100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Samenvatting - Behavioral Economics (D0R80a) KUL $9.71   Add to cart

Summary

Samenvatting - Behavioral Economics (D0R80a) KUL

 4 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Summary of the entire course based on the notes, slides, and papers for the Behavioral Economics (D0R80a) class, taught by Professor Ebo Botchway in the 2nd year of the Master's program in Business Engineering. At the end of the document, you will find all concepts and a sample exam.

Preview 4 out of 40  pages

  • June 24, 2024
  • 40
  • 2023/2024
  • Summary
avatar-seller
BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS
Professor Ebo Botchway




KU LEUVEN
Rik Teugels

,1 TABLE OF CONTENTS
2 What is Behavioral Economics ....................................................................................................... 2
3 Experimental Design .................................................................................................................... 11
4 Bounded Rationality and Prospect Theory................................................................................... 16
5 Bounded Self-Interest .................................................................................................................. 20
6 Self-Control and Intertemporal Choices....................................................................................... 24
7 Heuristics, Biases, and Preference Construction ......................................................................... 26
8 Papers class 8 ............................................................................................................................... 29
9 Consumer Behavior and Energy Consumption ............................................................................ 33
10 Concepts ....................................................................................................................................... 35
11 Sample Exam ................................................................................................................................ 39




1

,2 WHAT IS BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS

2.1 PAPER 1 – A PSYCHOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE ON ECONOMICS (KAHNEMAN, 2003)
Classical theory (Frey, 1970): “The agent of economic theory is rational and selfish, and his tastes do
not change

Kahneman thought this was not true, that agents are not completely rational, selfish and that their
tastes can change

Behavioral approach to economics: 3 pillars of Behavioral Economics (BE)

- Bounded Self-Interest: people are not completely selfish
o Classical theory: people are selfish
o Ultimatum games: decision-makers act differently when people are involved than
when a computer is involved, this means that they are not completely rational
o Bounded self-interest
- Bounded Rationality: people are not completely rational
o Classical theory: people are rational, utility maximizers (choose decision that gives
best option)
o Subjective expected utility maximization?
▪ Subjective expected utility: attractiveness of an economic opportunity as
perceived by a decision-maker in the presence of risk
o Observed preferences violate the standard theory (so people are not completely
rational):
▪ Allais paradox (2 alternatieven met kans op geld)
▪ Ellsberg paradox (vat met 90 ballen)
▪ Framing effects in preference elicitation (Kahneman & Tversky)
o Bounded rationality (Simon) and satisficing as realistic normative standard for
organisms with finite minds:
▪ People are rational but within limits, we cannot calculate everything as a
computer, we can not use all the info
- Bounded Will-power (= time-inconsistent preferences): people are not completely consistent
o Classical theory: unchanging tastes
▪ Current position on indifference curves are irrelevant (het maakt niet uit wat
we al hebben, we gaan altijd hetzelfde verkiezen)
▪ So people are reference independent? Their reference point does not matter?
o Relevance of short-term emotions associated with gains and losses:
▪ Prospect Theory (Kahneman & Tversky): descriptive model of risky choice
▪ Idea of loss aversion extended to riskless choice to explain endowment effect
o Taste does change:
▪ Adaptation and shift in reference point: hedonic and affective forecasts
▪ We have a reference point = relative (so not absolute)
o Bounded will-power (= time-inconsistent preferences)

Ultimatum game:

- 2 players where player 1 gets money and has to divide between the 2 players
o Has the freedom of the division decisions
- Player 2 can accept or reject the offer. When he reject, both players get nothing

2

, - Decision of player 1:
o Split fairly:
▪ Decision of player 2:
• Accept: 5, 5
• Reject: 0, 0
o Split unfairly:
▪ Decision of player 2:
• Accept: 8, 2
• Reject: 0, 0
- Observation: most of the time, player 1 will divide fairly (bounded self-interest) even though
out of selfishness, the best split is unfairly because player 1 and player 2 want to maximize
- Player 1 can decide first, and player 2 can decide (independent of the decision of player 1)
between money or no money

Allais paradox:

- Experiment 1:
o A: 1M, prob = 1
o B: 5M, 0.1; 1M, 0.89; 0, 0.01
o DM is risk averse and chooses A
- Experiment 2:
o A’: 1M, 0.11; 0, 0.89
o B’: 5M, 0.1; 0, 0.9
o B’ is preferred
Probability
Option: 0.1 0.01 0.89
A 1M 1M 1M
B 5M 0 1M
A’ 1M 1M 0
B’ 5M 0 0
- 3e kolom geeft redundant informatie tussen de 2 alternatieven (voor beide situaties). Bij het
weghalen van deze kolom, valt het ook op dat A = A’ en B = B’. Toch worden A en B’ verkozen
door DM. Dus ze veranderen van alternatief
- Thus: people are not rational because they change

Ellsberg paradox:

- Context: 90 ballen waarvan 30 rode en 60 zwart/gele
- Experiment 1: de meeste mensen kiezen A want ze weten dat er 30 rode ballen er zijn
o A: je krijgt 100 euro als je een rode bal trekt
o B: je krijgt 100 euro als je een zwarte bal trekt
- Experiment 2: kiezen B’ want ze weten dat er 60 zwarte of gele ballen zijn
o A’: je krijgt 100 euro als je een rode of gele bal trekt
o B’: je krijgt 100 euro als je een zwarte of gele bal trekt
- Redundante informatie: zowel in A’ als B’ krijg je 100 euro als je een gele of zwarte bal trekt.
We kunnen deze ‘of’ weglaten en bekomen opnieuw A = A’ en B = B’. Toch verkiezen mensen
A en B’
- Thus: people are not rational because they change from A = A’ to B’ = B



3

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller rikteugels. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $9.71. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

73243 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$9.71
  • (0)
  Add to cart