This is an example of an essay written by a first class law graduate. The essay question is on the Law of Evidence and is a 'no case to answer'. All sources are cited and bibliography is included.
, Written Assessment Question
You are a busy Solicitor-Advocate working for the Criminal Law firm, Stewarts and Co., in
Edinburgh. You are representing Malcolm Brown (a long-standing client) in an ongoing trial
in the High Court. He is accused of having committed the following offences:
• Charge 1: sexual assault (grabbing a breast) of a 22 year old woman in the early hours of
the morning on a secluded park bench in August 2000;
• Charge 2: rape of a 28 year woman at around midnight in a quiet bar during January 2014;
• Charge 3: attempted rape of a 42 year old woman at noon at an isolated bus stop in
February 2017;
• Charge 4: sexual assault (pinching a buttock) of a 20 year old woman on the quiet top deck
of a double-decker bus at 4pm on March 2020.
The evidence against Mr Brown includes:
• Evidence from each of the complainers about the alleged offences committed against
them.
• In respect of Charges 2 and 4 respectively, two witnesses’ evidence detailing the
complainers’ distressed appearances, together with the complainers’ own descriptions of
the alleged offences, shortly after the alleged offences took place. However, both
complainers were extremely upset at the time and had given the witnesses only vague
descriptions of what they said had occurred.
• A record of Malcolm Brown’s own police interview statement, given while he was being
held at Edinburgh Police Station, on 4 September 2020. Mr Brown said he did not want a
solicitor to be present:
“I’m in far too much of a hurry to get out of this police station to wait for any lawyer getting
here! So, go ahead, take down everything I say and see if you can prove I did it this time
guys!”
You have decided to prepare a written submission of “no case to answer” on Mr Brown’s
behalf challenging the applicability of the Moorov doctrine and the use of distress as
corroboration in respect of the alleged offences. Also, give your view as to the fairness /
admissibility of the interview on 4 September 2020.
2
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller FirstClassLawEssentials. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $13.06. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
