This is an example of an essay written by a first class law graduate. The essay question is on Intellectual Property Law and is as follows: Critically analyse the current state of design law protections in the United Kingdom, in doing so: (1) show whether in your view the current law is "fit for pu...
Essay Question
Critically analyse the current state of design law protections in the United Kingdom, in doing
so:
(1) show whether in your view the current law is "fit for purpose" in our digital age; and
(2) identify any weaknesses in the current design law protections and if so how you consider
the relevant protections may be strengthened.
Word Count: 2,199
1
, Table of Cases
Apple Computer Inc v Design Registry (2001) All E R (D) 336
British Leyland Motor Corp v Armstrong Patents Co Ltd [1986] RPC 279
Canon Kabushiki Kaisha v Green Cartridge Co (Hong Kong) Ltd [1997] FSR 817
Celanese International Corp v BP Chemicals Ltd [1999] RPC 203
Farmers Build Ltd v Caner Bulk Materials Handling Ltd and Others [1999] RPC 461
Ford Motor Company and Iveco Fiat’s Design Application [1993] RPC 417
Gerber Garment Technology Inc v Lectra Systems Ltd [1997] RPC 443 CA
Green Lane Products Ltd v PMS International Group Ltd and Others [2008] FSR 28
J Choo (Jersey) Ltd v Towerstone Ltd [2008] FSR 19
Karen Millen v Dunnes Stores [2007] IEHC 449
Lambretta Clothing Co v Teddy Smith plc & Next Retail Ltd [2002] FSR 10
LB (Plastics) v Swish Products [1979] FSR 145
Ocular Sciences and Another v Aspect Vision Care Ltd [1997] RPC 289
PepsiCo Inc v Grupo Promer Mon-Graphic SA (C-281/10 P)
Procter & Gamble Co v Reckitt Benckiser (UK) Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 936
Rolawn Ltd and Rolawn (Turf Growers) Ltd v Turfmech Ltd [2008] EWHC 989
Samsung Electronics (UK) Ltd v Apple Inc [2013] ECDR 1; [2013] ECDR 2; [2013] FSR 10
Scholes Windows Ltd v Magnet Ltd [2002] FSR 10
Società Esplosivi Industriali SpA v Ordnance Technologies (UK) Ltd (formerly SEI (UK) Ltd and ors) [2004]
EWHC 48 (Ch); [2007] EWHC 2875 (Ch), [2008] RPC 12
Ultraframe v Fielding [2003] RPC 435
Woodhouse UK plc v Architectural Lighting Systems [2005] ECPCC (Designs) 25
2
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller FirstClassLawEssentials. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $12.93. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
