Exam (elaborations)
IRM1501 MAY JUNE 2024 PORTFOLIO (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 1 2024 - DUE 27 May 2024
- Course
- Institution
- Book
IRM1501 MAY JUNE 2024 PORTFOLIO (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 1 2024 - DUE 27 May 2024
[Show more]
Connected book
Book Title:
Author(s):
- Edition:
- ISBN:
- Edition:
More summaries for
-
Exam (elaborations) IRM1501 MAY JUNE 2024 PORTFOLIO (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 1 2024 - DUE 27 May 2024 • Course • Introduction to Research Methodology for Law (IRM1501) • Institution • Unive...
-
Exam (elaborations) IRM1501 MAY JUNE 2024 PORTFOLIO (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 1 2024 - DUE 27 May 2024 • Course • Introduction to Research Methodology for Law (IRM1501) • Institution • Unive...
-
Exam (elaborations) IRM1501 MAY JUNE 2024 PORTFOLIO (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 1 2024 - DUE 27 May 2024 • Course • Introduction to Research Methodology for Law (IRM1501) • Institution • Unive...
Seller
Follow
bsenedict
Reviews received
Content preview
IRM1501 MAY JUNE 2024PORTFOLIO (COMPLETE ANSWERS)
Semester 1 2024 – DUE 27 May 2024
100% TRUSTED workings, explanations and solutions.
QUESTION 1
The Constitutional Court of South Africa in the case of Sidumo v Rustenburg
Platinum Mines Ltd & Others 2007 12 BLLR 1097 (CC) devised a new test to be
applied when determining the fairness of the dismissal. Discuss the case of
Sidumo in the prescribed format (facts, legal question, reasons for the decision or
ratio decidendi and the findings of the case) and highlight the test that the
Constitutional Court designed in deciding on fairness in labour law matters. (15
Marks)
Sidumo v Rustenburg Platinum Mines Ltd & Others 2007 12 BLLR 1097 (CC)
Facts:
Sidumo was a security guard employed by Rustenburg Platinum Mines. His duties
included searching employees to prevent theft. During a search, Sidumo failed to follow
proper procedures, which resulted in the loss of a significant amount of platinum.
Consequently, he was dismissed for negligence. Sidumo challenged the fairness of his
dismissal, and the matter was eventually taken to the Constitutional Court of South Africa.
Legal Question:
The key legal question was whether the dismissal of Sidumo for negligence was fair, and
more broadly, what the appropriate test for fairness in dismissals should be according to
South African labour law.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller bsenedict. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $4.55. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
64438 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now