100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary Arguinis et al. – Best-Practice Recommendations for Defining, Identifying, and Handling Outliers $3.78   Add to cart

Summary

Summary Arguinis et al. – Best-Practice Recommendations for Defining, Identifying, and Handling Outliers

 112 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Summary of artical by Arguinis et al. on defining, identifying and handling outliers.

Preview 1 out of 2  pages

  • April 5, 2019
  • 2
  • 2018/2019
  • Summary
avatar-seller
Arguinis et al. – Best-Practice Recommendations for Defining, Identifying, and
Handling Outliers

Outliers are data points that deviate markedly from others. They usually exert
disproportionate influence on substantive conclusions regarding relationships among
variables.
Researchers are faced with multiple (and often conflicting) definitions of outliers, techniques
to identify outliers, and suggestions on what to do with outliers once they are found.

Choices about outliers change substantive conclusions
Decisions on how to define, identify and handle outliers influence conclusions, including the
presence or absence, direction, and size of an effect or relationship.

First of all, the way in which outliers are identified is often inconsistent with how outliers are
defined.
The writers note that lack of transparency and incongruence in how outliers are defined,
identified, and handled are quite pervasive in articles published in some of the most
prestigious and influential journals.
Third, there is little discussion on the subject of studying outliers that are found to be
interesting and worthy of further examination. A pervasive view is that outliers among
substantive researchers is that outliers are problems that must be fixed, usually by
removing particular cases from the analyses.

Making decisions on how to define, identify, and handle outliers
The first principle is that choices and procedures regarding the treatment of outliers should
be described in detail to ensure transparency including a rationale for the particular
procedures that have been implemented. Second, researchers should clearly and explicitly
acknowledge the type of outlier in which they are interested, and then use an identification
technique that is congruent with the outlier definition.

The best practice recommendation is built around a sequence of steps:
1. Error outliers: the data point that lie at a distance from other data points because
they are the result of inaccuracies, they are nonlegitimate observations.
Using more than one technique is necessary to identify as many potential error
outliers as possible. It is then necessary to determine the cause of the identified
outlying observations. If caused by an error in recording, coding or data collection,
then an outlying observation is an error outlier. All remaining outlying data points
whose cause is unclear are treated as interesting outliers.
Once identified, the correct procedure is to either adjust the data points to their
correct values or remove such observations.
2. Interesting outliers: accurate data points that lie at a distance from other data points
and may contain valuable or unexpected knowledge.
The first step is to identify potential interesting outliers by using the same techniques
as identifying error outliers, and second to identify which are actually interesting.
Handling those outliers could be done by a quantitative approach, such as empirically
analyzing differences between the manufacturing synergies of high and low outlier
performers. Also qualitative approaches can be used.
3. Influential outliers: accurate data points that lie at a distance from other data points,
are not error or interesting, and also affect substantive conclusions. There are two
types of influential outliers, namely model fit outliers (data points whose presence
alters the fit of a model) and prediction outliers (data points whose presence alters
parameter estimates.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller lindawijnhoven. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $3.78. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

64438 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$3.78
  • (0)
  Add to cart