%). Graduate Business programs are implementing different rubrics for written assignments as a way of providing clear descriptions of performance expectations for graduate students. Please see Appendix C for the Undergraduate Scoring Guide for Major Written Assignments. Council for Christian Colleges and Universities (CCCU) Adult Student Learning Outcomes Project SBL’s undergraduate programs participated in this benchmarking student learning outcomes project in FY 2008-09 sponsored by the CCCU Center for Research in Adult Learning. This study used an assessment instrument with 5-point Likert scale to evaluate critical thinking, Christian world-view, and written communication skills of student responses to an ethical dilemma. Based on a representative sample of data (CCCU Center for Research in Adult Learning, July 2009) it was found that in comparison with the five other participant institutions, IWU exceeded those institutions in critical thinking and written communication results but had a lower score on Christian world-view. SBL will continue to participate in this study in the future. Table 1 provides a summary of the benchmarking results of this project. Table 1: IWU Benchmarking Results (CCCU Center for Research in Adult Learning, July 2009) IWU Benchmarking Results Indiana Wesleyan Compared to other CCCU College N Mean Std. Dev Critical Thinking IWU 442 3.28 0.81 Other 1149 3.19 0.63 Christian World-view IWU 442 *1.50 0.79 Other 1149 *1.96 0.79 Written Communication IWU 442 *3.34 0.73 Other 1149 *3.05 0.85 *t-tests indicate a significant difference between schools (p.05) Critical Thinking Initiative Based on faculty feedback in early 2009, the decision was made to add more instructional emphasis specifically to critical thinking to business programs in order to strengthen our existing 14 critical thinking outcomes. The following textbooks with instructional emphasis on critical thinking are scheduled to be added to SBL Business programs. Undergraduate Business Programs with implementation date of 3/1/10: Browne, M.N. & Keeley, S.M. (2007). Asking the Right Questions (7th ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall ISBN 0-13-220304-9 Graduate Business Programs with implementation date of 7/1/10: Paul, R. & Elder, L. (2006). Critical Thinking: Learn the Tools the Best Thinkers Use (Concise Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall ISBN 0-13-170347-1 Transition of Onsite Cohorts to BlackBoard Based on an assessment by faculty, SBL will add BlackBoard components to onsite cohorts with Master of Business Administration (MBA) and Bachelor of Science in Business Information Systems (BSBIS) new cohorts that start on or after April 1, 2010 and with the remaining SBL Business programs new cohorts that start on or after July 1, 2010. The addition of BlackBoard will include the submission of written assessments through BlackBoard which provide a convenient method to archive written assignments for assessment activities as well as to confirm original work (avoid plagiarism). Section 2 documents course revisions based on the assessment data that was collected, as well as reports on scheduled program assessment.

Show more Read less
Institution
Course

Content preview

Table of Contents
Executive Summary………………………………………………………………………..…3
Progress on Assessment Goals for 2008-09.……….……………………………………..5 Higher Learning
Commission Assessment Academy……………………………………..6
CCCU Adult Student Learning Outcomes Project………………………………………...8
Business and Management……………………………...……………………….………..10
Associate Programs………………………………..………………………..…….14
Bachelor Programs…………………………………………………………….….16
Masters Programs………………………………………………………………....18
Graduate Leadership Program (DOL)……………………………………………20
Assessment Plans…………………………………………………………….…....23 Curriculum
Development Process…………………………………………….….43
Five Year Assessment Plan ………………………………………………………44
Undergraduate Scoring Guide for Major Written Assignments………………….45 School of

, 2



Education Leadership .……………..……………………………………...…..46
MED…………………………………………………………………………...…...46
PLP……………………………………………………………………......………..48
TTT…………………………………………………………………………………53
ELMS/ELMO………………………………………………………………...…….56
RNNBSN/RNBSNO ……….……………………...…………………………….……........60
Liberal Arts and Electives……………….……………………………………………..…..73 Graduate
Studies in Ministries……………………………………………………..………76
Graduate Studies in Nursing………………………………………………………..……...79
Graduate Counseling………………………………………………………………….…….80
Annual Survey Reports…………………………………………………………….……….83 Student
Satisfaction Survey………………………………………………………..85
Entrance Survey……………………………………………………………..……..92
End of Program……………………………………………………..……………...99
Graduation Rates………………………………………………………..…………103
Spiritual Transformation Inventory..……………………………………….……..108 Student
Services Assessment Plans…………..………………………………..…….…….112
Advising………………………………………………………………………..…..112
Chaplaincy……………………………………………………………………… .113
Off Campus Library Services………………………………………….…………….….…114
Assessment Goals for 2009-10………………………………………………….……....…115
Five-Year Program Review and Assessment Schedule…………………….……….…….116

Annual Assessment Report
College of Adult and Professional Studies,
Seminary and School of Nursing
2008-2009

Harry D. Hall, Ed.D.
Associate Dean for Institutional Effectiveness

Executive Summary

1. The highlights of assessment activities for FY 2008-09 include:

• Change in leadership in Institutional Effectiveness;
• Reconfiguration of CAPS and IWU;
• Development of a framework for faculty to use in defining student learning outcomes
focused on mission requirements and based on World Changer Aims;
• Participation in the Higher Learning Commission Assessment Academy and
implementation of a project on assessment of World Changer Outcomes;
• Continuation of the Higher Learning Commission Self Study;
• Second year of a joint project with five other Christian colleges to benchmark student
learning outcomes in Christian worldview, critical thinking and written communication;
• Sponsorship of an Adult Education Conference involving 95 people from 30 Christian
colleges, supported by a Lilly Scholarship Grant;

, 3


• Development and pilot of an Adult Spiritual Formation Inventory in collaboration with a
Task Force from several CCCU colleges;
• Establishment of a CCCU Center for Research in Adult Learning; and
• Continuing work on CCCU Task Forces on Retention in Adult Education, Spiritual
Development of Adult Students, and Return on Investment in Adult Programs.

2. Progress on assessment goals for 2008-2009. Thanks to the dedicated work by Dr. Tweedell
and the assistants in Institutional Effectiveness, all of the goals were accomplished and the
outcomes served to focus efforts to develop new goals for 2009-2010.

3. Assessment Academy. The Academy has struggled at times to develop university outcomes in
general and specifically for general education. It appears that process is moving forward with
Dr. Bressler directing the undergraduate effort and Dr. Fuller leading the graduate learning
outcome development based on the framework for character, scholarship, and leadership.
Additionally, Dr. Sprowl has coordinated a writing assessment that will assess written
communication across all colleges in the university.

4. The results of two years worth of data for the CCCU Adult Student Learning Outcomes Project
for 2009 indicates that for most measures our students experience significant growth (pre
versus post tests). Aggregating the data (benchmarking) seems to indicate a continuing
weakness in the Christian worldview of our students. However, the 2008 and 2009 data are
inconsistent and therefore any discussion of trends would be not recommended.

5. The School of Business and Leadership (SBL) has initiated the use of a Business and
Leadership Council, a group of Indiana and Ohio business leaders, which meets on a regular
basis to discuss regional business education needs.

6. The School of Education Leadership (SOEL) continued to hold Assessment Days for all
programs which produced many innovative ideas sparked constructive curricular changes. The
electronic data system (EDS) has been refined to inform administrators of the impact of
program changes.

7. RNBSN/RNBSNO utilized their revised assessment plan to improve their program using data
and research.

8. Liberal Arts and Electives monitored quality measures and has been refining and improving
courses and programs.

9. Utilizing rich survey data, Graduate Ministries (Seminary) has been improving their programs
so as to better meet the needs of their students and community.

10. Graduate Studies in Counseling continued to seek improvements to better serve their students
while fulfilling their accreditation requirements (CACREP).

11. Survey data indicates that, although we are continuing to provide a quality product to our
community, we still have areas that need improvement such as graduate advising. Our

, 4


graduation rates remain very good but some programs obviously have considerable room for
improvement.

12. The Spiritual Transformation Inventory is one of the research components of the CCCU
Research Center in Adult Learning. The results indicate that we have a noticeable impact on
the spiritual lives of our students although there are several areas (g. and h.) where we could
improve.

13. Student Services has concentrated their program assessment efforts on Advising and
Chaplaincy programs since those are areas where surveys indicate a need for growth.

14. Off Campus Library Services (OCLS) has continued to seek ways to improve their operations.

15. Considering last year’s goals and conclusions of a review of our effectiveness operations, we
have developed the Institutional Effectiveness Goals for 2009-2010



Return to Table of Contents




Progress on Assessment Goals for 2008-09

The team of Dr. Harry Hall, Associate Dean for Institutional Effectiveness, Eve Grant, Assessment Specialist for
AGS, and Kim Harris, Assessment Assistant for AGS, dedicated their efforts toward improving the overall
effectiveness of the College of Adult and Professional Services and Indiana Wesleyan University. Dr. Cynthia
Tweedell (the outgoing Associate Dean) was instrumental in the progress in all areas. Here are the goals for 08-
09 with notes on the progress on each:

2008-2009 Goals Progress Continuing Actions
1. Implementation of a new software system, Implemented Class Began the process of converting all
Class Climate, to increase the timeliness Climate for selected program/course related surveys to
and efficiency of the End of Course and programs. Hired Class Climate. Goal for 09-10.
other survey processes. consultant for two day
workshops to refine
system.
2. Implementation of a new End of Course Reviewed all existing Goal for 09-10.
Survey after consulting with all surveys and student
departments regarding revisions to the learning outcomes (still
existing questions. under development)

Written for

Course

Document information

Uploaded on
May 9, 2024
Number of pages
161
Written in
2023/2024
Type
Class notes
Professor(s)
N/a
Contains
All classes

Subjects

$8.49
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
antonysila275

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
antonysila275 Chamberlain College Of Nursing
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
-
Member since
2 year
Number of followers
0
Documents
224
Last sold
-
LEARNING CENTRE.

EXAMS, SUMMARY , NOTES QUESTION AND ANSWERS.

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Trending documents

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions