100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
A grade 9 exemplar Inspector Calls essay answering the question, "How does Priestley use the character of The Inspector to suggest ways that society could be improved?" $7.22   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

A grade 9 exemplar Inspector Calls essay answering the question, "How does Priestley use the character of The Inspector to suggest ways that society could be improved?"

 22 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

This is a grade 9 essay that can be used as an example to aid GCSE revision of An Inspector Calls.

Preview 1 out of 2  pages

  • May 11, 2024
  • 2
  • 2021/2022
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
  • 200
avatar-seller
How does Priestley use the character of the inspector to suggest ways that society could
be improved?
In Priestley’s enigmatic morality play, “An Inspector Calls”, Priestley purposely depicts
society as stratified, unjust and ruled by exploitative capitalists such as the Birling family.
The Birlings are archetypal aristocrats who symbolise the many middle- and upper-class
people who chose to be ignorant to the suffering that their avaricious and dehumanising
views caused. Although set in 1912, the didactic play was written in 1945, arguably as a
piece of socialist propaganda to embrace the socialist views becoming more prevalent in
society in place of capitalism. The seemingly omniscient, righteous character Inspector
Goole is employed as a moral mouthpiece to encourage both the audience and characters
to improve their own societies as he coerces them towards accepting a sense of collective
responsibility.
The most fundamental character in the play is the Inspector who conceivably embodies the
socialist views of Priestley himself. Deliberately, Priestley uses the opening stage directions
to present the inspector as significant and enlightened. Structurally, the Introduction of the
Inspector is very significant. Mr Birling’s long-winded speech about how “a man has to…
look after himself” is cut short by “a sharp ring of a doorbell”: The Inspector’s arrival.
Clearly, this is used to convey the superiority of the Inspector and his ideas, and therefore
show the inferiority of the pompous Mr Birling – who embodies capitalism in the play. Upon
his arrival, the lighting changes from “pink and intimate… then brighter and harder” to
reflect how massively the Inspector’s suggestions will impact the family’s lives. Here, the
adjectives “pink and intimate” exude a warm atmosphere and covey the sheltered bliss that
the family’s wealth has allowed them to become accustomed to. Potentially, being bathed
in “pink” light is a reference to the idiom ‘rose tinted glasses’, implying that prior to the
Inspector’s arrival, the Birlings experienced a dreamy and idealistic view of the world.
Subsequently, the “brighter and harder” lighting has an accusatory feel, in direct contrast to
the previous description. This highlights the way that the Inspector’s interrogation will
challenge the Birling’s false reality. Arguably, Priestley uses precise stage directions create a
purposely unnerving undertone for the Birlings as he felt that society could be improved if
the affluent were unable to shirk their responsibilities any longer. A post war audience
would feel contented that this entitled bourgeois family’s behaviour is finally being brought
into question.

Throughout the play, the Inspector acts as Mr Birling’s literary foil; His mostly short, factual
statements directly contrast Mr Birling’s verbose orations. The inspector’s final speech at
the end of the play expresses that “we are all members of one body”, affirming that “we are
all responsible for one another”. With the collective pronoun, “we”, he implies that it is our
mutual duty to look out for “one another”. Furthermore, “members of one body” is a
biblical allusion makes the inspector seem morally enlightened so “we” as the audience are
inclined to agree with his suggestion of caring for one another to improve society. In 1912
there was no welfare state in Britain. The impoverished were often forced to depend on
charity, which was usually controlled by the wealthy. Priestley wanted to encourage people
to take the opportunity the end of the war had given them to rebuild a more caring,

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller emmayoung1810. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $7.22. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

81113 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling

Recently viewed by you


$7.22
  • (0)
  Add to cart