100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Misrepresentation $4.52
Add to cart

Study guide

Misrepresentation

 48 views  2 purchases
  • Course
  • Institution

Comprehensive textbook, lecture and academic notes on Misrepresentation in English Contract Law. Includes key cases, analysis of the law, academic criticism and my own comments. Got me a 1st

Preview 1 out of 11  pages

  • June 21, 2019
  • 11
  • 2018/2019
  • Study guide
avatar-seller
5 – MISREPRESENTATION
Contract law does not have specific principle requiring disclosure, but there are certain cases where it is
needed. Where there is misrepresentation, non-disclosure or mistake, the possible responses are:
1. The contract is void ab initio
2. The contract is voidable via rescission
3. The contract can be rectified to correct the mistake (see previous supervisions)
4. Damages can be awarded to remedy the wrong

Where the issue is a statement made in course of negotiations, the remedy will depend on classification
of the statement:
1. Contractual term (a ‘warranty’) – damages for breach of contract, possibly termination for
breach (depending on nature of term)
2. Misrepresentation – rescission (subject to bars), and potential tort or Misrepresentation Act
1967 damages

At one point, misrepresentation could be ground for rescission and damages were available only
under the tort of deceit if there was fraud; no damages for innocent misrep. In Hedley Byrne v
Heller (1964), HOL made clear breach of the DOC to avoid negligent misstatement could give rise
to damages. 1967 Misrepresentation Act extended damages under s 2(1) to the case of
misrepresentation inducing a contract where the representor cannot prove absence of
negligence or bad faith. This made inference of collateral contract less necessary, although still
necessary because representations as to future are harder to fit in scope of Act.

Categorising statements made in negotiations
Mere puffs
These have no legal effect, they mean nothing
- Dimmock v Hallett (1866) (auctioneer claim that land ‘fertile and improvable = puff)
- Cf. Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co (1893) (CBS tried to claim promise puffery; Bowen said
extravagant promise was with aim to profit, should be bound)

Contractual Terms (warranties)
The test is whether parties objectively intended it to be a term (see identification of terms – S3)
- Heilbut, Symons & Co v Buckleton (1913) (Moulton: question is whether there is “evidence of an
intention by one or both parties that there should be contractual liability in respect of the
accuracy of the statement”)

A misrepresentation can be a contractual term, but does not need to be to ground a misrep claim. See
statute about implied terms under CRA and SGA (see S3), esp CRA 2015.

Misrepresentations
A material false representation of fact or law, addressed to the claimant, which induced C’s entry into
the contract.
- Pankhania v Hackney LBC (2002) (Confirms false statements of law can be misrep)

A statement of fact is required for misrepresentation; this must be objectively decided (would
reasonable person think the representor asserting a fact?)

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller edwardasmith. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $4.52. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

52510 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$4.52  2x  sold
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added