Deze samenvatting omvat zowel lesnotities als aanvullingen uit het handboek. Het is een volledige samenvatting met duidelijke uitleg een aanduiding waar belangrijke delen worden besproken.
Hoofdstuk 1: Wat is rechtssociologie........................................................................................................................................ 8
Afdeling 1: inleiding.........................................................................................................................................................................8
§1 Sociaalwet. Disciplines zijn ‘academische studies’.................................................................................................................8
§2 Maatschappelijke ontwikkelingen en recht...........................................................................................................................9
§3 Professionele ontwikkelingen.................................................................................................................................................9
§4 Rechtspraktijk.........................................................................................................................................................................9
4.1. Advocaat..........................................................................................................................................................................9
4.2. Sociale advocatuur...........................................................................................................................................................9
4.3. Rechter.............................................................................................................................................................................9
4.4. Ambtenaar justitieel beleid.............................................................................................................................................9
4.5. Bedrijfsjurist...................................................................................................................................................................10
4.6. Wetgever.......................................................................................................................................................................10
Afdeling 2: Het belang van sociologie voor de beoefening van het recht – Koen Raes.................................................................10
§1 De pleinvrees van juristen....................................................................................................................................................10
§2 “Sire, il n’y a plus d’intellectuels”.........................................................................................................................................10
§3 Rechtenstudenten zijn niet allen studenten in het recht.....................................................................................................10
3.1. R. DAHRENDORF, “The education of an elite: Law faculties and the German upper class”.........................................10
3.2. Toepassing v analyse.....................................................................................................................................................11
§4 de rechtenstudie als beroepsopleiding & juristen en sociologen........................................................................................11
§5 juristen en sociologen...........................................................................................................................................................11
5.1. 18e eeuw........................................................................................................................................................................11
5.2. tweede helft 19e eeuw..................................................................................................................................................11
5.3. rond 1900.......................................................................................................................................................................11
5.4. einde 19e eeuw/begin 20ste eeuw..................................................................................................................................11
5.5. rond 1950.......................................................................................................................................................................11
§6 sociologisch anti-instrumentalisme – rechtssociologisch benadering.................................................................................12
6.1. sociologische evaluatie van de wetgeving.....................................................................................................................12
6.2. voorwaarden voor doorwerking van rechtsnorm in de praktijk...................................................................................12
6.3. sociologische mobiliseringstheorieën...........................................................................................................................12
6.4. sociologische handhavingstheorieën............................................................................................................................12
6.5. conclusie bij mobiliserings- en handhavingstheorieën.................................................................................................13
§7 de marginaliteit van de (rechts)sociologie...........................................................................................................................13
§8 wie de ethiek codificeert, maakt er recht van......................................................................................................................13
§9 een geactualiseerde rechtstatelijke theorie.........................................................................................................................13
§10 voor een consequente scheiding van academische en politieke macht............................................................................13
Afdeling 3: over (rechts)sociologie – Jean van Houtte...................................................................................................................13
Afdeling 4: een rechtssociologische analyse vd juridisering vd samenleving................................................................................13
§0 inleiding................................................................................................................................................................................13
§1 omschrijving juridisering......................................................................................................................................................13
1.1.einde 19e eeuw, maar vooral vanaf WOII.......................................................................................................................13
1.2.definitie...........................................................................................................................................................................14
1.3.domeinen van het maatschappelijk leven......................................................................................................................14
1.4.geografisch......................................................................................................................................................................14
1.5. onderwijscontext...........................................................................................................................................................15
§2 clusters van determinanten..................................................................................................................................................15
1
Charlotte Zegers
, §3 dieperliggende oorzaak........................................................................................................................................................15
§4 negatieve gevolgen...............................................................................................................................................................15
§5 positieve gevolgen................................................................................................................................................................15
§6 leven met de juridisering......................................................................................................................................................16
§7 uitbreiding rechtsinstrumentalisme.....................................................................................................................................16
7.1. achtergronden...............................................................................................................................................................16
7.2. kenmerken.....................................................................................................................................................................16
7.3. impliciete premissen......................................................................................................................................................16
7.3.1. concreet.................................................................................................................................................................16
7.4. kritiek.............................................................................................................................................................................17
7.4.1. algemeen................................................................................................................................................................17
7.4.2.commentaar op kenmerken...................................................................................................................................17
7.4.3. ontkrachting vd impliciete kenmerken/premissen................................................................................................17
7.4.4. conclusie................................................................................................................................................................17
7.5. alternatief: de sociale werking van regels.....................................................................................................................17
7.5.1. inleiding..................................................................................................................................................................17
7.5.2. semi-autonome sociale veld..................................................................................................................................18
7.5.3. voorbeelden...........................................................................................................................................................18
7.6. conclusie........................................................................................................................................................................19
Hoofdstuk 2: regelgeving....................................................................................................................................................... 19
Afdeling 1: inleiding.......................................................................................................................................................................19
§1 het thema ‘wetgeving’..........................................................................................................................................................19
1.1.… in het recht/de rechtenstudie.....................................................................................................................................19
1.2. … in rechtssociologisch onderzoek................................................................................................................................19
§2 Eerste rechtssociologisch onderzoek over wetgeving.........................................................................................................19
§3 latere rechtssociologiche perspectieven..............................................................................................................................19
3.1.Kritiek op wetgevingstsunami vanaf 1980......................................................................................................................19
3.2.Theorie van sociale werking...........................................................................................................................................19
3.3.Expressieve en communicatieve functie van het recht..................................................................................................20
3.3.1. Expressieve functie................................................................................................................................................20
3.3.2. Communicatieve functie........................................................................................................................................20
3.4. legitimiteit......................................................................................................................................................................20
§4 pragmatische benaderingen.................................................................................................................................................20
§5 uitdagingen vd toekomst......................................................................................................................................................21
Afdeling 2: deregulering als maatschappijvorming: rechtssoc probleemstelling – HUYSE...........................................................21
§1 vragen bij het debat..............................................................................................................................................................21
1.1.‘Multiplication abracabte des lois?’................................................................................................................................21
1.2.Overregulering?..............................................................................................................................................................21
1.3. deregulering: hoe?.........................................................................................................................................................22
§2 de maatschappelijke probleemstelling gepreciseerd...........................................................................................................22
§3 Regulering en de instrumentalisering van het recht............................................................................................................23
3.1.Types van recht, types van regulering............................................................................................................................23
3.1.1.Historische achtergrond/duiding:...........................................................................................................................23
§4 Deregulering: de grenzen en de risico’s...............................................................................................................................24
Afdeling 3 ‘From vision to reality: ex post evaluation of legislation – VAN AEKEN.......................................................................24
§1 inleiding................................................................................................................................................................................24
§2 waarom wetsevaluatie?.......................................................................................................................................................24
2.1. Paradox..........................................................................................................................................................................24
2.2. inspiratie bij Popper.......................................................................................................................................................24
§3 wat is wetsevaluatie?...........................................................................................................................................................24
3.1. criteria............................................................................................................................................................................25
3.2. types...............................................................................................................................................................................25
3.3.algemene criteria............................................................................................................................................................25
3.4 terminologie....................................................................................................................................................................25
3.4.1. effectiviteit.............................................................................................................................................................25
3.4.2. doelbereiking.........................................................................................................................................................25
2
Charlotte Zegers
, 3.4.3. efficiëntie...............................................................................................................................................................25
§4 institutionalisering................................................................................................................................................................26
§5 België en Vlaanderen............................................................................................................................................................26
5.1. federaal..........................................................................................................................................................................26
5.1.1. . Raad van State, afdeling wetgeving.....................................................................................................................26
5.1.2. RIA..........................................................................................................................................................................26
5.1.3. parlementair comité belast met d wetsevaluatie..................................................................................................26
5.2. vlaanderen.....................................................................................................................................................................27
5.2.1. RIA-advies...............................................................................................................................................................27
5.2.2. RIE..........................................................................................................................................................................27
§6 conclusie...............................................................................................................................................................................27
§7 vb v wetsevaluatie – (in)effectiviteit....................................................................................................................................27
7.1. vb v wetsevaluatie – (in)effectiviteit.............................................................................................................................27
7.1.1. Tijdelijke arbeidscontracten (NL)...........................................................................................................................27
7.1.2. De wet van 18 juli 1990 tot wijziging van hoofdstuk vijf van de wetbetreffende de politie over het wegverkeer
werd ingevoerd in België.................................................................................................................................................27
7.2. vb v wetsevaluatie – (in)effectiviteit en neveneffecten................................................................................................28
7.2.1. invoering helmplicht voor bromfietsen (NL).........................................................................................................28
7.3. vb v wetsevaluatie – onvoorziene neveneffecten.........................................................................................................28
7.3.1. Subsidiëren van zonnepanelen..............................................................................................................................28
Hoofdstuk 3: formele conflictbeslechting............................................................................................................................... 28
Afdeling 1: inleiding.......................................................................................................................................................................28
Afdeling 2: straffen tussen rede en gevoel.....................................................................................................................................28
§1 inleiding................................................................................................................................................................................28
§2 opbouw.................................................................................................................................................................................28
§3 straffen is meer dan het bestrijden van criminaliteit...........................................................................................................29
3.1. Garland - punishment and modern society (1990).......................................................................................................29
3.2. Straffen hebben een symbolische, morele en politieke betekenis...............................................................................29
3.3. penaliteit als emotioneel geladen conflictueus instituut..............................................................................................29
3.4. bestraffing als onderdrukkende en uitsluitende praktijk..............................................................................................29
3.4.1. Marxistische hoek..................................................................................................................................................30
3.4.2. Foucault..................................................................................................................................................................30
3.4.3. Bentham.................................................................................................................................................................30
3.5. gevangenissttraf is een geciviliseerde straf...................................................................................................................30
3.6. punitiviteit en emotie Vs. Rationaliteit en rede............................................................................................................30
§4 de straftoemeting als betekenende sociale praktijk............................................................................................................30
4.1. visies op straf (en dader)...............................................................................................................................................30
4.2. visies op (straf en) dader...............................................................................................................................................30
4.3. straftoemetingsonderzoek en belang van interpretatie van tegenstrijdigheden.........................................................31
4.3.1. conclusie: straftoemeting bepaald door:...............................................................................................................31
4.4. de rechter tss rede en gevoel........................................................................................................................................31
4.5. over ongelijkheden, stuurbaarheid en rationaliseerbaarheid van de straftoemeting..................................................31
4.5.1. traftoemetingsproces heeft nood aan transparantie............................................................................................31
§5 gevangenisstraf en alternatieven.........................................................................................................................................32
Afdeling 3: …..................................................................................................................................................................................32
Afdeling 4: ‘civil litigation in Belgium -the reconstruction of the pyramid of legal disputes – a preliminary report’....................32
§1 vooraf....................................................................................................................................................................................32
§3 inleiding................................................................................................................................................................................32
§4 conceptuele beschouwingen................................................................................................................................................33
§5 de reconstructie vd globale pyramide..................................................................................................................................33
5.1. baseline: aantal ervaren relaties/situaties....................................................................................................................33
5.2. dispute assessment process..........................................................................................................................................33
5.3. dispute handling process...............................................................................................................................................33
5.4. vijftrapsmodel (afwijkend vh handboek).......................................................................................................................33
5.4.1.. grootste uitval (in deze case)................................................................................................................................33
5.4.2. verklaringen uitval en interpretatie.......................................................................................................................34
3
Charlotte Zegers
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller charlottezegers. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $8.24. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
