100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary The Handmaid's Tale - analysis $8.10   Add to cart

Summary

Summary The Handmaid's Tale - analysis

 17 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Notes from a series of Massolit lectures about different aspects of the novel, contexts and some close analysis

Preview 2 out of 7  pages

  • June 4, 2024
  • 7
  • 2023/2024
  • Summary
avatar-seller
THT

Contexts

- Published in 1985 – instantly caused a stir
 Banned reading in some US high schools
- Written when she was living close to a totalitarian regime
- Novel that recalls elements of nazi German and totalitarian regimes
- Emphasis on surveillance and terror
- Gilead is a theocracy – takes us back to the founding fathers of America and religious ideology
characterizing the 17th century puritan England
 Handmaid’s red robes – 1850 novel the scarlet letter
- Set in new England – asked to make direct connection to puritan founding fathers and kind of
theocratic regime we see in THT
- Choses to set it in the US – able to see the heritage of extreme political thought she does not detect in
liberal Canada
 Canada is not blame free – historical notes
o Professor says Canada is very happy to send back refugees from Gilead
- Liberal tolerance and appeasement – can become cowardice
- America founded on religious extremism
- Writing from position of berlin – gave her some distance
 Could reflect on what she was seeing in America at the time
- 1980’s – resurgence known as the new right
 Shouted about traditional values – suggested women having careers was a terrible thing,
emasculated men
 Responsible for fire bombings on abortionist clinics
- Current of new right political thinking transferred straight into THT
 Serena joy had a previous career – signer on a television evangelical show
- Everything connects together – results in a situation like Gilead
- Recalling texts such as 1984 (George Orwell) Brave New World (Huxley)
 Classical dystopian texts / critical dystopia
o Emphasis on eyes and surveillance
- Atwood refers to THT as speculative fiction
 Nothing is made up – she’s taken elements from various ideologies
 There is nothing in the novel that hasn’t already happened
- Referring it as a critical dystopia – removes texts and Gilead from our own contexts
 Atwood wants us to think what in Gilead do we recognise – should these things worry us?
- Attitudes towards gender role play – look at our society and think are we really so different?
 In our society there are common factors although not so extreme
- Novel that makes us reflect on our own context
- As speculative fiction – it is a warning
 Atwood – anything could happen anywhere, given the circumstances

Structure and beginnings

- Various pieces written in an order to release a certain kind of energy
- Handmaid – archaic term
 Not something we associate with our own context – makes us think it cannot be set in our own
society
- Historical notes – told that the title is partly in homage to Chaucer
 Tale carries further connotations – American idiom for bottom
o Sexualisation of Offred that is embedded in that title
 Diminished further by other implications – tale tends to suggest like old wives tale
o Some kind of fable – something fantastical and to not quite be believed

, - Offred’s narrative – named after a male narrative
 As if to give it credentials that it would otherwise lack
- Epigraphs – quote from the bible, proverb and epigraph from Jonathon swift
 All male narratives
 Historical notes – delivered in voices of male academics
- Offred’s narrative is sandwiched between competing male narratives
 As if her narrative is being contained in some way – implication of a metaphor of imprisonment
o Offred is a political prisoner is Gilead – argue her narrative is imprisoned
- Offred records her story on two cassette tapes
- Chapter headings – combination of familiar terms that we recognize in our world and context and
unfamiliar terms
 Unfamiliar terms – frightening
- Disturbing future tense narrative
- Offred’s life contained and circumscribed – she is often visible
 When she is visible she must act/behave/speak in a certain kind of way to stay safe in Gilead
- Regular occurrence of word night in chapter headings – Offred alone in her room
 Thinking, taking trips back in the past, into her memory, speaking, observing everything around
her during the day in Gilead
 Night sections puncture the text
 Where most of the narrative work is done – Offred has the space and time to tell her story
 Create a dominant sense throughout the text – connection with diary of Anne frank
- Beginning voice – feels intimate
- Whole narrative is a first person narrative – sense of an intimate conversation with the reader
 Sense of a confession
- Interplay between words formerly and now
- Whole space is like a palimpsest – literary term for a piece of old writing that has been roughly
scrubbed out and new writing has been written over the top
 Meaning produced from an intersection between the two
- Speak of coercion, imprisonment and fear – restrictions on everyone
 Everyone has clearly circumscribed roles
- Infantilization – treated like children and not allowed to do anything
- Emphasis on surveillance and silence
- Emphasis on names important – assume that her name is June
 Comes last in list
 Only name in the list that does not appear elsewhere
- What has happened to the familiar? – question that projects us through the rest of the narrative

Narration

- Historical notes – Offred’s story found on cassette tapes
 Spoken account and they have written it down
- Oral text latterly written down
- Historians aren’t sure they have the story in the right order
- All of it is a reconstruction – word reconstruction repeated four times in section
 Impossible to put everything in to any story – too many parts, sides, nuances
 So much is ambiguous – essentially ambiguity around any narration
 Makes us think of fabrication – element of fabrication in any story that is told
- Her story – an element of evert single story that is told
- Offred does not do what is expected – talks about element of fabrication
 Chosen to put in a certain element of making things up – I made that up. It didn’t happen that
way … I am not sure how it happened
o Paradoxical – should be to make us trust her narrative less
o Fact she's telling us that increases the credibility of her narration over all

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller clempitrat. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $8.10. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

79789 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$8.10
  • (0)
  Add to cart