Summary

Samenvatting Philosophy of mind, brain and behaviour - Philosophy of Mind, Brain and Behaviour (SOW-PSB2AS20E) -- Readings & Lectures

0 purchase

Course
Philosophy of Mind, Brain and Behaviour (SOWPSB2AS20E)

Institution
Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen (RU)

Book
Philosophy of mind, brain and behaviour

Summary Philosophy of mind, brain and behaviour - Philosophy of Mind, Brain and Behaviour (SOW-PSB2AS20E). Summary of the weekly reading material and lectures + notes from the working groups.

[Show more]

Preview 4 out of 50 pages

View example

Summarized whole book? Yes
Uploaded on June 13, 2024
Number of pages 50
Written in 2023/2024
Type Summary

substance dualisme
4e cognition
functionalisme
identity theory
behaviorsm

Book Title:Philosophy of mind, brain and behaviour

Author(s):Marc Slors, Leon de Bruin

Edition:oktober 2015
ISBN:9789089536549
Edition:1

Institution
Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen (RU)
Education
Psychologie
Course
Philosophy of Mind, Brain and Behaviour (SOWPSB2AS20E)

delaneybeens

Member since 3 year 7 documents sold

$6.91

Add to cart

Add to wishlist

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Philosophy of Mind, Brain, and
Behavior
WEEKLY READINGS

Week 1 — WR: Introduction and Dualism 2
Lecture 1 — Introduction & Dualism 5
Week 2 — WR: Behaviorism and Identity Theory 7
Lecture 2 — Behaviorism and Identity Theory 15
Week 3 — WR Functionalism, Consciousness & Eliminativism 18
Lecture 3 — Functionalism, Consciousness & Eliminativism 21
Week 4 — WR Interpretivism & 4E Cognition 26
Lecture 4 — Interpretivism & 4E Cognition 29
Week 5 — WR Philosophy of science: Ideal Science 32
Lecture 5 — Philosophy of science for psychologists 36
Lecture 6 — Philosophy of science: how does science actually develop? 40
Week 7 — WR Free Will 43
Lecture 7 — Free will 46

, Week 1 — WR: Introduction and Dualism
Chapter 1: The mind-body problem
Mental states have a number of properties that make them di cult to understand:

“being about something”
You can think about an in nite number of things, that seem to be completely random. None of
these topics are themselves part of your thoughts. Your thoughts only refer to them.

“experiences”
Such as tasting, seeing, and feeling. You need to have experiences this to be able to know what
it’s like. These experiences are fundamentally subjective.

It’s di cult to explain these phenomena as if they are here in the physical world. Because of this it
may seem that the mind is something non-physical.

All contemporary theories of the mind can be understood as responses to the idea that the mind
resides in an immaterial soul that is distinguishable from the body, this is called dualism.

Section 1.1: Substance dualism
Substance dualism is the theory according to which people consist of two parts:
(1) A material body
(2) An immaterial soul

Descartes believed that the body and soul were two distinct substances that can exist
independently. According to him, the soul does not occupy space. Only material things occupy
space — he thought that this is exactly what de nes matter. The essence of the immaterial
soul is what he called ‘thinking’ (which Descartes referred to when speaking about all conscious
processes such as imaging, perceiving, desiring, believing, doubting, hoping, dreaming, etc…)

Section 1.1.1: Doubt as argument
Descartes’ substance dualism is the product of his quest for the foundations of scienti c
knowledge — he believed that these foundations should consist of knowledge that we cannot
doubt. He searched for any knowledge that could not be doubted and found that the only
thing was: him doubting. Hence: cogito ergo sum

“I think therefore I am”

ffi fi fi ffi fi

, According to Descartes, material objects cannot reason and cannot be conscious. Others,
however, see a direct proof of dualism in his cogito argument:

Leibniz (1646-1716) ‘identity of indiscernible’:
We can only say that x is the same as y, if x and y share all their properties. Even though they are
identical in all their properties — such as shape, color, weight, smoothness — they still di er in
their place in space and time. Only if they would share that property too, they would be one.

Leibniz’ principle can be used to argue that Descartes’ thinking ‘me’ — the soul — cannot be the
same entity as a material body or brain. Descartes argued that we can doubt the existence of our
own bodies and brains, but we cannot doubt our own existence as thinking things. Hence,
these thinking things appear to have a property that our bodies and brains lack.

1.1.2: Two features of Cartesian dualism
The rst feature is “immateriality of the soul”

Descartes’ thinking ‘me’ is his conception of the soul. This entity
interacts with the material body.

The second feature is “separation of the outside world and the inside mind”

Descartes’ thinking ‘me’ is separated from the outside world. It is
connected, but only indirectly through the senses and through behavior.
Knowledge of the world resides in the mind, but consist only of what he
calls ‘ideas’. Ideas exist in the mind but they are often about the world.
Thought is the manipulation of ideas. True knowledge consists of ideas
that correspond with how the world really is.

1.1.3: Problems with arguments for dualism
Descartes’ arguments were based on the idea that material objects or entities cannot think, and
thus were unable to produce or use language, to reason, or have conscious experiences.
In the present day it is easier to comprehend why Descartes was wrong for thinking this,
because we are in a time where it seems more possible that computers can reason and produce/
understand language (not meaning they can do this exactly like humans do). But there are no
reasons to deny that one day they might be able to do so.

The argument from ‘doubt’ remains. We cannot doubt the fact that there is someone who doubts.
So the argument goes that this someone cannot be identical with her brain and body: for in oder
for there to be identity, the shining entity must share all properties with her brain and body.

fi ff

, The relevant distinction here is between ontology and epistemology.

Ontology is the study of ”what really exists”. The idea that the mind
and the body are distinct entities is an ontological conclusion

The distinction between the mind and the body in terms of what we
can doubt is an epistemological distinction. It is not about the mind
and the body as they exist, but between the mind and the body as
we know them.

1.1.4: The interaction problem
The absence of logically inescapable arguments for dualism doesn't negate its validity, but there
are arguments against it, notably the interaction problem. Princess Elisabeth of Bohemia, a
contemporary of Descartes, raised this issue: how can an immaterial soul a ect a material body,
and vice versa? Descartes proposed the pineal gland as the interface for this interaction, but
modern physics challenges this view with the causal closure of the physical realm. This principle
suggests that all physical events have complete physical explanations, leaving no room for
immaterial entities like the soul to in uence physical processes.

fl ff

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller delaneybeens. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $6.91. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

68175 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 15 years now

Start selling

Summary

Samenvatting Philosophy of mind, brain and behaviour - Philosophy of Mind, Brain and Behaviour (SOW-PSB2AS20E) -- Readings & Lectures

Document information

Subjects

Connected book

Written for

Seller

Reviews received

Content preview