100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Notes from the Second Part of English Language Pragmatics $7.49
Add to cart

Class notes

Notes from the Second Part of English Language Pragmatics

 34 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Notes corresponding to topics 3 and 4 of Pragmatics, for the second part. With original and uncopied examples from the teacher, which she demands and seeks.

Preview 2 out of 11  pages

  • May 21, 2024
  • 11
  • 2023/2024
  • Class notes
  • Masusi
  • Las clases correspondientes a la unidad 3 y 4
avatar-seller
UNIT 3: CONVERSATION ANALYSIS

Main Topics

1. Ordinary language philosophy: H.P. Grice
2. Implicature
3. The Cooperative Principle and its maxims of conversation
4. Non-observance of the maxims
5. Final remarks
1. ORDINARY LANGUAGE PHILOSOPHY: H.P. GRICE

Grice worked with Austin at Oxford in the 1940s and 1950s. Ordinary language
philosophers: fathers of pragmatics. They developed works against positivism. Grice never
developed his theory completely, but it is one of the most influential.

Austin: distinction between what speakers say and what they mean (indirectness).

Grice wished to explain how, with shared rules or conventions, language users understand
one another. Bridging the gap between what is expressed and what is implied.

2. IMPLICATURE

Grice: distinction between natural meaning (literal or abstract meaning) and non-natural
meaning (implied or speaker meaning). Implicature is the process of what is said to what is
implied. Two types of implicature:

● Conventional implicature: Generated by the conventional meaning of the words or
expressions used. She is fat but beautiful. Pragmatic presupposition
● Conversational implicature: They are inferred from conversational rules. Not about
something that is said. I have three books. The hearer knows that the speaker does
not have four books.
○ Generalized conversational implicatures: Triggered without the need for a
special context
○ Particularized conversational implicatures: Only triggered in a certain
context.

Grice listed some distinctive properties of conversational implicatures:

- Non-detachability/non-conventionality: a: I love Tom and Penny, they are delightful!.
b: Well, I Penny is delightful, yes. Even if the sentence is rephrased, (Penny is
amazing) the implicature cannot be detached from the utterance.

, - Implicature changes. How much do you make? If the context is changed, the
implicature changes. For example if someone is asking that before getting engaged
- Calculability: We can calculate how to generate an implicature, following some steps
- Cancelability/Defeasibility: Implicatures can be canceled, as they are not said
explicitly. For example, speaker b can say that they don’t dislike Jane, but they
merely do not know her enough.

Inferential meanings may sometimes become:

1. Conventionalized. Accepted way of expressing indirect meaning, for example:

a. Do you think Mark is gay?
b. Is the sky blue? (the answer is obvious, yes)

There are strategies for these expressions. This one is answering a ridiculous question with
another more ridiculous question. This is to show that the answer is self-evident.

a. I have won the lottery!
b. Yes, and I'm Alexander the Great! (I don’t believe a word you say)

This strategy is replying to an interlocutor’s lie with a more exaggerated and ridiculous lie to
show that you are not fooled.

a. Paul is very nice, right?
b. If Paul is nice, then Hell has frozen over (not agreeing with the proposition, no)

This strategy is replying with the formula “If x, then y: not x” to show disagreement

This can go to the point that the indirect meaning becomes ingrained in the grammar of the
language, the indirect meaning coexists or even replaces the direct meaning. This is:

2. Grammaticalization: Going beyond conventionalization because inference is no longer
involved. It cannot be changed. What was an indirect meaning is now a direct meaning:

● you know (manipulative a lil, to explain that they share common ground)
● I mean (adding more info to justify)
● See (to make the hearer agree)




3. THE COOPERATIVE PRINCIPLE AND ITS MAXIMS OF CONVERSATION

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller ullstudent. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $7.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

53022 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$7.49
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added