“Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions and Emerging Confluences Revisited” by
LINCOLN, LYNHAM and GUBA
The authors outline that an ‘important issue’ can mean several things dependant on who
is defining the issue where characteristics can include:
Widely debated – validity becomes an issue
New awareness (like role of values)
Influence of one paradigm over another
New or extend theoretical or field oriented treatment are available – voice and reflexivity
becomes an issue
The new contradicts earlier formulation debating method, paradigm or ethics
Foregrounds larger social movements undermining qualitative research in the name of
science
It is pointed out that paradigms are shifting and are considered more fluid. This is critical
to allow qualitative research to make a significant impact on policy formation and the amends of
social ills. The authors themselves take on a constructionist viewpoint where the real is defined
in terms of community consensus and what has meaning within that community. For them, social
phenomena includes meaning-making activities which can be changed if found faulty,
incomplete, and malformed.
At first, the idea of values was given the label of being an issues; however, the authors go
on to later identify it as an axiology. Axiology is defined as “the branch of philosophy dealing
with ethics, aesthetics, and religion” (p. 116). This concept is being increasingly defined out of
the scientific inquiry since it concerns religion.
Naturalistic inquiry and where values fit into the inquiry process:
Choice of the problem
Choice of paradigm to guide the problem
Choice of theoretical framework
Choice of data gathering and analysing methods
Choice of context and treatment of values within context
Choice of format for presenting the findings
Within the naturalistic paradigm, qualitative methods are stressed simply because these types of
methods are easier to the human-as-instrument idea.
Commensurability (definition: measured by the same standard) between paradigms
(positivist and constructivist) is not possible; however, within each paradigm a solution may be
mixed methods. The answer given by the authors to the question “are paradigms
commensurable” is a cautious yes when the models share axiomatic elements.
Positivism and postpositivism = commensurable
Positivism and interpretivist = not commensurable
Cumulation (definition: the gathering or accumulation of) is often thought of as impossible
within qualitative research meaning that it cannot be aggregated to make larger understandings
or policy formulations possible; however, the authors would disagree. They think that since the
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller grghsm. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $5.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.