100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
PoD Lecture Notes & Readings Summary, Exam Study Guide $9.83   Add to cart

Summary

PoD Lecture Notes & Readings Summary, Exam Study Guide

 13 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

My Politics of Difference final exam study guide. I used these notes to get a 7.9 on the exam just by reading and re-reading them. Honestly, the exam is pretty easy if you just take in the information on the study guide. It had all the information I needed. The study guide is detailed eno...

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 17  pages

  • May 23, 2024
  • 17
  • 2022/2023
  • Summary
avatar-seller
Politics of Difference Notes

Lecture 1: Introduction

Politics of difference: how power and political institutions categorize people into groups
and how this generates inequality systematically

Which differences are political?
- Depends on what normal is, never has to be justified
- Difference is protected in private sphere
- Public sphere should be neutral (often close to dominant form) and
non-discriminating

Is it possible to define neutrality?
- Positionality matters
- Describing difference is political, but not all differences are political
- Interested in how and why some become and remain political
- Defining what is “normal” and what is “different” is political
- Critical theorists question possibility of a neutral public space
- Political scientists study differences between interests and identities


Lecture 2: The Public Sphere

Public sphere: a communicative realm to discuss and debate common interests of
government where “force of better argument” (rational) wins and coercion is absent
- Participants leave their status and identities behind
- Physical sites where the public is brought into discussion, communication does
not have to be live and can be mediated
- Public sphere has grown from serving the wealthy to including more
classes, workers, and women
- Who has a voice is continually contested
- Groups unable to participate in decisions made in the public sphere; who is
part of “the common”?
- Realm exists where we can make decisions without force, moral
argument is shown through nonviolence

, Veil of ignorance: hypothetical state in which decisions about social justice and the
allocation of resources would be made fairly, as if by a person who must decide on
society’s rules and economic structures without knowing what position they will occupy
in that society

How can we make fair rules?
- All theory is for someone and some purpose
- Positionally matters in how we view ideas as legitimate, such as method,
gender, race/ethnicity, nationality/class, language
- Ways of asking questions is perspective
- All knowledge is influenced by who we are, knowledge is relative
- Academia is a particular type of public sphere

Bennet & Livingston:
- Capture and erosion of liberal governing institutions by wealthy interests and
aligned political elites who are unable to sell their actual agendas to the public
without increasing levels of disinformation
- Creating mistruths increased rapidly; with disinformation, the ability to
come to agreements is abysmal
- Three arguments about disinformation:
1. Confirmation bias: set of assumptions/convictions
- Leads us to discount validity of conflicting ideas and search for ideas
to conform
2. Erosion of liberal institutions: lack of trust in leaders, declining faith in
institutions to distinguish fact and put forward arguments for the common
interest
3. State interference
- Result of decades of corrosive political and economic pressure that has eroded
public confidence in institutions and citizens in search of emotionally affirming
facts (confirmation bias)

Young:
- When we conceive of the public sphere as neutral, we have certain assumptions
- Practical speech devalued in public sphere
- Emphasis on particular framework of logic, downplaying arguments that are
maybe more powerful but don’t follow a logical sequence

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Sh3ldonCoop3r. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $9.83. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67474 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$9.83
  • (0)
  Add to cart