100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
ethical issues in social and cognitive psychology (12) evaluation essay $3.99
Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. PEARSON (PEARSON)
  4.  
  5. Psychology 2015
  6.  
  7. Unit 9 - Psychological skills

Exam (elaborations)

ethical issues in social and cognitive psychology (12) evaluation essay
 0 purchase
  • Course
  • Unit 9 - Psychological skills
  • Institution
  • PEARSON (PEARSON)

essay on 12 marker assessing ethical issues in social and cognitive psychology, covering issues and debates. 2 PEEL paragraphs and a conclusion for top band marks

Preview 1 out of 2  pages

Document information

  • May 15, 2024
  • 2
  • 2023/2024
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers

Subjects

  • ethical issues
  • issues and debates
  • social
  • cognitive
  • essay
  • assessing
  • how far
  • 12 marker

Written for

  • A/AS Level
  • PEARSON (PEARSON)
  • Psychology 2015
  • Unit 9 - Psychological skills
All documents for this subject (44)

Seller

avatar-seller
erikakumar

Reviews received

Content preview

Assess how far research from social and cognitive psychology
could be considered ethical. (8 marks)
Research from social and cognitive psychology could be considered ethical
to some extent by maintaining the autonomy of the participants. Autonomy is
the ability of the participants to make their own decisions. The researcher
must respect their decisions and should not manipulate or persuade them
through payment. Sherif et al. (1954/1961) investigated intergroup conflict in
22 11-year old boys from America. Although the field experiment may have
been unethical by deliberately creating opportunities for conflict between
the boys, they had the right to withdraw. In fact, 2 of them went home in the
first week due to home sickness. Similarly, Loftus and Palmer (1974)
investigated reconstructive memory in students by using leading questions.
The participants had the right to withdraw and informed consent. This shows
that research into social and cognitive psychology maintains the
participants’ autonomy by allowing them to leave the study and withdraw
their data at any time. This is a strength as this means that this research is
ethical to some extent. On the other hand, this research may not respect the
integrity and dignity of the participants. This is because some research such
as Milgram’s (1963) does not obtain informed consent from the participants
since they were not aware of the true aims of the study. For example, the
participants were told that this study was about memory and learning and
not about obedience. This means that the participants were not able to give
informed consent because they were not aware of everything that was
going on in the study. They were deceived about the electric shocks not
being real. Similarly, case studies in cognitive psychology may be argued to
fail to respect the subjects’ integrity and autonomy. For example, HM might
not have been medically competent to give consent due to his brain
damage. This implies that research into social and cognitive psychology may
not always meet all the ethical principles of integrity and autonomy.
Research from social and cognitive psychology could not be considered
very ethical due to the potential for harm to the participants. Researchers
should consider the different risks a participant may be exposed to, since not
only does the procedures of the study may create physical or psychological
risks, but also the result of publishing data which may involve social risks to the
participant and the groups they represent. Sherif et al. might have exposed
the boys to psychological harm due to the events rigged by the researchers
which created opportunities for intergroup conflicts. There were food fights,
theft and raid skirmishes which might have psychologically harmed the boys.
Similarly, Loftus and Palmer (1974) have exposed participants to film clips of
car crashes which may have distressed them possibly due to previous

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller erikakumar. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $3.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

70713 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 15 years now

Start selling
$3.99
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added