100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary Book 14. Smelik, Anneke. 2018. “Lara Croft, Kill Bill and Feminist Film Studies.” In Doing Gender in Media, Art and Culture $3.24   Add to cart

Summary

Summary Book 14. Smelik, Anneke. 2018. “Lara Croft, Kill Bill and Feminist Film Studies.” In Doing Gender in Media, Art and Culture

 190 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution
  • Book

Summary Book 14. Smelik, Anneke. 2018. “Lara Croft, Kill Bill and Feminist Film Studies.” In Doing Gender in Media, Art and Culture. for Introduction to Gender Studies at UU. (2018/2019).

Preview 1 out of 4  pages

  • Unknown
  • April 4, 2019
  • 4
  • 2018/2019
  • Summary
avatar-seller
Summary Book 14. Smelik, Anneke. 2018. “Lara Croft, Kill Bill and Feminist Film
Studies.” In Doing Gender in Media, Art and Culture.
Elena van Hattum

The first ​Tomb Raider ​film (2001) introduces Lara Croft (Angelina Jolie) as the girl that kicks
ass. The conflict is of minor importance (typical of Hollywood), the only important thing is that
it is between good and bad, and good will win. Lara is depicted as a true ‘warrior’, strong and
beautiful: the combination of strength and beauty has characterized film heroines since the
1990s. Traditionally, the hero was a man. In the 1980s the female heroine emerged, fighting
and swearing like a man. After this she became as erotically attractive as the early female
stars: eroticized as a woman, masculinized as action heroine. Lara Croft is an example of
this.

In the beginning of the twenty-first century there were two quite different tendencies in
contemporary visual culture, which Lara Croft from ​Tomb Raider ​and Beatrix Kiddo from the
Kill Bill f​ ilms embody: Lara can be analysed through classic feminist film theory, Beatrix
exceeds this. New cultural practices acquire new theoretical concepts.

Feminist theory has been an important factor in film studies. Feminist film theory developed
in the early 1970s (second wave) along with structuralism through the influence of semiotics
and psychoanalysis. Here it is not the content that matters (meaning), but how this meaning
was acquired. A film should not be regarded as a ​reflection ​of given meanings, but as a
construction o ​ f meaning: the process of signification was most important for analysing
gender in cinema. Recently a shift has been taking place towards the sensory and affective
experience ​of watching films.
The absorbing effect of film in film studies is explained with psychoanalysis. Fascination for
film is linked to sexuality: Sigmund Freud’s eroticism begins with looking (​scopophilia). ​The
viewer of a film is a voyeur. Watching films has been always something erotic, especially
cinema, in contrast to theater (no voyeurism: actors can look back). Laura Mulvey (1975)
advanced the idea that active and passive aspects of the urge to look are divided among the
sexes: just as John Berger said, men look and women are looked at. The camera films what
the man sees. The viewer is invited or forced to adopt a male position. The female character
is looked at in 3 ways: by the camera, the character and spectator. The whole cinematic
apparatus (camera, framing, editing, music) objectify the woman’s body and turn it into a
passive spectacle for the voyeuristic gaze. This voyeuristic gaze is unsettling for the man
because he is reminded that the woman is different (Freud: ‘castrated’, inferior). While film
has changed, the principle of the ‘male gaze’ is still very much the same. In cultural products
such as film the male fear of the female body has to be averted, this happens in 2 ways
according to Mulvey: 1. sadism: the woman’s body has to be controlled and inserted into
social order. (often violent) 2. fetishism: female is turned into an ideal beauty, a fetish, her
perfection turns the attention away from her difference. This is what happens to Hollywood
female stars.
-This analysis of the gaze is not only relevant to gender, but also for example race. The
Hollywood system is geared towards the white star. This consists of gendered AND racial
stereotyping. ‘The Other’ in films is nearly always linked to sexuality.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller elenavanhattum. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $3.24. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

75057 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$3.24
  • (0)
  Add to cart