100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Equity $20.33   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

Equity

4 reviews
 189 views  12 purchases
  • Course
  • Institution

Nicely presented and easy to follow. Topics include: Creation of Gifts and Trusts, Transfer of Equitable Interests, Certainties (Object, Intention, Subject Matter), Beneficiary Principle, Implied Trusts (Resulting and Constructive), Running of Trusts, Breach of Fiduciary Duties, Breach of Trustee D...

[Show more]

Preview 1 out of 27  pages

  • June 18, 2019
  • 27
  • 2018/2019
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Unknown

4  reviews

review-writer-avatar

By: danielbuckley • 2 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: vijayakhaitan • 4 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: gabriellamccarthy1773 • 4 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: sehar2014 • 5 year ago

avatar-seller
EQUITY & TRUSTS REVISION

CREATION OF GIFTS AND TRUSTS

IDENTIFICATION OF ISSUE
*Start by explaining that the question is concerned with the validity of gifts and trusts
MENTAL CAPACITY
 To give a gift the donor must be able to understand the nature of the transaction and its consequences.
 There is a presumption and on evidence that is has not been rebutted
 Re Beaney (In relation to Gifts) - Higher degree of understanding - for higher value of gift.
3 CERTAINTIES
LJ Turner in Milroy v Lord recognised 3 methods of giving property away:
o Outright gift to the donee
o Transfer to trustees to hold on trust for the person to be benefitted; or
o Declaration of self as trustee for the person to be benefitted

In order for a gift or trust (Knight v Knight) to be valid, it must comply with the 3 certainties: intention, subject and object, beneficiary principle
and rules against perpetuity.
INTENTION
*Is this a gift or is this a trust? – ‘2,000 to my friend, Gary Smith in the hope he will spend a good proportion of it on his two children, Any and Jodie’
GIFT TRANSER TO TRUSTEE DECLARATION OF HOLDING AS
TRUSTEE
The intention of the transferor at the time of Certainty of words - it is necessary to examine the words used by the owner. The settlor
the transfer of the property is crucial. must demonstrate an intention to impose an obligation upon the trustee. Also, it is not SAME AS TRANSFER TO TRUSTEE
 This can usually be inferred from the necessary for settlors to use a particular form of words to create a trust. ‘Equity looks to
circumstances (no need for express intent rather than form’. ‘To hold for someone…’
words- e.g. Christmas day/ birthday/  Paul v Constance - Statements such as ‘the money is as much yours as mine’ as well
special occasion) as conduct will be sufficient to demonstrate certainty of intention with regards to
 (Re Beaney)- ‘I give/ I am giving’ creation of trust= The word ‘TRUST’ does not have to be used
example  Re Adams and Kensington Vestry - Precatory words will not suffice to demonstrate
 This is the easiest method to transfer certainty of intention. ‘In full confidence/ hoping that/believing that/expecting that/ I
absolute ownership- rarely an issue if know that/I would like/in the hope that’- they must be imperative words not
intention with gifts in wills precatory (falls short of legal obligation, precatory words convey moral obligation=
in this case it would be an outright gift)
SUBJECT MATTER

GIFT TRANSFER TO TRUSTEE DECLARATION OF
HOLDING AS TRUSTEE
The subject matter of the gift must be First when creating the trust, the settlor or testator must identify the trust property clearly (what
certain. The wording must be certain. property the trust is over, or trust fails)  e.g. state the name of company/ shares (specificity is key)  What does ‘good
 ‘My best shares/ 100 of my CASE EXAMPLES proportion’ mean?
shares out of 200’- not certain Palmer v Where the court cannot be sure which parts of the residue are meant to be held
 ‘The best of’ is not a certain Simmonds on trust, the trust will fail; terms such as ‘bulk’ are too uncertain for the court to
concept determine what was meant.
 Palmer v Simmonds: court Re London For a trust to be validly constituted, there must be certainty of subject matter -
rejected a gift of ‘bulk of my Wine where the trust property cannot be differentiated from other property, the trust
residuary estate’ due to Company will fail The buyers of wine stored in a warehouse but not segregated from the
uncertainty (Shippers) Ltd general stock of wine could not establish a trust as the subject matter was too
uncertain.
Hunter v Moss Where the trust concerns intangible and identical property (such as shares), the SAME AS TRANSFER TO
(shares) settlor does not need to stipulate which of these will constitute the subject matter TRUSTEE
of the trust- they just need to be the same type (all carrying the same voting
If subject matter is an issue: ‘one of rights) if some shares from a larger number (10,000 out of 20,000) if is not
several clocks’- not clear which clock necessary to have distinguished the particular 10,000 shares, assuming all the
this is  if fails will pass on residue to 20,000 are identical
other person or charity. Re Lewis’s of Robert Walker J held that the traders were able to recover the money held in the
 Would have been clearer to let Leicester bank account because there was a valid trust for them. The subject matter was
object choose clocks or specify a certain because by placing the money in a separate account, it had been
particular clock in the will segregated from Lewis’s other money.
Mac-Jordan Trust of retained money not accomplished because there was uncertainty of
‘Rest of my estate’ – is clear as it Construction subject matter. The retention monies had not been segregated from Brook mount
means everything not otherwise Ltd other funds.
specifically given to others Re Golay The subject matter of a trust will be certain if the settlor gives a workable formula
for calculating income- ‘A reasonable income’ where someone had previously
been getting a steady income was sufficiently certain – position may be different
for capital however (not clear enough)

Nature of beneficial interests:

Vested - unconditional Contingent - conditional: You will not get it if not met.

*These terms describe whether someone will benefit- this can change over time upon someone meeting a condition

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller thomas288. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $20.33. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

62890 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$20.33  12x  sold
  • (4)
  Add to cart